Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

I guess the question is - what would it take for House Republics to vote to impeach before the November elections?

nontrumper wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I THINK you are correct here, but I don't want to put a time frame on anything. Also, Mueller can subpoena Trump at some point and then he will have to testify.

I believe at some point enough evidence will be released and/or one to many indictments unsealed that Congress won't have a choice. We (the public) are getting just enough to prepare us for the real bomb shells that haven't been fired.

I do hope it happens soon enough that a GOP House will start impeachment proceedings and not before a possible shift to the Dems in November.

I believe you are right. I also agree it would be nice if it happened sooner than later and for the same reason you mention, but I will take Trump's legal ouster whenever it comes.

Flagpole wrote:

Also, Mueller can subpoena Trump at some point and then he will have to testify.

Well he just subpoenaed the Trump Organization so...

Flagpole wrote:

nontrumper wrote:

I believe at some point enough evidence will be released and/or one to many indictments unsealed that Congress won't have a choice. We (the public) are getting just enough to prepare us for the real bomb shells that haven't been fired.

I do hope it happens soon enough that a GOP House will start impeachment proceedings and not before a possible shift to the Dems in November.

I believe you are right. I also agree it would be nice if it happened sooner than later and for the same reason you mention, but I will take Trump's legal ouster whenever it comes.

Speaking of impeachment, did you guys notice last week that Trump was in talks with Emmet Flood, an impeachment expert, who Clinton hired? I haven't heard if Flood took Trump's offer or not.

The investigations continues to close in on Trump and note that Mueller didn't ask for the documents, he subpoenaed them.

Racket wrote:

Well he just subpoenaed the Trump Organization so...

Well, that's an interesting development.

L L wrote:

Racket wrote:

Well he just subpoenaed the Trump Organization so...

Well, that's an interesting development.

Let's assume that the following occurred:

1. Trump's team destroys the hard drives of computers containing the subpoenaed information using Bleach Bit, and then puts them through a grinder.

2. Trump's team deletes 30 thousand subpoenaed emails and claims they were all about family vacations and such.

You liberals would be OK with that right?

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

Well, that's an interesting development.

Let's assume that the following occurred:

1. Trump's team destroys the hard drives of computers containing the subpoenaed information using Bleach Bit, and then puts them through a grinder.

2. Trump's team deletes 30 thousand subpoenaed emails and claims they were all about family vacations and such.

You liberals would be OK with that right?

Sure. Tell his team to go ahead.

Liberal man wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Let's assume that the following occurred:

1. Trump's team destroys the hard drives of computers containing the subpoenaed information using Bleach Bit, and then puts them through a grinder.

2. Trump's team deletes 30 thousand subpoenaed emails and claims they were all about family vacations and such.

You liberals would be OK with that right?

Sure. Tell his team to go ahead.

I hope he does.

Have them delete 30,000 tweets while they’re at it.

Liberal man wrote:

Have them delete 30,000 tweets while they’re at it.

Twitter is already doing that.

Hopefully they are being paid well for that service.

Hopefully they are being paid well for that service.

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

Well, that's an interesting development.

Let's assume that the following occurred:

1. Trump's team destroys the hard drives of computers containing the subpoenaed information using Bleach Bit, and then puts them through a grinder.

2. Trump's team deletes 30 thousand subpoenaed emails and claims they were all about family vacations and such.

You liberals would be OK with that right?

1) I wasn't ok with it when Hillary took evasive action.

2) I won't be ok with it if Trump or his employees do it, but only because I want the truth (and you should too).

3) It won't go well for Trump if he or his employees evade or obstruct, so as far as that goes, it doesn't bother me, but again, I want the truth, not just Trump getting in trouble for obstruction.

Mueller is coming (indisputable at this point).

The clown is done.

Flagpole wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Let's assume that the following occurred:

1. Trump's team destroys the hard drives of computers containing the subpoenaed information using Bleach Bit, and then puts them through a grinder.

2. Trump's team deletes 30 thousand subpoenaed emails and claims they were all about family vacations and such.

You liberals would be OK with that right?

1) I wasn't ok with it when Hillary took evasive action.

2) I won't be ok with it if Trump or his employees do it, but only because I want the truth (and you should too).

3) It won't go well for Trump if he or his employees evade or obstruct, so as far as that goes, it doesn't bother me, but again, I want the truth, not just Trump getting in trouble for obstruction.

Mueller is coming (indisputable at this point).

The clown is done.

Would you say Mueller has, in fact, arrived?

DiscoGary wrote:

Liberal man wrote:

Sure. Tell his team to go ahead.

I hope he does.

Because you know he's crooked and you want him to hide it. Why do you support such a crooked horrible man?

Racket wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) I wasn't ok with it when Hillary took evasive action.

2) I won't be ok with it if Trump or his employees do it, but only because I want the truth (and you should too).

3) It won't go well for Trump if he or his employees evade or obstruct, so as far as that goes, it doesn't bother me, but again, I want the truth, not just Trump getting in trouble for obstruction.

Mueller is coming (indisputable at this point).

The clown is done.

Would you say Mueller has, in fact, arrived?

He has arrived as in he has shown up at the door, but he hasn't yet arrived as in reached a decision or conclusion, so I will refrain from using that word until he does deliver his conclusion.

The spirit of your question is good, however, and Trump supporters should be worried (they should have been worried a long time ago as I have been telling them).

Last year Trump said that looking into his finances would be crossing a red line.

And Mueller thought that Trump making that statement was a red flag.

I assume Mueller can get IRS filings and bank statements and records that Trump could not destroy.

As for emails, you can only delete your own emails, not the other parties in the conversation.

There could be people holding onto damaging emails that Trump cannot erase.

Though, I think it's common knowledge not to document illegal activities through emails, so he'd have to be a fckng moron to do that.

Wait ...

L L wrote:

Last year Trump said that looking into his finances would be crossing a red line.

And Mueller thought that Trump making that statement was a red flag.

I assume Mueller can get IRS filings and bank statements and records that Trump could not destroy.

Mueller has had the support of the IRS since September of last year. The IRS staff assigned to the investigation is large--I do not recall the number exactly, but a lot more than have been constantly auditing Trump's return for the last 20 years.

"The IRS has sole jurisdiction over pure tax crimes. But when an investigation moves past that, there are crimes, like money laundering, that the IRS works with the FBI on."

Well, he is Russia-born, an ex-con, a mobster, and expert money launderer. Oh, and he is a former business partner of Trump's.

https://www.thenation.com/article/who-is-felix-sater-and-why-is-donald-trump-so-afraid-of-him/

https://investigaterussia.org/players/felix-sater