Gerry Manders wrote:
RIP PA gerrymandering.
https://whyy.org/articles/federal-judges-uphold-pennsylvanias-congressional-map-gerrymandering-case/
How adorable. A link from January. Might want to check this out after the fact.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/02/19/pennsylvania-supreme-court-draws-a-much-more-competitive-district-map-to-overturn-republican-gerrymander/?utm_term=.97eddfc13846https://www.thedailybeast.com/federal-judges-reject-gop-attempt-to-block-new-pennsylvania-mapRigged for Trump. wrote:
Gerry Manders wrote:
RIP PA gerrymandering.
https://whyy.org/articles/federal-judges-uphold-pennsylvanias-congressional-map-gerrymandering-case/How adorable. A link from January. Might want to check this out after the fact.
Rigged for Trump. wrote:
Might want to check this out after the fact.
From 03.19.18 2:10 PM ET. Less than 15 minutes old.
its real, real bad dude wrote:
its_baddude wrote:
Lets start a factual post here.
Libs
-----
We need to continue to investigate. There might me something somewhere that proves that Trump is colluding or doing something illegal. We don't know if he isn't guilty until we turn every rock on earth.
Leaks
-------
Obama government leaked Presidential conversations to the press.
Obama government spied on Trump officials with a false pretext.
Comey
---------
Claims he never authorized anyone to leak. Contradicted by Mccabe.
Mccabe goes down
-------------------------
Mccabe authorized leaks to Wall Street Journal about the Hillary investigation.
Mccabe lied about the leaking information.
Office of Professional Responsibility recommended his firing.
Waiting for IG report.
Lisa Page, Peter Strzok
-----------------------------
Conspiracy to undermine Trump. Plenty of texts to support that.
Fired from Mullers team.
Had relationship with FISA judge.
Judge removed from
Hillary and DNC
---------------------------
Hard to know where Hillary starts and DNC ends. Hillary/DNC paid the Russians for a fake dossier to use against Trump. Yes, there is nothing of value in the dossier.
Destroyed evidence, smashed phones, missing emails.
Held classified emails in non government issued server.
to be continued...
No one can respond to this series of facts because this thread isn't about analyzing the facts. It's about hope and constant speculation. All in the name of bringing our President down for defeating the establishment.
.
Name one person in this administration who is not a member of the establishment?
Fentrekker wrote:
its real, real bad dude wrote:
No one can respond to this series of facts because this thread isn't about analyzing the facts. It's about hope and constant speculation. All in the name of bringing our President down for defeating the establishment.
.
Name one person in this administration who is not a member of the establishment?
Donald Trump
DiscoGary wrote:
Fentrekker wrote:
Name one person in this administration who is not a member of the establishment?
Donald Trump
Nope. A registered Republicans, and political donor for years. Claims to know the ins and outs of government paperwork and taxes law biglier than anyone of all time.
DiscoGary wrote:
Fentrekker wrote:
Name one person in this administration who is not a member of the establishment?
Donald Trump
Hey, Lying Gary!!! You're back!
Bet you were so excited to jump in with your oh-so-clever response that you forgot to hide behind one of your little friends. Right, Lying Gary!
Hey, it's all the same, we're just glad to see you back and lying again!
Go get 'em, Lying Gary!
Repub Trump wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Donald Trump
Nope. A registered Republicans, and political donor for years. Claims to know the ins and outs of government paperwork and taxes law biglier than anyone of all time.
This must be a misunderstanding. Donald is a trans-politician. While other politicians ultimately work for the people and represent them, Trump only identifies himself with such establishment politicians, all the while claiming not to be one. He is unburdened since he is unaccountable by default as a trans-politician.
It is obvious you did not read your own link. "Republican leaders of the state legislature appealed the state case to the Supreme Court last month in a last-ditch effort to preserve the old map. This appeal is also a longshot. It’s the second time state Republicans have tried to get the Supreme Court to intervene. The first time, they were turned away by conservative Justice Samuel Alito."
Rigged for Trump. wrote:
Sir, I believe you dropped this.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/03/the-supreme-court-is-now-republicans-only-hope-of-restoring-pennsylvanias-gerrymander/
Flagpole wrote:
I agree. When I said it wasn't the focus, I meant not the focus for the "liberals" here. It still seems the other charges are the easiest to prove. i'm just being conservative here and not declaring that collusion will for sure be proven. I am definitely not saying that it WON'T be proven.
And I agree with you in that obstruction of justice and money laundering will be slam dunks for Mueller with conspiracy charges being more challenging. I hope Mueller hits a home run.
Gerry Manders wrote:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/federal-judges-reject-gop-attempt-to-block-new-pennsylvania-mapRigged for Trump. wrote:
How adorable. A link from January. Might want to check this out after the fact.
The sad part is, I'm pretty sure you two are agreeing and you just don't realize it
Again, the Cambridge Analytica connection is YUGE...
It's all unraveling for Trump and his associates.
nontrumper wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I agree. When I said it wasn't the focus, I meant not the focus for the "liberals" here. It still seems the other charges are the easiest to prove. i'm just being conservative here and not declaring that collusion will for sure be proven. I am definitely not saying that it WON'T be proven.
And I agree with you in that obstruction of justice and money laundering will be slam dunks for Mueller with conspiracy charges being more challenging. I hope Mueller hits a home run.
If Mueller does hit a home run, think of the existential dread that comes with knowing a foreign government successfully tricked enough US citizens into voting for someone like Trump (popular vote count notwithstanding of course), and the possibility of future interference and attacks.
The tweets of an innocent man....
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-doctors-quote-to-smear-comey-mueller-81e654762560/
...or unhinged, in-total-panic-mode man.
Take your pick.
Count Chocula wrote:
Gerry Manders wrote:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/federal-judges-reject-gop-attempt-to-block-new-pennsylvania-mapThe sad part is, I'm pretty sure you two are agreeing and you just don't realize it
District maps are a state law matter. That is why the SCOTUS rejected the case the first time. It will be rejected on appeal for the reason.
There’s been a lot of insider selling in Facebook lately. Sheryl Sanders sold $300M in stock just before this news came out. Was it all pre-arranged and part of their compensation plan? Or did they know about the Cambridge Analytica data breach?
Facebook stock is down bigly today.
Inquiring minds want to know wrote:
There’s been a lot of insider selling in Facebook lately. Sheryl Sanders sold $300M in stock just before this news came out. Was it all pre-arranged and part of their compensation plan? Or did they know about the Cambridge Analytica data breach?
Facebook stock is down bigly today.
Facebook allowed the Obama administration to mine the same kind of data for the 2012 election, so this is nothing new. It's just got them all bent out of shape because Bannon hired someone to do it too. The Democrats/social_media_giants are trying to figure out how to keep Republicans/conservatives from using social media against them. Right now they are censoring conservatives. Expect things to get more draconian than that. Left wing fascism is on the march.
DiscoGary wrote:
Inquiring minds want to know wrote:
There’s been a lot of insider selling in Facebook lately. Sheryl Sanders sold $300M in stock just before this news came out. Was it all pre-arranged and part of their compensation plan? Or did they know about the Cambridge Analytica data breach?
Facebook stock is down bigly today.
Facebook allowed the Obama administration to mine the same kind of data for the 2012 election, so this is nothing new.
I don't think I've heard that argument before. Can you go ahead and linked the extremely biased, likely false, and intentionally misleading blogs/"news sources"/podcasts so I can tell you where you went wrong?
Thanks!