Nice stock, generic response there. 0/10 for originality.
My reading comprehension is just fine. Just suggesting that Norway fits into the list as well.
No Norway does not, Norway fits in with the other 5 people that he did not include. Nothing about what was said required the inclusion of Norway. Reading comprehension matters.
"13 of the 18 qualifiers in the men's 1500 are from just 5 countries - USA, GB, Kenya, Netherlands, and Ethiopia."
Seems the list was of nations with 2 or more qualifiers so, yes, it was an error not to include Norway. US has 3, as does Kenya. That's six. Norway has 2, Ethiopia 2, GB 2, and Netherlands 2. Total of 14 for six nations. Drop Norway and you have five nations and 12 (not 13) qualifiers. The final four come from 4 different nations, Italy, Morocco, Germany, and Portugal.
So Everytime she hears a question she doesn't like she's going to just walk away? If she wins gold she'll be World Famous. She will be facing a world of questions. And there will be more opportunities to make a world of money. She needs to be taught to handle the media better.
Interviewer asked her a question along the line of 'so, how good does it feel to be stood here now after what happened for Tokyo? Are your family here watching?'
I would have walked off as well. That was 3 years ago. She admitted to her crap, took the punishment, learnt from errors and moved on. Some people need to move on as well.
I may not be one of her biggest fans, but come on now...
So Everytime she hears a question she doesn't like she's going to just walk away? If she wins gold she'll be World Famous. She will be facing a world of questions. And there will be more opportunities to make a world of money. She needs to be taught to handle the media better.
When it is the same darn #*#($& question about her behaviour which she owned up to, took the punishment for and came back better - yes she should walk away. You people thrive on pulling people down with your toxicity. She moved on after owning her mistakes. FFS do the same.
Kerry looked AMAZING. How're goes home devastated.
I go home devastated as the dinosaurs who designed this website don't let you edit posts.
What are you talking about. LRC has the absolute finest web design features from 1999 on this site. And its functionality on mobile is awesome. It only takes 10 seconds for it to load enough to let me scroll on phone!
Hocker: C- , didn't look in control, only secured his spot at the very end.
Nuguse: D-, awful placement, had to work way harder than he should. How about shadowing Kerr/Ingy next time?
Disagree about Hocker. I thought he looked fine. He ran on the rail to conserve energy and simply got boxed in for a while. He was patient and then swung wide last turn to unleash his kick. If you have that kick you can afford this tactic. I would say he was in control the whole time. B+ for Hocker.
As for Nuguse, well he qualifed, so he gets a C. He just didn't look great to me and seemed to struggle down the homestretch to kick it in. Let's hope this is just rust.
Goose gets a B from me because he gambled and won. He ran an easy race, trusted that there would be an opening, and when there was, he had zero trouble moving up like the rest of the field was standing still.
Those tactics would've been crazy in a semifinal, but in the less competitive heats, it was fine, especially because if he lost his bet, he still gets another shot.
