You provided an academic reference that said that the terms you use are racist and should not be used. You admitted it. And then call people who point to your admission as being mentally ill.
I can probably provide an academic reference that establishes your IQ is two standard deviations below the norm.
An insult.
But what you did provide, and I repeat, was an academic reference that the words you fully admitted and you kept repeatedly using, are racistand should not be used.
The whiners here object to Gault's question. I have sought to explain why I think it is a fair question. But I realise the indignantly stupid - like yourself - will not see that.
The whiner is the guy having a melt down because most posters want to know why Gault/LR treat Jackson so differently from Wightman, Ingebrigsten and especially Houlihan on a thread about JGault.
It is a legitimate question and one that Gault has so far refused to answer. I think we all know why.
The post was about whether Gault's question to Jackson was valid. It was. It isn't a critique of every aspect of his journalism. If the question to Jackson was valid - it is - it stands on its own merits, regardless of what else he has said of anyone else. I see this distinction is beyond you and most posters here. I am surprised you don't also insist on an underwear check for Gault.
I can probably provide an academic reference that establishes your IQ is two standard deviations below the norm.
An insult.
But what you did provide, and I repeat, was an academic reference that the words you fully admitted and you kept repeatedly using, are racistand should not be used.
It didn't say that but I understand you will never get that. I guess I will just keep calling a spade a spade, meaning not that you are black, as you stupidly infer, but that you are the most deranged poster ever come to this site.
I didn't see anything wrong with the question. Good interviewers ask open-ended questions. There are many different angles she could've taken in an answer.
But what you did provide, and I repeat, was an academic reference that the words you fully admitted and you kept repeatedly using, are racistand should not be used.
It didn't say that but I understand you will never get that. I guess I will just keep calling a spade a spade, meaning not that you are black, as you stupidly infer, but that you are the most deranged poster ever come to this site.
I only repeat that you use phrases that you yourself provided external reference that your phrases should no longer be used as they are racist.
Against your own admittance you continued ,with venom, that showed you did not care one jot who you might offend.
And then once more you add insults based upon statements about the mental illnesses of posters.
Mods…. are you allowed to insult based on mental conditions or use mental conditions as the basis for insults?
It didn't say that but I understand you will never get that. I guess I will just keep calling a spade a spade, meaning not that you are black, as you stupidly infer, but that you are the most deranged poster ever come to this site.
I only repeat that you use phrases that you yourself provided external reference that your phrases should no longer be used as they are racist.
Against your own admittance you continued ,with venom, that showed you did not care one jot who you might offend.
And then once more you add insults based upon statements about the mental illnesses of posters.
Mods…. are you allowed to insult based on mental conditions or use mental conditions as the basis for insults?
The phrase "spade" should not be used if it is intended as a racial slur. It wasn't. It does however remain the noun of a garden implement. That is how it was used. Apparently gardening is something you have never done. But there is much in this life you obviously know nothing about.
Armstronglivs: Well done Gault, Jackson is a dirty doper.
Seb Coe: would like to see a clean athlete like Jackson erase a dirty record.
Armstronglivs: Lord Coe proves my point.
Everyone else: 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Armstronglivs: But but but Lord Coe.
This has truly been one of the funniest conversations to follow, thank you Armstronglivs for the laughs.
LOL, that does explain this entire conversation well.
It’s been hilarious to watch.
How strange he suddenly doesn’t want to focus on Gault’s insinuation that Jackson might be doped since he shot himself in the foot by dragging Seb’s sound byte into the conversation 😂
I only repeat that you use phrases that you yourself provided external reference that your phrases should no longer be used as they are racist.
Against your own admittance you continued ,with venom, that showed you did not care one jot who you might offend.
And then once more you add insults based upon statements about the mental illnesses of posters.
Mods…. are you allowed to insult based on mental conditions or use mental conditions as the basis for insults?
The phrase "spade" should not be used if it is intended as a racial slur. It wasn't. It does however remain the noun of a garden implement. That is how it was used. Apparently gardening is something you have never done. But there is much in this life you obviously know nothing about.
You are digging a hole for yourself.
Your own reference said the the phrase not the word should no longer be used and when you had the reference re presented to you increased it’s intolerable use thus mocking those that are offended.
There was a word for a form of brown but this is no longer acceptable in any circumstances.
You attempted to cover the racial use by pointing to a garden tool when it was clear that you were using it in the context that you yourself stated was no longer acceptable.
You continued to mock and bait by its use in contexts alien from gardening.
Want to dig a bigger hole about all medical books being wrong ?
LOL, that does explain this entire conversation well.
It’s been hilarious to watch.
How strange he suddenly doesn’t want to focus on Gault’s insinuation that Jackson might be doped since he shot himself in the foot by dragging Seb’s sound byte into the conversation 😂
Oops 🤡
Where is Gault's "insinuation"? It was a question. But it says volumes about what you suspect if you think it points to Jackson being a doper. Oops.
The phrase "spade" should not be used if it is intended as a racial slur. It wasn't. It does however remain the noun of a garden implement. That is how it was used. Apparently gardening is something you have never done. But there is much in this life you obviously know nothing about.
You are digging a hole for yourself.
Your own reference said the the phrase not the word should no longer be used and when you had the reference re presented to you increased it’s intolerable use thus mocking those that are offended.
There was a word for a form of brown but this is no longer acceptable in any circumstances.
You attempted to cover the racial use by pointing to a garden tool when it was clear that you were using it in the context that you yourself stated was no longer acceptable.
You continued to mock and bait by its use in contexts alien from gardening.
Want to dig a bigger hole about all medical books being wrong ?
If I am "digging a hole" for myself, does that mean I am using a spade? Or a black person?
You are a complete half-wit. That's my calling a spade a spade.
How strange he suddenly doesn’t want to focus on Gault’s insinuation that Jackson might be doped since he shot himself in the foot by dragging Seb’s sound byte into the conversation 😂
Oops 🤡
Where is Gault's "insinuation"? It was a question. But it says volumes about what you suspect if you think it points to Jackson being a doper. Oops.
It was following something YOU implied endlessly until YOU humiliated yourself by adding Coe’s take 😂😂😂😂😂
The other question he might have asked is how did she manage to drop 0.6s off her PB in a year. That is an astronomical improvement in a sprinter over this distance. It would be like Lyles going from 19.5 to sub-19 in a year.
She dropped .24 last year and .36 this year. This stuff is easy to follow, so why do you guys insist on making stuff up.
I can’t believe armstronglivs can humiliate himself so many times in one discussion👋🏼
Your own reference said the the phrase not the word should no longer be used and when you had the reference re presented to you increased it’s intolerable use thus mocking those that are offended.
There was a word for a form of brown but this is no longer acceptable in any circumstances.
You attempted to cover the racial use by pointing to a garden tool when it was clear that you were using it in the context that you yourself stated was no longer acceptable.
You continued to mock and bait by its use in contexts alien from gardening.
Want to dig a bigger hole about all medical books being wrong ?
If I am "digging a hole" for myself, does that mean I am using a spade? Or a black person?
You are a complete half-wit. That's my calling a spade a spade.
You provide an academic reference saying that the phrase should no longer be used.
Now you are spinning away from it
Just like you take your own interpretation of the Shelby decision that said that intent was only deemed for the purpose of rule ten.
You can’t have it both ways dear chap.
So your intended meaning of the phrase in question and thus CAS meaning in the decision.
I didn't see anything wrong with the question. Good interviewers ask open-ended questions. There are many different angles she could've taken in an answer.
Every open-ended question is not a good question. A good question yields an interesting insight from the interviewee. Whether or not Gault's question was valid is irrelevant. It was a bad question because Jackson clearly saw it as an attempt to bait her into saying something controversial and she was not going there.