2600 bro wrote:
You don't have to agree with me but generally it would be expected that you respond to my arguments. A few thousand rioters/trespassers out of 10k Capitol protestors is vastly different from a few thousand rioters among 25 million BLM protestors.
We can take this argument to the extreme: If there were only a single Capitol invader, no one would care, just as if there were only a single BLM rioter.
The proportion of bad actors is what defines the perception of the protest.
Bullet_Proof wrote:
Nope. HitEmWithTheHein's and Rojo's posts were truthful and insightful and 2600Bro and you simply cant refute it. Instead you resort to petty digs at the website's potential to attract a wide audience. You know close to nothing about the website's traffic capacity and still wouldnt even if you got your hands on a Google Analytics account.
HitHimWithTheHein's post was great because it shows how the media + social media manipulates language and leaves key counter points out of its arguments. They are selective gas lighters. Kinds like Teddy a.k.a John Edward Gammel in Memento.
You left off a 0 in your number of Capital Protesters. There were at least 100,000 protesters there and the number is most likely around 500,000. They were protesting an election they perceived to be stolen based on mountains of evidence that the mainstream media didn't cover.