Every time you try and used past stats to defend Djoker, Harambe wins, you get that right?
It's 11 pages of proving his point.
-
24
-
2600 bro wrote:
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
You contradict yourself actually as you (2600bro) are saying LeFlop is the goat, numerically speaking, which isn’t even true… it’s subjectively true in certain categories like points scored but not so in other categories like MVP awards or championships. But then you can’t or won’t accept, numerically speaking, that Djokovic is the goat because he leads almost every single category.
BUT, to YOUR point, what makes him the goat more than anything else is the fact, according to you, that he won an Olympic gold medal WHILE suffering from long COVID. I mean, nobody is ever going to top that circus act.
You, who fancy yourself the King, are not good at arguing. But arguing you do because you simply cannot restrain your ego. It is something to see…🤡🤡🤡
Yes the famously subjective category of "points scored"
Breathless, panting, sweating
Hey dumba$$, nobody is saying the CATEGORY is subjective itself. Only the overall assessment is subjective, because he’s not the leader in all categories. Can you read?
Again though, your alter ego has already said numerical analyses don’t count anyway, lol. 🤡
20 -
But I do have ask you, do you honestly, seriously believe LeFlop is the goat? Really? Man, stick to your day job, exercise sciencing or whatever.
31 -
Da Joker wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Chokervic played during the twilight of Nadal and Fed. His competition was far weaker for many of his slams. His path was objectively easier. BUT, he still is a clear contender, probably the leader, for GOAT.
It’s almost as if you are saying that Djoker only beat Fed and Nadal because they were past their prime due to their age.
Lol. This is just too easy. Oh buddy, you didn’t just fall into a trap, you somersaulted into it while narrating your own downfall. Yours wasn’t a response; it was a cautionary tale for anyone considering typing before thinking.
But hey, good on you and your buddy for at least showing up. Next time, bring a thought that’s been fully baked, or at least microwaved. I’ll keep the trap warm.
#StilltheKing 👑
Their declines were stately, elegant, normal.
Chokers… has not been.
And man, it’s pretty embarrassing to use ChatGPT to argue on a message board, or even worse to write like an AI…
Oh buddy, you didn’t just fall into a trap, you somersaulted into it while narrating your own downfall. Yours wasn’t a response; it was a cautionary tale for anyone considering typing before thinking.^ textbook slop
05 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
it’s subjectively true in certain categories like points scored
Next time my team loses I’ll remind myself the scoreboard is subjective
15 -
2600 bro wrote:
Every time you try and used past stats to defend Djoker, Harambe wins, you get that right?
It's 11 pages of proving his point.
It’s copy paste from tennis-reference or obvious AI slop. They’re just lazy now.
They could quit at any time but they can’t stop themselves. Quixotic. The King is always ready.
15 -
He is clean
00 -
Harambe wrote:
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
it’s subjectively true in certain categories like points scored
Next time my team loses I’ll remind myself the scoreboard is subjective
Yep, you can’t read either and only respond selectively. Great job👍 LeFlop is the overall NBA scoring leader (and selfish player) so he’s the goat? Got it. And the scoreboard is objective but Djokovic’s all time slams record is not. Nor is his gold medal, that he valiantly fought through long Covid to win😂
You wipe your splooge off of your mirror today yet? Gotta get the reflection squeaky clean and perfect for tomorrow’s session.
21 -
Harambe wrote:
Da Joker wrote:
It’s almost as if you are saying that Djoker only beat Fed and Nadal because they were past their prime due to their age.
Lol. This is just too easy. Oh buddy, you didn’t just fall into a trap, you somersaulted into it while narrating your own downfall. Yours wasn’t a response; it was a cautionary tale for anyone considering typing before thinking.
But hey, good on you and your buddy for at least showing up. Next time, bring a thought that’s been fully baked, or at least microwaved. I’ll keep the trap warm.
#StilltheKing 👑
Their declines were stately, elegant, normal.
Yes, Nadal’s exit was so graceful and elegant, lmao. Normal? I agree. He’s been injured for like three straight years. It happens at age 35, especially in this ridiculously hard hitting era. That kind of deterioration is normal, but most guys hang it up when it starts. A from age 36 on is *normal*.
31 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Their declines were stately, elegant, normal.
Yes, Nadal’s exit was so graceful and elegant, lmao. Normal? I agree. He’s been injured for like three straight years. It happens at age 35, especially in this ridiculously hard hitting era. That kind of deterioration is normal, but most guys hang it up when it starts. A decline from age 36 on is *normal*.
10 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Next time my team loses I’ll remind myself the scoreboard is subjective
Yep, you can’t read either and only respond selectively. Great job👍 LeFlop is the overall NBA scoring leader (and selfish player) so he’s the goat? Got it. And the scoreboard is objective but Djokovic’s all time slams record is not. Nor is his gold medal, that he valiantly fought through long Covid to win😂
You wipe your splooge off of your mirror today yet? Gotta get the reflection squeaky clean and perfect for tomorrow’s session.
Selfish player? He’s taken multiple teams of bums to the finals in the most competitive era of the NBA.
You guys love stealing my jokes, it’s flattering. But it’s weird to defend danM who takes perverse delight when people die.
03 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Yes, Nadal’s exit was so graceful and elegant, lmao. Normal? I agree. He’s been injured for like three straight years. It happens at age 35, especially in this ridiculously hard hitting era. That kind of deterioration is normal, but most guys hang it up when it starts. A decline from age 36 on is *normal*.
More gracefully than Chokervics collapse, obviously. He had a shot to solidify his GOAT status. In the end, it was a different shot that was his downfall.
24 -
The upper classes don't vaxx their kids. Chumps only.
43 -
The vaccine origin story is less believable than Supermans.
52 -
2600 bro wrote:
Djoker could have put the GOAT debate to rest with once simple vaccination.
Instead we have 11 pages of crying from "tennis fans"
Pretty hilarious - will be talked about generations; generational stupidity :)
Have you even seen GOAT debates? No, he couldn't have. (Of course you haven't, you just started the LeBron one again.)
In any case, how many more Grand Slam titles (the only thing casuals care about) do you think he would have needed to "put it to rest"? One? Two? More?He won the 2023 US Open. Winning the 2024 Australian would have put him behind only Ken Rosewall for oldest to win an Open Era major, and anything after that would make him the absolute oldest. Rosewall's is hardly comparable anyway. That Australian Open had 49 players: 44 from Australia, 3 from New Zealand, and 2 from countries that don't exist anymore. Barely a major. No one else has won an Open Era major at 37+.
Being the oldest men's singles gold medalist by 8 years, despite having Long Covid (as all the best gorillas assure us), should count for something, too.
41 -
Meanwhile the mRNA poster child Rafael Nadal has aged very fast for some strange reason. Dude looks 20 years older than his actual age. 39? He looks 59!!!
In the game of life, it is GAME-SET-MATCH for GOAT Novak Djokovic!!!
51 -
Harambe wrote:
Da Joker wrote:
It’s almost as if you are saying that Djoker only beat Fed and Nadal because they were past their prime due to their age.
Lol. This is just too easy. Oh buddy, you didn’t just fall into a trap, you somersaulted into it while narrating your own downfall. Yours wasn’t a response; it was a cautionary tale for anyone considering typing before thinking.
But hey, good on you and your buddy for at least showing up. Next time, bring a thought that’s been fully baked, or at least microwaved. I’ll keep the trap warm.
#StilltheKing 👑
Their declines were stately, elegant, normal.
Chokers… has not been.
And man, it’s pretty embarrassing to use ChatGPT to argue on a message board, or even worse to write like an AI…
Oh buddy, you didn’t just fall into a trap, you somersaulted into it while narrating your own downfall. Yours wasn’t a response; it was a cautionary tale for anyone considering typing before thinking.^ textbook slop
The stately, elegant, normal decline of Rafael Nadal as laid out so eloquently by me earlier in this thread.
2022: Two Grand Slam wins and a Semi-final; Ranked #2 at the end of the year (behind the GOAT, of course)
2023-2024: Never got past the 2nd round in a major; in fact, only made it as far as one QF in any tournament; dropped to #670 ranking
Nov 2024: Retired
So stately, elegant and normal. Lol
SMH. Sorry. No AI was harmed in the crafting of my replies. Just good old-fashioned critical thinking, which apparently has you so rattled it triggered you into a software conspiracy theory. I can’t help it if using facts and clarity feels threatening to you. But from your response so far in this thread, I can see how it does.
BTW, I’ve been eagerly awaiting you to lay out your defense of some other tennis player as being the GOAT. Please get on with it, the suspense is killing me. All we’ve gotten so far is “trust me, bro.” lol
30 -
Harambe wrote:
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
More gracefully than Chokervics collapse, obviously.
I won’t put names to these two player’s end of careers (both ages 36-38) to keep it objective. You tell me who had the more “graceful collapse.” Lol
Player 1:
2022: 2 Grand Slam titles and a Semi-final; Ranked #2 at the end of the year (behind the GOAT, of course)
2023-2024: Never got past the 2nd round in a major; in fact, only made it as far as one QF in any tournament; dropped to #670 ranking
Player 2:
2023: 3 Grand Slam titles; #1 ranking
2024-2025 (so far): 1 Grand Slam Final, 3 semi-finals and 1 QF; 1 Olympic Gold Medal; fell to #6 ranking
Which had a more “graceful collapse,” obviously?
#theKing 🤴
40 -
Da Joker wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Their declines were stately, elegant, normal.
Chokers… has not been.
And man, it’s pretty embarrassing to use ChatGPT to argue on a message board, or even worse to write like an AI…
^ textbook slop
The stately, elegant, normal decline of Rafael Nadal as laid out so eloquently by me earlier in this thread.
2022: Two Grand Slam wins and a Semi-final; Ranked #2 at the end of the year (behind the GOAT, of course)
2023-2024: Never got past the 2nd round in a major; in fact, only made it as far as one QF in any tournament; dropped to #670 ranking
Nov 2024: Retired
So stately, elegant and normal. Lol
SMH. Sorry. No AI was harmed in the crafting of my replies. Just good old-fashioned critical thinking, which apparently has you so rattled it triggered you into a software conspiracy theory. I can’t help it if using facts and clarity feels threatening to you. But from your response so far in this thread, I can see how it does.
BTW, I’ve been eagerly awaiting you to lay out your defense of some other tennis player as being the GOAT. Please get on with it, the suspense is killing me. All we’ve gotten so far is “trust me, bro.” lol
Thank god you stopped using ChatGPT. that was painful.
Again your arguments are just number copy and pasting. You don’t watch tennis. Out of your depth.
If you watch Nadal you see his decline was smooth and predictable. Not like Chokervics. But you don’t watch tennis, preferring to stare at excel sheets of stats.
03 -
Da Joker wrote:
Harambe wrote:
More gracefully than Chokervics collapse, obviously.
I won’t put names to these two player’s end of careers (both ages 36-38) to keep it objective. You tell me who had the more “graceful collapse.” Lol
Player 1:
2022: 2 Grand Slam titles and a Semi-final; Ranked #2 at the end of the year (behind the GOAT, of course)
2023-2024: Never got past the 2nd round in a major; in fact, only made it as far as one QF in any tournament; dropped to #670 ranking
Player 2:
2023: 3 Grand Slam titles; #1 ranking
2024-2025 (so far): 1 Grand Slam Final, 3 semi-finals and 1 QF; 1 Olympic Gold Medal; fell to #6 ranking
Which had a more “graceful collapse,” obviously?
#theKing 🤴
2 had their game fall off a cliff.
The other, 1, was on a gradual glide slope of age.
It’s obvious to any fan of the game. Probably not ChatGPT, although the multimodal stuff is pretty good now.
This post was edited 18 seconds after it was posted.02
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.