Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

truthseakr wrote:

Wrong Lamb....lol....

Connor Lamb is pro-gun..

Lamb is against more restrictions on assault rifles..

Lamb is pro-fracking..

Lamb is personally opposed to abortion..

Lamb is religious and pro-God...

Lamb is anti-Pelosi...

Lamb refrained from criticising Trump...

Most people would call these "Conservative values".

You are being way too hopeful here.

Fact is he is a Democrat. He will vote with the party the vast majority of the time. People in that conservative district where Trump won by almost 20 points (Trump said 22, but of course that was wrong and of course that was wrong in his favor), had a choice between the Republican candidate and the Democrat one, and they chose the Democrat.

Vote was an admonishment of Trump and Republicans, and deservedly so.

For those who like their news faked and their politicians unaccountable:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e5-zZEYEXZs

Probably won’t stay up forever. I particularly like the parts where Sweeney schools incompetent Russia TV crews.

Elections on Sunday. Expect more winning from Putin. The loser: everyone.

The link doesn’t make it clear but this is a BBC report from Wednesday.

Apparently there is evidence that Stormy was threatened physical harm by Trump or someone associated with Trump.

DiscoGary wrote:

Investigation wrote:

DG has ZERO clue what an investigation is.

A special council can only be created to investigate a crime. There was no crime specified for this special council, therefore it is illegal and should be disbanded.

Democrats = lawless

Again, what you are saying is not true, and you have been told this and shown this before.

I will try again:

"The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and—

(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and

(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter."

REPUBLICAN Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein determined that the criminal investigation needed to be continued (from fired Jim Comey's work) into Russia's meddling with our election.

Here is the order -

When speaking about this, Rosenstein said it would be in the public interest to appoint a Special Counsel, borrowing almost verbatim from (b) above.

THERE DOES NOT NEED TO BE A CRIME. It is only determined a crime AFTER THE INVESTIGATION.

Here is part of the order:

"The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confined by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:

* any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump

* and (ii)any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation

* and(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)."

The FBI had reason to begin this investigation, and the Deputy Attorney General (legally the Acting Attorney General) believed that Trump's firing of Comey, especially after Trump admitted that the Russia investigation was the reason for it, warranted a Special Counsel. He was right. Nothing untoward here.

You are simply wrong on this point (many others too, but I will focus on this one for this post).

L L wrote:

Apparently there is evidence that Stormy was threatened physical harm by Trump or someone associated with Trump.

I saw threatened, but in the story I read, her lawyer wouldn't say if it was Trump or someone close to him. Do you have another source?

I heard in speak on the radio.

The lawyer is saying to watch 60 Minutes on March 25 for more details.

But he is saying there is real evidence of a physical threat.

And there were additional NDA's paid for with other women.

Flagpole wrote:

L L wrote:

Apparently there is evidence that Stormy was threatened physical harm by Trump or someone associated with Trump.

I saw threatened, but in the story I read, her lawyer wouldn't say if it was Trump or someone close to him. Do you have another source?

They would have agreed to a Trump loyalty oath and non-disclosure arrangement. They acted on their own; their hero must be protected at all costs; the truth will not be told.

L L wrote:

I heard in speak on the radio.

The lawyer is saying to watch 60 Minutes on March 25 for more details.

But he is saying there is real evidence of a physical threat.

And there were additional NDA's paid for with other women.

I would keep in mind that this is probably at least a little bit of an attempt by Stormy Daniels to keep her name in the news and her stock high. She's likely never been as popular as she is now. Not saying the threatening didn't occur, but "subscribe to our YouTube channel for the exciting conclusion!!!"

L L wrote:

I heard in speak on the radio.

The lawyer is saying to watch 60 Minutes on March 25 for more details.

But he is saying there is real evidence of a physical threat.

And there were additional NDA's paid for with other women.

Ok. I don't doubt it. I did read that at least 6 more women came forward with similar stories to Stormy's.

I put nothing out of reach for this horrible human being of a President...he is completely amoral.

Racket wrote:

L L wrote:

I heard in speak on the radio.

The lawyer is saying to watch 60 Minutes on March 25 for more details.

But he is saying there is real evidence of a physical threat.

And there were additional NDA's paid for with other women.

I would keep in mind that this is probably at least a little bit of an attempt by Stormy Daniels to keep her name in the news and her stock high. She's likely never been as popular as she is now. Not saying the threatening didn't occur, but "subscribe to our YouTube channel for the exciting conclusion!!!"

It definitely does do that to tease us a little bit with waiting until March 25.

Ultimately I have no problem with it if she benefits monetarily from this as long as the TRUTH comes out about what Trump and or his henchmen did.

Racket wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

There were no investigations into Benghazi, nothing serious anyway.

lol wut?

Yeah, Lying Gary is really losing it. Lying Gary's posts are so lame now that I almost pity him.

Poor Lying Gary.

Flagpole wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

A special council can only be created to investigate a crime. There was no crime specified for this special council, therefore it is illegal and should be disbanded.

Democrats = lawless

Again,what you are saying is not true, and you have been told this and shown this before.

I will try again:

. . .

There is a reason that he is referred to as Lying Gary (as opposed to Clueless Gary).

“If we are going to cloister ourselves in the alternative truth of an erratic leader, if we are going to refuse to live in the world that everyone else lives in and reckon with the daily reality that they face, including the very real anxiety that they feel, then my party might not deserve to lead.”

--Republican Jeff Flake

Truth Bomb! wrote:

“If we are going to cloister ourselves in the alternative truth of an erratic leader, if we are going to refuse to live in the world that everyone else lives in and reckon with the daily reality that they face, including the very real anxiety that they feel, then my party might not deserve to lead.”

--Republican Jeff Flake

He is right. So weird that such a traditional Republican like Flake is so unwelcomed by his party now.

Racket wrote:

I would keep in mind that this is probably at least a little bit of an attempt by Stormy Daniels to keep her name in the news and her stock high. She's likely never been as popular as she is now. Not saying the threatening didn't occur, but "subscribe to our YouTube channel for the exciting conclusion!!!"

That may very well be.

There seems to be a hint that their is possible video evidence of sex and audio evidence of threats.

In the least, we know money was paid to her to not talk about Trump and Trump does not admit to any affair.

Those two things together do not make sense.

L L wrote:

Racket wrote:

I would keep in mind that this is probably at least a little bit of an attempt by Stormy Daniels to keep her name in the news and her stock high. She's likely never been as popular as she is now. Not saying the threatening didn't occur, but "subscribe to our YouTube channel for the exciting conclusion!!!"

That may very well be.

There seems to be a hint that their is possible video evidence of sex and audio evidence of threats.

In the least, we know money was paid to her to not talk about Trump and Trump does not admit to any affair.

Those two things together do not make sense.

Yeah, it is all crazy. I'm pretty sure no one believes that Trump didn't have sex with Stormy Daniels.

Now that Stormy Daniels' attorney has said they have evidence of threats, I really hope they do have concrete evidence. This guy is horrible in just about every possible way I can think of. I guess we don't know that he has murdered anyone, and we don't yet have evidence that he abused children in any way, but holy crap he fails in every other marker of human decency.

Sure, babe.http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/369488-rickroll

Master Obvious wrote:

Pics?

There, there now. Let out the hurt. Projection of your internal weakness onto others is a powerful coping mechanism.

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole is a pitifully deranged human being who believes that he can wish things into existence with just the power of his mind. He deserves our compassion and any mental health assistance we can give him.