Hey dumbo, KaareV is Norwegian and his post is in support of Narve.
You mean he is saying Narve is as 'clean' as Katir?
KaareV has made numerous doping apologist posts as far as I can remember, accusing me of racism, and making clear he is another of the "who cares who is doping" people here that are an example of survivorship bias when it comes to current track fans (most fans having left the sport due to the doping).
As far as you remember??? I have never ever accused people of racism. I am actually not in that business.But here you accuse me. Your problem is actually that you are falt out wrong. You owe me an apology. And the other things you write about me??? - "who cares about doping"??? I can't remember that I have been in a discussion with you before.
So going from 3:34 to a hypothetical 3:32 in one season isn't really comparable to going from 3:36 to 3:28 in one season is it? Maybe you are on drugs too if you can't see that.
What about a course in logic - not at least informal - I was not predicting. And you looked up but did not manage to read it correctly. And I would never ever say that an athlete is clean. And i would not say that an athlete is using PED, until it is proven. Make sense, or make not sence. You are using the wrong word. The problem with common sense is that it all too common. Probability is a strange thing. This world do not move foreward with speculations.
Well by your own admission none us have a clue what you were talking about, then you tell me to write sense? How about you try to make your meaning clear, unless you are saying your post was just a verbal fart with no meaning?
So what exactly is ‘full-throttle’ EPO…is that less than, say ‘half-throttle’ or ‘partial throttle’ EPO? When you have a stroke, is full-throttle EPO confirmed? How much does your hemoglobin/HCT have to go up?
Well by your own admission none us have a clue what you were talking about, then you tell me to write sense? How about you try to make your meaning clear, unless you are saying your post was just a verbal fart with no meaning?
Again. You made an interpretation of what I wrote that was wrong. You made an ad hominem fallacy. And you wrote that you remembered that I called you a racist, which I never have done. So you owe med an apology.
Well by your own admission none us have a clue what you were talking about, then you tell me to write sense? How about you try to make your meaning clear, unless you are saying your post was just a verbal fart with no meaning?
Again. You made an interpretation of what I wrote that was wrong. You made an ad hominem fallacy. And you wrote that you remembered that I called you a racist, which I never have done. So you owe med an apology.
No, what you said has no meaning if you were simply asking some random question. You replied to a discussion where the issue is whether Katir dropping 8 seconds in one season is evidence of doping, and your reply was a question asking if a Norwegian dropping 4 seconds would be evidence of doping as well? Again, was this just a verbal fart? It only has meaing in the context of this thread. Any normal English speaking person would interpret your question as implying that we only think Katir is doping because of his nationality.
And yes, you have implied I'm a racist, it took 5 seconds to find that through search, although admittedly I may be confusing some old posts I attributed to you with another Norwegian commentator Halvard.
What about a course in logic - not at least informal - I was not predicting. And you looked up but did not manage to read it correctly. And I would never ever say that an athlete is clean. And i would not say that an athlete is using PED, until it is proven. Make sense, or make not sence. You are using the wrong word. The problem with common sense is that it all too common. Probability is a strange thing. This world do not move foreward with speculations.
I mean look at the above paragraph. It's gibberish. How can you complain we miss your point when you appear unable to express a coherent line of thought in English?
Again. You made an interpretation of what I wrote that was wrong. You made an ad hominem fallacy. And you wrote that you remembered that I called you a racist, which I never have done. So you owe med an apology.
No, what you said has no meaning if you were simply asking some random question. You replied to a discussion where the issue is whether Katir dropping 8 seconds in one season is evidence of doping, and your reply was a question asking if a Norwegian dropping 4 seconds would be evidence of doping as well? Again, was this just a verbal fart? It only has meaing in the context of this thread. Any normal English speaking person would interpret your question as implying that we only think Katir is doping because of his nationality.
And yes, you have implied I'm a racist, it took 5 seconds to find that through search, although admittedly I may be confusing some old posts I attributed to you with another Norwegian commentator Halvard.
"Any normal English speaking person would interpret your question as implying that we only think Katir is doping beacuse of his nationality"??? If so all of you ought to sue your school systems for not teaching you basics in logic reasoning. No, it did not take you 5 seconds. Because I am one of these persons who deplore such accusations. Again, I have never ever made such accusations. What you read into my texts is your problem. Get your school money back. And BTW 5 seconds not 4. And if it is going to be 6 seconds? Where do you draw the line? At 7 seconds, 8 seconds?
And yes, you have implied I'm a racist, it took 5 seconds to find that through search, although admittedly I may be confusing some old posts I attributed to you with another Norwegian commentator Halvard.
It took you 5 seconds to find evidence that he implied you're a racist but it was actually someone else?
And yes, you have implied I'm a racist, it took 5 seconds to find that through search, although admittedly I may be confusing some old posts I attributed to you with another Norwegian commentator Halvard.
It took you 5 seconds to find evidence that he implied you're a racist but it was actually someone else?
No, I found evidence that he had implied I was a racist, but the other occasions had been another Norwegian.
It took you 5 seconds to find evidence that he implied you're a racist but it was actually someone else?
No, I found evidence that he had implied I was a racist, but the other occasions had been another Norwegian.
This is hillarious. You did not find such an implication from me. It is nor TRUE. If so, just bring it on, but you can't. What is the problem to admit that you made a mistake? We all do. And then we go on.
So what exactly is ‘full-throttle’ EPO…is that less than, say ‘half-throttle’ or ‘partial throttle’ EPO? When you have a stroke, is full-throttle EPO confirmed? How much does your hemoglobin/HCT have to go up?
"Full throttle EPO" is unrestricted doping and not microdosing, as is more typical today because of tests for EPO and the bio passport.
So what exactly is ‘full-throttle’ EPO…is that less than, say ‘half-throttle’ or ‘partial throttle’ EPO? When you have a stroke, is full-throttle EPO confirmed? How much does your hemoglobin/HCT have to go up?
You can actually look up Ramzi's HCT values, and for example Kiptum's in comparison. And there's literature out there how much say 40 IU/kg raise your HCT, but not how much Ramzi took.
So what exactly is ‘full-throttle’ EPO…is that less than, say ‘half-throttle’ or ‘partial throttle’ EPO? When you have a stroke, is full-throttle EPO confirmed? How much does your hemoglobin/HCT have to go up?
"Full throttle EPO" is unrestricted doping and not microdosing, as is more typical today because of tests for EPO and the bio passport.
You clearly no nothing of medicine or science but you just keep trolling.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.