Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Did you see the vid? wrote:

L L wrote:

You go to Fox news right now and the big headline story is some piece on Hillary.

They are really obsessed with her. I guess they planned on her being president and wanted to write bad things about her constantly and are having withdrawal.

It's because she was in India giving a talk on something, and went into "why she lost" again. She again used the pre-election narratives, ignoring the fact that she lost the following groups:

1) the suburbs

2) every income category over $50K

3) white women

4) white college graduates

I didn't say it was worth reporting.

But the Hillary story was plastered as the big big Fox headline.

And ironically, they also have a headline of how the Democrats won't let the witch hunt of Trump go.

At least Hillary gave hours of testimony under oath.

Trump has yet t be interviewed.

They want the Russia investigation dropped without questioning or interviewing Trump even once.

DiscoGary wrote:

Yup. The House investigation found no evidence of collusion. Normally you would say that this is just Republicans find big their own guy innocent, but Republicans do t line Trump any more than Democrats, so this is a much bigger deal than most people think it is.

Correction: House REPUBLICANS on the intelligence committee apparently found no evidence of collusion. And one Republican actually disagreed about their assessment, acknowledging that the Russians did interfere.

Isn't it odd that the House committee never interviewed Flynn, Papadopoulos, Manafort, or Gates? All have indictments. Three of the four are cooperating with Mueller.

It was a farce. Nunes will be dealing with his own indictment in due time.

Fortunately, Mueller and his team were still at work early this morning. Rule of law will prevail.

Did you see the vid? wrote:

L L wrote:

You go to Fox news right now and the big headline story is some piece on Hillary.

They are really obsessed with her. I guess they planned on her being president and wanted to write bad things about her constantly and are having withdrawal.

It's because she was in India giving a talk on something, and went into "why she lost" again. She again used the pre-election narratives, ignoring the fact that she lost the following groups:

1) the suburbs

2) every income category over $50K

3) white women

4) white college graduates

In other words...Everyone with brains didn't vote for her...lol.....

truthseakr wrote:

Did you see the vid? wrote:

It's because she was in India giving a talk on something, and went into "why she lost" again. She again used the pre-election narratives, ignoring the fact that she lost the following groups:

1) the suburbs

2) every income category over $50K

3) white women

4) white college graduates

In other words...Everyone with brains didn't vote for her...lol.....

Now THAT was a clever retort, Lying Gary! (by your standards, anyway)

.

.

.

.

.

Lying Gary

Jeff Wigand wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Yup. The House investigation found no evidence of collusion. Normally you would say that this is just Republicans find big their own guy innocent, but Republicans do t line Trump any more than Democrats, so this is a much bigger deal than most people think it is.

Why would you believe them now? You didn't believe them when the Republican-led House Oversight Committee found no link between the Obama White House and the IRS Targeting scandal.

Because Establishment Republicans would be expected to clear Obama while trying to take down Trump. They are part of the swamp along with Obama. Trump is not.

L L wrote:

You go to Fox news right now and the big headline story is some piece on Hillary.

They are really obsessed with her. I guess they planned on her being president and wanted to write bad things about her constantly and are having withdrawal.

Hillary keeps insulting Trump voters, which is why she lost, and why she's still in the news. She is not helping your cause. Someone should tell her to shut that down.

DiscoGary wrote:

Establishment Republicans ... are part of the swamp ... Trump is not.

LOL . . .

0/10, troll.

Put the vodka down, Russian Gary.

DiscoGary wrote:

Because Establishment Republicans would be expected to clear Obama while trying to take down Trump. They are part of the swamp along with Obama. Trump is not.

The same Republicans that rolled over and approved Merrick Garland for the US Supreme Court? That passed comprehensive immigration reform? That passed increased gun control and an automatic weapons ban? That gave Obama "everything he asked for," as you've written on many occasions?

Republicans made it clear that they would do everything they could to keep Obama from having a successful presidency. This is why investigations into the IRS and Benghazi went on and on, despite the people out to find dirt on Obama coming up empty handed. But now those same people in power, who are terrified of Trump's ardent supporters, such as yourself, who will follow Trump off a cliff, abruptly end their investigation into possible collusion with the Russians without interviewing several key witnesses and against the findings of US intelligence.

Trump is the swamp, personified. He just fired his longtime PA over alleged financial crimes only to rehire him to work on his re-election campaign.

Just admit that your bias is so strong that you're incapable of objective thought.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Jeff Wigand wrote:

Why would you believe them now? You didn't believe them when the Republican-led House Oversight Committee found no link between the Obama White House and the IRS Targeting scandal.

He believes them now because this is Nunes' rubber stamp. Remember Nunes? He's the guy that fluffed a memo that made the FBI look like they were doing their job while offering evidence of a campaign influenced by Russian interests. He's also the guy that, as head of the committee and investigation, took evidence he thought relevant directly to the White House.

The House committee investigation was a fascist circus from the start.

Don't forget that Devin Nunes was part of the Trump campaign's transition team. I'm not saying that necessarily makes him a fierce partisan, but that certainly is a conflict of interest.

nontrumper wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Yup. The House investigation found no evidence of collusion. Normally you would say that this is just Republicans find big their own guy innocent, but Republicans do t line Trump any more than Democrats, so this is a much bigger deal than most people think it is.

Correction: House REPUBLICANS on the intelligence committee apparently found no evidence of collusion. And one Republican actually disagreed about their assessment, acknowledging that the Russians did interfere.

Isn't it odd that the House committee never interviewed Flynn, Papadopoulos, Manafort, or Gates? All have indictments. Three of the four are cooperating with Mueller.

It was a farce. Nunes will be dealing with his own indictment in due time.

Fortunately, Mueller and his team were still at work early this morning. Rule of law will prevail.

This. The perimeter around DJT is closing by the day. Fewer allies, fewer defenders, and more evidence of something.

There is no point in arguing w/ people who twist themselves into increasingly convoluted positions to defend the indefensible.

Remember when Republicans demanded independent councils for all of Obama's scandals? That's right. There were none, and Republicans did not call for any. They are part of the swamp.

Hi Dude wrote:

Now THAT was a clever retort, Lying Gary! (by your standards, anyway)

truthseakr and DiscoGary aren't the same person. It's Lying Exthrower.

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

You go to Fox news right now and the big headline story is some piece on Hillary.

They are really obsessed with her. I guess they planned on her being president and wanted to write bad things about her constantly and are having withdrawal.

Hillary keeps insulting Trump voters, which is why she lost, and why she's still in the news. She is not helping your cause. Someone should tell her to shut that down.

Since a politician (and a terminally ill one, at that) saying unkind things about Trump voters merits front page coverage, I wonder why Fox News hasn't covered the quote below at all, considering how they strive to be fair and balanced:

“I’ve talked to so many of these on the left,” Saccone said. “And they have a hatred for our president. And I tell you, many of them have a hatred for our country. I’ll tell you some more — my wife and I saw it again today: They have a hatred for God,” Saccone said. “It’s amazing. You see it when I’m talking to them. It’s disturbing to me.”

Someone should tell Saccone to shut that down.

DiscoGary wrote:

Remember when Republicans demanded independent councils for all of Obama's scandals? That's right. There were none, and Republicans did not call for any. They are part of the swamp.

This post exemplifies your crazy thought processes.

The GOP couldn't stand Obama. Period. End of discussion. If there had been an Obama scandal, they would have investigated. They controlled Congress for 6 of his 8 years. So were the Benghazi and email investigations of Clinton just for show?!

Jeff Wigand wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Yup. The House investigation found no evidence of collusion. Normally you would say that this is just Republicans find big their own guy innocent, but Republicans do t line Trump any more than Democrats, so this is a much bigger deal than most people think it is.

Why would you believe them now? You didn't believe them when the Republican-led House Oversight Committee found no link between the Obama White House and the IRS Targeting scandal.

Because he wants to believe them.

I'm fine with this investigation being ended...they weren't doing what they needed to do anyway, and Robert Mueller is, so let his investigation be the defining one.

Trump is in no less trouble today than he was before.

nontrumper wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Yup. The House investigation found no evidence of collusion. Normally you would say that this is just Republicans find big their own guy innocent, but Republicans do t line Trump any more than Democrats, so this is a much bigger deal than most people think it is.

Correction: House REPUBLICANS on the intelligence committee apparently found no evidence of collusion. And one Republican actually disagreed about their assessment, acknowledging that the Russians did interfere.

Isn't it odd that the House committee never interviewed Flynn, Papadopoulos, Manafort, or Gates? All have indictments. Three of the four are cooperating with Mueller.

It was a farce. Nunes will be dealing with his own indictment in due time.

Fortunately, Mueller and his team were still at work early this morning. Rule of law will prevail.

CORRECT! (I'm not 100% sure of the Nunes indictment to come, but I wouldn't bet against it)

Stable Genius wrote:

nontrumper wrote:

Correction: House REPUBLICANS on the intelligence committee apparently found no evidence of collusion. And one Republican actually disagreed about their assessment, acknowledging that the Russians did interfere.

Isn't it odd that the House committee never interviewed Flynn, Papadopoulos, Manafort, or Gates? All have indictments. Three of the four are cooperating with Mueller.

It was a farce. Nunes will be dealing with his own indictment in due time.

Fortunately, Mueller and his team were still at work early this morning. Rule of law will prevail.

This. The perimeter around DJT is closing by the day. Fewer allies, fewer defenders, and more evidence of something.

There is no point in arguing w/ people who twist themselves into increasingly convoluted positions to defend the indefensible.

For over a year we've been hearing

"There's evidence of SOMETHING"

"The pieces are coming together"

etc.

Yet, no one has even formulated a concrete idea of what "it" is. It's comical.

Deep State clown Mueller is just trophy hunting, trying to justify his job title.

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

You go to Fox news right now and the big headline story is some piece on Hillary.

They are really obsessed with her. I guess they planned on her being president and wanted to write bad things about her constantly and are having withdrawal.

Hillary keeps insulting Trump voters, which is why she lost, and why she's still in the news. She is not helping your cause. Someone should tell her to shut that down.

I agree with you there. She isn't doing the Democrats any favors, and she just looks like a bitter sore loser. She is not the future of the Democratic Party and should keep her yap shut.

jamin wrote:

Yet, no one has even formulated a concrete idea of what "it" is. It's comical.

There is ample public information about what "it" is, only those with blinders can't see it.

jamin [DFF] wrote:

HI DFF!!!! Welcome back, comrade!