truthseakr wrote:
Hey...I love Walmart......Where ya gonna find underwear 6 for $10.00...
And speaking of Lying Gary, here he is.
How goes it, Lying Gary?
truthseakr wrote:
Hey...I love Walmart......Where ya gonna find underwear 6 for $10.00...
And speaking of Lying Gary, here he is.
How goes it, Lying Gary?
And Speaking of wrote:
truthseakr wrote:
Hey...I love Walmart......Where ya gonna find underwear 6 for $10.00...
And speaking of Lying Gary, here he is.
How goes it, Lying Gary?
I still think it's more likely to be exthrower. Excessive use of ellipses is kind of a dead giveaway
Racket wrote:
And Speaking of wrote:
And speaking of Lying Gary, here he is.
How goes it, Lying Gary?
I still think it's more likely to be exthrower. Excessive use of ellipses is kind of a dead giveaway
DiscoGary = exthrower = truthseakr
They are the same wanker (tosser)
Good night for Democrats. A Blue Wave is coming. The clown is done.
Blue Wave is Coming wrote:
Good night for Democrats. A Blue Wave is coming. The clown is done.
Lol.....That's what you dummies said before Trumps victory.....and now you are just bitter losers....
truthseakr wrote:
Blue Wave is Coming wrote:
Good night for Democrats. A Blue Wave is coming. The clown is done.
We Trumpkins are just bitter losers....
The Trumpkins are in a YUGE panic. Trump Country is turning blue. It is time for all Trumpkins at amass in the Dakotas where they can build a wall around themselves, and elect Trump as their dictator for life!!!!!!!
Racket wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Again, you are on thin ice with regard to me responding to you. I won't deal with too much craziness or ignorance, and since I've called you out twice now with regard to that, any further posts from you that don't show growth will almost certainly get a non-response from me.
You realize who you're talking to right? I'd put more money on DiscoGary becoming a liberal than jamin ever showing an ounce of growth.
I'm not hoping for or expecting growth. I'm just telling him why he might not get any responses from me in the future. By the way, I see people mention him all the time, but I honestly hardly ever read his posts because he doesn't post frequently on topics I am interested in. So, until now I didn't have an opinion of him.
Flagpole wrote:
It IS illegal for a candidate to collude (conspire) with a foreign power to influence an election.
Federal law Section 30121 of Title 52, makes it a crime for any foreigner to contribute or donate money or some “other thing of value” in connection with an American election, or for anyone to solicit a foreigner to do so. Courts have determined that a “thing of value” can be something intangible, like information.
Ok, we're getting somewhere.
(1) You admit that there is no such crime as "Collusion."
(2) You point to some vague law, that there is no evidence of being violated.
(3) You don't even provide an explanation of how/why you think this law was violated. You seem to believe the whole theory that "Trump had some back channel with Putin who's his secret friend and Putin had some connection to oligarchs with troll farms and there was some deal where Putin's end of the deal was to use his friends to influence the election through trolling." Can you explain this theory in specific terms so we can understand it?
Out of curiosity, how many hours of Rick Maddow do you watch every week?
$43,000 for a Cone of Silence for Trump's EPA clown???? LOL . . . such a bigly good deal for Trump. He can route calls to Pruitt's Cone of Silence and have Pruitt directed to Putin. Why else would someone at the EPA require such a Cone????
jamin wrote:
Ok, we're getting somewhere.
You and Hardloper is we're????
jamin wrote:
(1) You admit that there is no such crime as "Collusion."
Letting Hardloper borrow your LRC id, again?
https://thelawdictionary.org/collusion/https://sidebarsblog.com/collusion-russians-influence-election-crime/jamin wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
It IS illegal for a candidate to collude (conspire) with a foreign power to influence an election.
Federal law Section 30121 of Title 52, makes it a crime for any foreigner to contribute or donate money or some “other thing of value” in connection with an American election, or for anyone to solicit a foreigner to do so. Courts have determined that a “thing of value” can be something intangible, like information.
Ok, we're getting somewhere.
(1) You admit that there is no such crime as "Collusion."
(2) You point to some vague law, that there is no evidence of being violated.
(3) You don't even provide an explanation of how/why you think this law was violated. You seem to believe the whole theory that "Trump had some back channel with Putin who's his secret friend and Putin had some connection to oligarchs with troll farms and there was some deal where Putin's end of the deal was to use his friends to influence the election through trolling." Can you explain this theory in specific terms so we can understand it?
Out of curiosity, how many hours of Rick Maddow do you watch every week?
Point 1 appears to be a figment of your imagination as no such admission was made. Points 2 and 3 are mostly why there's currently an investigation. You know, to collect evidence and see if laws are violated.
The Dow is down 250 points today and is now basically flat for 2018.
Thanks a lot Trump!
Oh yeah, and...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
To those saying it wasn't Russia, you're implying that this former Russian spy/traitor who was 100% guaranteed to be under Russian surveillance was murdered in a public place with a weapon created by the Russians to cause anger at Russia and Putin.
I mean, ffs guys, ya hear hooves, think horses not zebras. Just f**king think for a second, yeh? I still find it hilarious that Republicans, whose bread and butter for like 40+years was "Don't be a Commie! Go America!" "Russia is scary!" "There could be a secret communist in your neighborhood!" and sh*t like that. Now you're all over that Russian D. What the F*k is wrong with you dingalings?
Flagpole, just admit that what is being investigated is being made up as time goes on.
They're working hard to find SOMETHING to construe as violating a law (remember that the average American commits 3 felonies per day without knowing it. We don't live in a nation of laws.) and they'll say "See, this is what we were alleging all along."
jamin wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
It IS illegal for a candidate to collude (conspire) with a foreign power to influence an election.
Federal law Section 30121 of Title 52, makes it a crime for any foreigner to contribute or donate money or some “other thing of value” in connection with an American election, or for anyone to solicit a foreigner to do so. Courts have determined that a “thing of value” can be something intangible, like information.
Ok, we're getting somewhere.
(1) You admit that there is no such crime as "Collusion."
(2) You point to some vague law, that there is no evidence of being violated.
(3) You don't even provide an explanation of how/why you think this law was violated. You seem to believe the whole theory that "Trump had some back channel with Putin who's his secret friend and Putin had some connection to oligarchs with troll farms and there was some deal where Putin's end of the deal was to use his friends to influence the election through trolling." Can you explain this theory in specific terms so we can understand it?
Out of curiosity, how many hours of Rick Maddow do you watch every week?
From Russia state TV: "Yesterday, Tillerson supported Theresa May in her 'highly likely' [Skripal poisoning] allegation. So Trump immediately fired him. Trump is ours!"
Trump is probably the only ally of the UK to not comment on the poisoning. Wonder why?
Jamin, how many hours of InfoWars and Fox News do you watch each week?
As I said before, you're a simpleton. You've obviously made no real effort to read about Mueller's investigation. It doesn't take much effort and you don't have to read the Huffington Post or watch Maddow.
Michael B. Hari, 47, was arrested and charged Tuesday in federal court in lllinois with arson and possession of machine guns.
The Illinois contractor bidding to build President Donald Trump’s wall on the Mexican border was among three men arrested Tuesday in connection with the bombing of a mosque in Minnesota and the attempted bombing of a women’s health clinic in Illinois.
jamin wrote:
Flagpole, just admit that what is being investigated is being made up as time goes on.
You have absolutely no clue what an investigation is. ... Hint: The results are not predetermined.
Speaking of yesterday's PA election:
From Tom Nichols, a conservative: "Democrats, I am pleading with you: take the right message from your PA 18 win. (HINT: Run center-left candidates who speak respectfully to a wide group of voters, who are not purity-tested out of a primary, and have a platform besides TRUMP IS TOTALLY HITLER.)"
I wish both parties would take this to heart.