Women runs 520 miles on treadmill in 7 days but doesn't get WR as Guinness says her witness doesn't count

He was the one trusted with verifying the distance. Shows a lack of attention to detail and organisation.

He also offers veiled threats to anyone that questions the claimed world records.

I just came here to share that I am annoyed every time this is bumped because of the (incorrect) plural usage of woman in the title. Very annoying. That is all.

LetsEatDoughnutsInstead wrote:

I just came here to share that I am annoyed every time this is bumped because of the (incorrect) plural usage of woman in the title. Very annoying. That is all.

"No women, no cry"

We are here, not to celebrate grammar mistakes, we are here to celebrate super scam woman Amy Hughes.

AnyMoreNews? wrote:

Have Samsung come back to you? Who did you contact? I'll send an email too.....

Yes. Two of us messaged their Facebook page. Took ages and hundreds of messages to get them to respond, but they said the info on Amy would be past to the "appropriate person".

But I don't trust them.

Their customer services is dreadful and hundreds of people screaming at them on Facebook.

easy boy wrote:

this is some next level creepiness.

not sure how it relates to his girlfriends fictional running claims.

Do keep up! David is a TRUSTEE of Amy's "charity" too, along with her dad.

They are drawing wages from these faked stunt runs.

Plus he was the, cough cough, "independent witness" at the treadmill scam.

It was thrown out as they realised he was her fiance, plus he cooked the books and fiddled the watch data, so Guinness threw it out.

I'm sorry but this has gone too far the other way. I don't think she ran 53marathons but you can't prove she didn't other than that she lies about holding a record as it was never ratified

I know she split some runs which to me does not count as s marathon. I also suspect she did not even do the full distance every day.

Most charities are just ways to make a business money and pay directors big wages with no tax.

I'm not really bothered if she's sponsored -those companies are not for athletes or serious runners

I doubt she'll ever try a genuine challenge. again. Once she said she had no need to compete in an ultra she'd give up on any running ambitions.

If YOU don't wish to follow this thread anymore, then GO.

Her "charity" is based on nothing but lies.

Getting money off people by lying about her faked achievements.

She won sponsorship from IdealFit UK due to LIES. She told them she ran 53 marathons and was the world record holder, amongst many other lies.

I got her dumped by them.

Now she is sponsored by Samsung Uk, spinning the SAME utter bulls*it.

Samsung is a major company and major sponsor. Are you mad, saying they aren't for athletes or serious runners ??

Why the hell should a lying cow like this get a funded lifestyle from her "charity" and sponsors, all on the back of LIES?

Plus she is doing talks in schools.

https://www.facebook.com/188981147892380/photos/a.269547399835754.1073741825.188981147892380/819269408196881/?type=3&theater

It's ridiculous.

You think we are just letting this go?

YOU go if you aren't interested anymore.

We will carry on getting her dumped by sponsors and getting the word out that she is a lying scamming fraud.

Because if we don't keep on her back, she WILL come up with another fake stunt run to make money for her "charity".

which one of you geniuses adjusted her wiki page to more accurately reflect the truth?

Techy Steve wrote:

I posted on her FB stating that I could analysis her footage and prove that she indeed broke the world record. I was blocked.

To this end, Amy and Dave, I'm writing to the press.

Good luck with your outing when it happens.

Steve the tech.

She has running watches. If she really had done 53 marathons she would be happily sharing the watch data.

By blocking you she totally proved she did NOT do these marathons.

Any joy with the press?

You need to write a few paragraphs outlining her scams.

No good just sending her this, it's too long.

Needs a write up PLUS this thread.

The accounts say they raised nearly 13 grand in a year and spent 6.7 grand.

So what did the rest get spent on?

wikilol wrote:

which one of you geniuses adjusted her wiki page to more accurately reflect the truth?

Not me! Wish I knew how! I'd change a few more things too!

I have no understanding why she is doing talks in schools, etc?

She's a total nobody.

Holds no records and has done hardly any races.

So she MUST be lying to absolutely everyone!

You sound a bit crazy.

I added a few bits, just to liven it up.... Never realised how easy it was to edit ?

You probably find Joseph accuses you of flaming, that's what happened to me. Removed a few of my changes.

Press story wrote:

The accounts say they raised nearly 13 grand in a year and spent 6.7 grand.

So what did the rest get spent on?

http://beta.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-details/?regid=1169380&subid=0

Most likely, it's just sitting in the bank. The bigger question is what did they spend £6.7k on (2016/17).

More interestingly though, updated accounts as of 31st Dec 2017 have been filed; look for the financials on the charities register in April. It will be interesting to see because she got most of her exposure in the last 6 months.

ukathleticscoach wrote:

You sound a bit crazy.

And you sound an f-ing weirdo.

You are always on this thread, and now say you want to leave it, yet you don't, you keep on posting.

If you don't want to follow this thread anymore, why don't you just LEAVE and never read it again.

I'm sick of these scamming stunt runners making a living off lies.

This thread exposing her is very useful.

Hopefully Samsung will be the next to dump her.

If that doesn't interest you then bore off as you are contributing nothing

Charity tracker wrote:

Press story wrote:

The accounts say they raised nearly 13 grand in a year and spent 6.7 grand.

So what did the rest get spent on?

http://beta.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-details/?regid=1169380&subid=0

Most likely, it's just sitting in the bank. The bigger question is what did they spend £6.7k on (2016/17).

More interestingly though, updated accounts as of 31st Dec 2017 have been filed; look for the financials on the charities register in April. It will be interesting to see because she got most of her exposure in the last 6 months.

I have asked them both where all the money went. It's not a hard question is it. If they were genuine they'd be happy to tell us.

Same as if the 53 marathons were genuine they would share the evidence.

I asked David what all the money has been spent on and he just replied "get a life".

Charming!

So i asked Amy's Facebook page and she read message, ignored me and blocked me........

Amy got a medal:

https://ibb.co/m5AH8S

1:55

Not exactly elite.

Dave Reading. wrote:

1:55

Not exactly elite.

But world class when it comes to scamming.