Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Yes - 27 here - age difference would be a problem, not to mention a little thing called marriage. I met someone I like recently, we'll see where it goes. You give me a standard to hold good men too so thank you for that. :)

Flagpole wrote:

Probably too old (I am 51), and I am happily married. There are other available men out there. Go find them!

Flagpole wrote:

L L wrote:

That may very well be.

There seems to be a hint that their is possible video evidence of sex and audio evidence of threats.

In the least, we know money was paid to her to not talk about Trump and Trump does not admit to any affair.

Those two things together do not make sense.

Yeah, it is all crazy. I'm pretty sure no one believes that Trump didn't have sex with Stormy Daniels.

Now that Stormy Daniels' attorney has said they have evidence of threats, I really hope they do have concrete evidence. This guy is horrible in just about every possible way I can think of. I guess we don't know that he has murdered anyone, and we don't yet have evidence that he abused children in any way, but holy crap he fails in every other marker of human decency.

Come on...! He deserves a second chance, that's why we support him unconditionally and why he leads us in prayer in the White House. Now Obama, that's a different kettle of fish all together. Evil incarnate.

Noticer of dominance wrote:

What planet do you live on and what mind-altering substances are you imbibing with such regularity? There were nine GOP Congressional investigations into Hillary Clinton and they did not find anything of note. This cost hardworking American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

President Obama was held accountable from Day one. The GOP was crucifying him from the get-go. One misstep in eight years and they would have pounced. They were an opposition at all costs front, the fruits of which we are reaping today with this extraordinarily corrupt administration.

You must have very few friends. You're completely delusional and it's become kind of sad.

DiscoGary wrote:

Hillary and Obama were not held accountable, Trump is being held accountable, just like I said he would be.

No one went after Obama because they were afraid of being called a racist. Obama was one of the most corrupt Presidents in history and he was NEVER held accountable. Obama's IRS suppression of Tea Party groups was probably the worst scandal in this country's history, and no one paid a price for it.

If you can not see that Obama was given a pass for 8 years and that Trump is being persecuted for things he has not done, then you do not see the world as it really is.

Trump is the best at everything even the 7 capital vices:

1 Lust

2 Gluttony

3 Greed

4 Sloth

5 Wrath

6 Envy

7 Pride

Noticer of dominance wrote:

Yes - 27 here - age difference would be a problem, not to mention a little thing called marriage. I met someone I like recently, we'll see where it goes. You give me a standard to hold good men too so thank you for that. :)

Flagpole wrote:

Probably too old (I am 51), and I am happily married. There are other available men out there. Go find them!

Cool. Good luck with your fella!

Do tell...

"It’s an embarrassingly inapt comparison," said Thomas Mann, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution. "We have as of yet to discover whether there was a scandal in the IRS. We certainly have no evidence that anything was done for a political reason and certainly no evidence that there was any intervention on the side of the White House."

IRS staff must decide what constitutes "political intervention" and how much is too much, a tough call that allows for extreme discretion, said Gabe Rottman, ACLU legislative counsel. That IRS employees had the discretion to screen applications based on keywords that caught more conservative groups than liberal groups is a serious problem, Rottman said.

"I have seen no evidence that the targeting was politically motivated, which is what Mr. Will is suggesting, if I read his comments correctly," Rottman said by email. "But, practically, the targeting did disproportionately affect critics of the administration."

Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, a Notre Dame Law School professor who studies nonprofit law, said the fact that Republican-led committees "are now focusing their accusations on a single, IRS career civil servant strongly suggests that they have failed to find any evidence to support accusing higher officials with wrongdoing despite investigating the exemption application mess for almost a full year."

Gary, you are supposed to break the pills IN HALF!

Noticer of dominance wrote:

Sure, babe.

http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/369488-rickroll

Master Obvious wrote:

Pics?

You da MAN!

DiscoGary wrote:

No one went after Obama because they were afraid of being called a racist. Obama was one of the most corrupt Presidents in history and he was NEVER held accountable. Obama's IRS suppression of Tea Party groups was probably the worst scandal in this country's history, and no one paid a price for it.

If you can not see that Obama was given a pass for 8 years and that Trump is being persecuted for things he has not done, then you do not see the world as it really is.

No one went after Obama because they were afraid of being called a racist.. Got it.

Thanks. Errr.... good luck with these loons.

Flagpole wrote:

Cool. Good luck with your fella!

Noticer of dominance wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

No one went after Obama because they were afraid of being called a racist. Obama was one of the most corrupt Presidents in history and he was NEVER held accountable. Obama's IRS suppression of Tea Party groups was probably the worst scandal in this country's history, and no one paid a price for it.

If you can not see that Obama was given a pass for 8 years and that Trump is being persecuted for things he has not done, then you do not see the world as it really is.

No one went after Obama because they were afraid of being called a racist.. Got it.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/02/politics/kentucky-republican-facebook-posts/index.html

In fairness to DG, he meant 'no one in the federal government went after Obama', not 'random idiots on Facebook'

I would ask you to reverse the rolls to see what you would think of a Trump administration using the IRS to suppress the formation of activist groups who disagree with him, but I know liberals lack imagination so you are unable to do this. You can not put yourself in the other person's place. You have no empathy, which is really the foundation of a civil society. This is why liberals always end up killing enormous numbers of people.

You are being fed just enough information to keep you agitated against people you are supposed to hate. You are kept from seeing the corruption of your own leaders. The world view they have created for you does not exist. I can not help you, but you could prove this to yourself even while confined to the liberal media rat maze they have created for you. To do this you have to commit heresy and question those big people in white lab coats throwing crumbs at you.

Ask yourself these questions:

1. Do the policies I support work? Not "Do the policies I support p!ss off people I hate?", but do they work?

2. Did Obama Care cut costs by $2,500 per family per year?

3. If not, why not? ... and don't cheat by believing that Republicans somehow caused the problems. That's just rat maze misdirection.

If your world view can not predict outcomes, if you have to constantly blame people who had nothing to do with it, if your leaders spend more time spinning failures than they spend celebrating victories, then something is wrong with your world view ... and it aint me.

DiscoGary wrote:

I would ask you to reverse the rolls to see what you would think of a Trump administration using the IRS to suppress the formation of activist groups who disagree with him...

You are a 100% imbecile. The "activist groups" were political fronts (entities) trying to pass themselves off as legitimate non-profits. Republican groups (Koch Bros, etc) created thousands of these. Far, far more of than any other group. So, a lot of them were caught trying to cheat on their taxes by not paying any (non-profits). It is easy to see why Republicans screamed to high heaven--their attempts to improperly finance their people was at grave risk. Now, what did Trump do? He has butchered the IRS to prevent it from having enough agents to stop political fronts from being properly audit and denied non-profit status. And the result now is that Republicans groups are creating a ton more of those bogus non-profits.

Again. No imagination. No empathy. Just hate.

DiscoGary wrote:

Another nothing burger by retardGary.

So we have a bunch of liberals here that believe Trump MUST be guilty of something, even though no evidence has been put forth, while Obama MUST be innocent even though his fingerprints were all over the IRS Tea Party scandal. You can do that, but no one should take you seriously because you are revealing yourselves as partisan hacks.

RepukeGary wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Another nothing burger by retardGary.

Just hit another dead-end in your maze huh? Gotta be frustrating.

Before this scandal broke, 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups were already making headlines for their political spending. Secretive nonprofits like Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS, the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity, and the American Action Network spent huge sums of money to influence the 2012 elections. Campaign watchdogs say those groups have flouted the law, which says 501(c)(4) groups can’t make politics their “primary purpose.” Watchdogs have demanded that the IRS and the Federal Election Commission crack down on these nonprofits for spending too much time and money on politics.

RepukeGary wrote:

Before this scandal broke, 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups were already making headlines for their political spending. Secretive nonprofits like Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS, the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity, and the American Action Network spent huge sums of money to influence the 2012 elections. Campaign watchdogs say those groups have flouted the law, which says 501(c)(4) groups can’t make politics their “primary purpose.” Watchdogs have demanded that the IRS and the Federal Election Commission crack down on these nonprofits for spending too much time and money on politics.