It's been established by those who gave competed in college that doping is common in college. That isn't a percentage; it simply means it is common as distinct from being uncommon or even rare.
So no real consensus then. Just gossip and tall tales.
Based on personal gut feeling and local experiences, it might be considered "rare" to one, "uncommon" to another, "common" to a third, and "very common" for the ridiculous.
Plain English, and especially when it relates to experience rather than academic studies, isn't percentages or statistics. But you won't know that. You are uncommonly obtuse. Note the use of uncommon.
So no real consensus then. Just gossip and tall tales.
Based on personal gut feeling and local experiences, it might be considered "rare" to one, "uncommon" to another, "common" to a third, and "very common" for the ridiculous.
Plain English, and especially when it relates to experience rather than academic studies, isn't percentages or statistics. But you won't know that. You are uncommonly obtuse. Note the use of uncommon.
It may be plain, but it is also vague and relative and subjective, and wildly so among those who have no personal experience -- convenient for confirming ones preconceived notions.
I note that you have once again veered off topic to lob a personal insult because you can add no clarity, and you cannot dispute what is self-evident. You only managed to stay on topic for one iteration.
I am not the one who doesn't know Valby's results; you are. As expected.
You're the one claiming she has run more than one race since last year. But you fail to back it up.
I don't have to back anything up for it to be a fact that Valby has run more than one race since last year. Did your brain freeze in the cold of the Southern Ocean? 🐧 You are the only one failing here.
Plain English, and especially when it relates to experience rather than academic studies, isn't percentages or statistics. But you won't know that. You are uncommonly obtuse. Note the use of uncommon.
It may be plain, but it is also vague and relative and subjective, and wildly so among those who have no personal experience -- convenient for confirming ones preconceived notions.
I note that you have once again veered off topic to lob a personal insult because you can add no clarity, and you cannot dispute what is self-evident. You only managed to stay on topic for one iteration.
It isn't vague. It is understandable to anyone who has a grasp of basic English. But it isn't percentages, which only a bean-counter requires, because no one presumes a numerical measure to one point in a hundred since it hasn't been measured to that degree, and can't be. Your wilfully naive position is that there can be a statistically survey of that which no one admits to doing - but they will be doing all the same.
You're the one claiming she has run more than one race since last year. But you fail to back it up.
I don't have to back anything up for it to be a fact that Valby has run more than one race since last year. Did your brain freeze in the cold of the Southern Ocean? 🐧 You are the only one failing here.
Yes, you do have to back it up because you made the claim. So she has run more than one race since last year? Two? Is that a retired athlete or an injured athlete?
Since you also know the details of her career you will also know she has acquired the services of a coach with doping connections.
This post was edited 6 minutes after it was posted.
So no real consensus then. Just gossip and tall tales.
Based on personal gut feeling and local experiences, it might be considered "rare" to one, "uncommon" to another, "common" to a third, and "very common" for the ridiculous.
Do you have any facts that led you to insult all people who think "very common" as "ridiculous"?
So no real consensus then. Just gossip and tall tales.
Based on personal gut feeling and local experiences, it might be considered "rare" to one, "uncommon" to another, "common" to a third, and "very common" for the ridiculous.
Do you have any facts that led you to insult all people who think "very common" as "ridiculous"?
I did say "based on personal gut feeling and local experiences".
And what facts are needed to suggest "it might be considered"? It might and it mightn't.
The non-ridiculous who may consider it "very common", should not be insulted, and the ridiculous should not either, as sadly for them, it would be true.
But in all cases, as you can see from the subject line, the alleged insult did not originate with me, but from other "people" who called the OP "ridiculous for saying doping is very common in colllege".
Based on personal gut feeling and local experiences, it might be considered "rare" for the ridiculous, "uncommon" to one, "common" to another, and "very common" to the third.
Based on personal gut feeling and local experiences, it might be considered "rare" for the ridiculous, "uncommon" to one, "common" to another, and "very common" to the third.
So in other words, there is no real consensus. Just gossip and tall tales.
look up registration statistics on steroid forums, subreddits, and ask some guys who workout and juice at gyms; ask dealers.
you can find out a lot just by talking to the right people.
Look; back a few years ago when guys like me were saying that guys like Nick Bare were juicing, some of you guys resisted.
Now, it's apparent and without a shadow of a doubt that we were right. Everybody is juicing.
Obviously there are exceptions, but the fact is, some of the most competitive-spirited folk who are some of the most successful folk are also some of the best at keeping a secret and trying their damnedest to hide it.
And for some of them? Getting a prescription for inhaled albuterol, pinning gh from a doctor, pinning insulin after a hard workout, and taking TRT prescribed by a doctor and keeping them under 1200ng/dl will allow them to pass tests and perform at their highest without issues.
And on top of that, they're using PEMF, red light devices, acoustic wave therapy (Gainswave basically), and something like DSIP to enhance sleep, perhaps other peptides, too. Maybe BPC and TB-500. Doctors can prescribe those, too, and I doubt the athletes get tested for them regularly