Unraveling is the way you say increasingly outlandish things and are becoming increasingly upset about getting proven wrong and being humiliated. It’s amusing to watch.
Not as amusing as knowing your farcical proposal will get nowhere. You're a clown who doesn't get the joke is on him.
Once again you fail to refrain from making a personal attack. It’s your coping mechanism for being outwitted and embarrassed.
You are wrong, again. The word “intent” can have many applications. People who write a rule have an intent for what the rule will accomplish.
The common use of the term is irrelevant to how it is used legally - which is the case of a ban. But you won't know that, it would require training you don't have.
You thought it was relevant until I proved you wrong about what the intent actually was. Then you pivoted to saying it’s not relevant. Hilarious!
There’s a lot of training you apparently don’t have. Civility, for instance.
Unending posts? You have posted at least 203 times in the last 4 days.
I am not the OP who repeatedly argues that a convicted doper should be allowed to return to competition before their ban is up. My posts are in response to his. However what is reassuring to those who prefer to clean up the sport is that his proposal will go nowhere.
If my proposal is going nowhere, then why do you keep responding to virtually every post on this thread and other Shelby threads? Talk about obsession!
In hundreds of threads with a hundred posts of you, nobody agrees with you.
So aside from the doping apologist OP, who else has posted on this thread that Houlihan should be allowed to return to competition a year before her ban is up so she can compete in Paris?
As usual, you haven't understood anything.
You used it as an argument for yourself, that the OP didn't get a lot of agreement from other posters (is this true at all?). When confronted with the fact that you almost never get some agreement - you change the subject. Same behaviour as so many times before.
The common use of the term is irrelevant to how it is used legally - which is the case of a ban. But you won't know that, it would require training you don't have.
You thought it was relevant until I proved you wrong about what the intent actually was. Then you pivoted to saying it’s not relevant. Hilarious!
There’s a lot of training you apparently don’t have. Civility, for instance.
I am not the OP who repeatedly argues that a convicted doper should be allowed to return to competition before their ban is up. My posts are in response to his. However what is reassuring to those who prefer to clean up the sport is that his proposal will go nowhere.
If my proposal is going nowhere, then why do you keep responding to virtually every post on this thread and other Shelby threads? Talk about obsession!
Yes, talk about obsession. Yours is off the charts.
So aside from the doping apologist OP, who else has posted on this thread that Houlihan should be allowed to return to competition a year before her ban is up so she can compete in Paris?
As usual, you haven't understood anything.
You used it as an argument for yourself, that the OP didn't get a lot of agreement from other posters (is this true at all?). When confronted with the fact that you almost never get some agreement - you change the subject. Same behaviour as so many times before.
What a manchild you are.
You do nothing on these threads but buzz around my posts, like a blowfly.
This post was edited 19 seconds after it was posted.
If my proposal is going nowhere, then why do you keep responding to virtually every post on this thread and other Shelby threads? Talk about obsession!
Yes, talk about obsession. Yours is off the charts.
You have written more than 50 posts in the last 24 hours. You are obsessed.
Yes, talk about obsession. Yours is off the charts.
You have written more than 50 posts in the last 24 hours. You are obsessed.
But one who follows what I post isn't? However, I am not obsessed with arguing again and again that the rules be changed to suit a doping cheat, which is the purpose of this thread. The rules won't change but the obsessive doping apologists won't shut their stupid traps.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
If my proposal is going nowhere, then why do you keep responding to virtually every post on this thread and other Shelby threads? Talk about obsession!
Yes, talk about obsession. Yours is off the charts.
LMAO! Your post is the equivalent of “I know you are but what am I?” You’ve now completely unraveled.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.