Sorry, I'd prefer to focus on the most irresponsible SECDEF nomination in the history of the position. By at least a mile.
The current Sec Def went missing for weeks and didn't tell anyone while our ships were being attacked by Houthis.
Yep, and because I'm way better than you in so many ways, I'll tell you that, from what I know about it (not a ton, but perhaps enough), Austin handled his medical issues horribly. Apparently did things that he NEVER would have tolerated in any subordinate across his long career (something quite common in flag officers). He probably or certainly should have been relieved.
See how FREAKIN' easy that is?
And guess how much Austin's behavior excuses Trump from a monumentally irresponsible SECDEF nomination? Or the cowardly Senators supporting it? Not one iota.
But I'll answer anyhow: Because idiots exactly like you were immaturely and/or ignorantly sniping on it. And OTHER idiots were persuaded by that ("Yeah, us f****** up the climate MUST be wrong because it's not always more hot !!!").
So they changed it. They changed it because you're stupid.
But the EPA website was calling it Global Warming on its website up until 2000 when the temps quit warming for a number of years.
what? you didn't bring up that one Time article from the 70s talking about global cooling?
As I mentioned before you are dumb. The temps didn't quit warming, they were just warming at a slighter lower ran than expected.
"natural variability (such as the patterns described in this article) may cause the rate of warming to change from one decade to the next, but global warming is still underway
If they had known for decades, why were they calling it Global Warming instead of Climate Change for many, many years?
But I'll answer anyhow: Because idiots exactly like you were immaturely and/or ignorantly sniping on it. And OTHER idiots were persuaded by that ("Yeah, us f****** up the climate MUST be wrong because it's not always more hot !!!").
So they changed it. They changed it because you're stupid.
This, actually. Okay, Sally knows better and is just trolling, but there were too many ignoramuses who thought, for real, that a single unusually hot day--or season, for that matter--established global warming and a single cold gainsaid it.
It’s funny that right wingers wholeheartedly embrace Tulsi now. She used to be a Democrat (the enemy). All it takes is a little Russian love and Trumps rehabilitation and she is now good to go. Pooty will have his traitorous plant running out National security.
What could possibly go wrong?
Trump used to be a Democrat too.
MAGA!
he used to be a republican and an independent too. Trump is for one party himself.
Sorry, I'd prefer to focus on the most irresponsible SECDEF nomination in the history of the position. By at least a mile.
Our beloved Al Gore said famously that 2016 was the "tipping point" in our battle against Global Warming. What year do you think he will say will be the "tipping point" in the battle against Global Cooling? 2155? Will he make another movie gorgonizing us about the coming Global Cooling and how we are all doomed? We seemed to have survived the Global Warming hysteria.
Trumpism, to me, was proof positive that America won't ever address climate change. If a country can't REALLY easily see that Trump is horrendous, how the hell is one EVER going to talk them into ANY sacrifices for something far harder to understand than a horrible criminal fat man lying to their face? You ain't.
But the EPA website was calling it Global Warming on its website up until 2000 when the temps quit warming for a number of years.
what? you didn't bring up that one Time article from the 70s talking about global cooling?
As I mentioned before you are dumb. The temps didn't quit warming, they were just warming at a slighter lower ran than expected.
"natural variability (such as the patterns described in this article) may cause the rate of warming to change from one decade to the next, but global warming is still underway
We had a Global Warming hiatus from 1998 to 2013. And that is even with all the temperature-doctoring that Global Warming "scientists" like to do.
Our beloved Al Gore said famously that 2016 was the "tipping point" in our battle against Global Warming. What year do you think he will say will be the "tipping point" in the battle against Global Cooling? 2155? Will he make another movie gorgonizing us about the coming Global Cooling and how we are all doomed? We seemed to have survived the Global Warming hysteria.
Trumpism, to me, was proof positive that America won't ever address climate change. If a country can't REALLY easily see that Trump is horrendous, how the hell is one EVER going to talk them into ANY sacrifices for something far harder to understand than a horrible criminal fat man lying to their face? You ain't.
The CO2 Carbon emissions for the US have been drastically curtailed. The rest of the world (India, China, etc.) not so much.
This, actually. Okay, Sally knows better and is just trolling, but there were too many ignoramuses who thought, for real, that a single unusually hot day--or season, for that matter--established global warming and a single cold gainsaid it.
Two of these ignoramuses are the incoming president and his coke loving spawn who regularly repost idiotic memes to deceive millions of loyal red cappers.
Trump has moved his hysterical inauguration ceremony INDOORS to an arena that seats 20,000 (Capital One). Will he claim he squeezed more than 1,000,000 in there? How about 100,000? Or will he claim he had to turn the masses of worshippers away? Anything but an outdoor event showing mostly empty space.
Trumpism, to me, was proof positive that America won't ever address climate change. If a country can't REALLY easily see that Trump is horrendous, how the hell is one EVER going to talk them into ANY sacrifices for something far harder to understand than a horrible criminal fat man lying to their face? You ain't.
The CO2 Carbon emissions for the US have been drastically curtailed. The rest of the world (India, China, etc.) not so much.
OK, granted, perhaps I understated what the U.S. has done. But is it really as much as we ought to do? Maybe, but probably not.
I do highly suspect this: MUCH of what we've done has been the result of responsible people in government (and MAYBE industry here and there?) doing the "right" thing. Not our wise populace insisting on action.
After seeing at least the last 10 years and 3 elections, I'm certain that the response from 45-50% of Americans to a referendum on climate change action would be, "F*** no, it's just radical leftist lib propaganda!!! I NEED my gas F-150 Drill baby, drill !!!"
Trump has moved his hysterical inauguration ceremony INDOORS to an arena that seats 20,000 (Capital One). Will he claim he squeezed more than 1,000,000 in there? How about 100,000? Or will he claim he had to turn the masses of worshippers away? Anything but an outdoor event showing mostly empty space.
He might claim the cold temps are a Soros funded event to make his historic crowds look small,
Either that or he will claim anyone that was watching TV at any time during the inauguration (even if it is General Hospital) needs to be included in his attendance estimates.
The CO2 Carbon emissions for the US have been drastically curtailed. The rest of the world (India, China, etc.) not so much.
OK, granted, perhaps I understated what the U.S. has done. But is it really as much as we ought to do? Maybe, but probably not.
I do highly suspect this: MUCH of what we've done has been the result of responsible people in government (and MAYBE industry here and there?) doing the "right" thing. Not our wise populace insisting on action.
After seeing at least the last 10 years and 3 elections, I'm certain that the response from 45-50% of Americans to a referendum on climate change action would be, "F*** no, it's just radical leftist lib propaganda!!! I NEED my gas F-150 Drill baby, drill !!!"
Sure the rednecks want their F-150s but who is it flying around the world in their jets and cruising in their yachts when they pretend they are "eco-warriors?" yeah - Leo Di, and Zuckerberg, Stephen Spielberg, Jeff Bezos, Taylor Swift. Zuck has a 150 million dollar support yacht to carry his toys for his $500 million super yacht. Eco-warrior Leo Di takes his copter from his mega-yacht to have a cup of tea in Italy. They are all phonies.
In an interview with Wall Street Journal Editor in Chief Emma Tucker, the Microsoft co-founder said he and the president-elect discussed HIV, polio and global health.
Don't worry Dapper Pete is going to get rid of that woke crap in DoD. When he's not drinking to excess, fixing his hair, or perhaps threatening Greenland.
Only the best !!!
If they had known for decades, why were they calling it Global Warming instead of Climate Change for many, many years?
Different names have been used over time to describe man-made changes to the Earth's climate. Therefore it is impossible for human activities to significantly impact the Earth's climate.
Our beloved Al Gore said famously that 2016 was the "tipping point" in our battle against Global Warming. What year do you think he will say will be the "tipping point" in the battle against Global Cooling? 2155? Will he make another movie gorgonizing us about the coming Global Cooling and how we are all doomed? We seemed to have survived the Global Warming hysteria.
Al Gore.
Therefore it is impossible for human activities to significantly impact the Earth's climate.
