That's not me, that's the dirty troll. Check the spelling.
Even I have become convinced that Paula is a cheat. I'm going to stop posting here, but the troll will probably keep up his nonsense.
That's not me, that's the dirty troll. Check the spelling.
Even I have become convinced that Paula is a cheat. I'm going to stop posting here, but the troll will probably keep up his nonsense.
Just leaving this quote from Ross Tucker here:
"Most of the women’s world records, even doped, lie outside the top 5000 times run by men. Radcliffe’s marathon WR, for instance, is beaten by between 250 and 300 men per year."
Is there a context to this quote?
It doesn't seem surprising to me that doped men are faster than doped women.
good news
The MRI test is taking place tomorrow
The million dollars covers the complete cost of the test
The context is in discussing how much faster men are than women--that the fastest women (even doped ones) are still eons behind countless sub-elite men every year.The significance is that Ross Tucker, when looking for a good example of doped woman's world record, casually chose Paula as an example. Translation: It's now common and accepted knowledge that Paula's record was obtained through doping.
cleans wrote:
Is there a context to this quote?
It doesn't seem surprising to me that doped men are faster than doped women.
So it's generally agreed that most, if not all, women's WRs were achieved by athletes doping yet Paula Radcliffe, running minutes faster than all other women including known dopers, is clean.
Why would you need a scientific study to draw a conclusion?
No infraction wrote:
So it's generally agreed that most, if not all, women's WRs were achieved by athletes doping yet Paula Radcliffe, running minutes faster than all other women including known dopers, is clean.
Why would you need a scientific study to draw a conclusion?
Because she's white and British. For black Africans we just accept rumours.
rekrunnner wrote:
The context is in discussing how much faster men are than women--that the fastest women (even doped ones) are still eons behind countless sub-elite men every year.
Indeed Rekrunner
The 5000 and marathon were held up as possible clean records in a sea of doped marks
It's now looking increasingly likely that there are no clean womens marks
just sayin wrote:
good news
The MRI test is taking place tomorrow
The million dollars covers the complete cost of the test
Has there been a date set?
It is very impressive that Paula is taking a lead with this new anti-doping technology
rekrunnner wrote:
The context is in discussing how much faster men are than women--that the fastest women (even doped ones) are still eons behind countless sub-elite men every year.
The significance is that Ross Tucker, when looking for a good example of doped woman's world record, casually chose Paula as an example.
Translation: It's now common and accepted knowledge that Paula's record was obtained through doping.
Ah, I get it now - missed what he was doing there.
I just note once again that "rekrunnner" is not "rekrunner".
trackcoach. wrote:
rekrunnner wrote:The context is in discussing how much faster men are than women--that the fastest women (even doped ones) are still eons behind countless sub-elite men every year.
Indeed Rekrunner
The 5000 and marathon were held up as possible clean records in a sea of doped marks
It's now looking increasingly likely that there are no clean womens marks
Yeah!! We don't need no stinking studies!!!!It seems so obvious that Paula should be put in the same camp as the state sponsored Chinese, Russian, and Eastern Block countries, or the American sprinters, because they have so much in common.Didn't "letsrun" conduct its own scientific survey? Not too long ago, some of the women's records, including Paula's, were generally agreed as achieved by athletes who were not dirty:http://www.letsrun.com/news/2014/02/world-record-results-doping/At the top of the list we can find athletes like Mary Keitany, Turinesh Dibaba, and Paula Radcliffe were generally agreed to be clean.Oh how times have changed.
No infraction wrote:
So it's generally agreed that most, if not all, women's WRs were achieved by athletes doping yet Paula Radcliffe, running minutes faster than all other women including known dopers, is clean.
Why would you need a scientific study to draw a conclusion?
Healing Hans... I told you about a hundred pages ago on this thread that this man was the one to focus on!
Shock horror - doctor promotes use of drug which is legal. Someone hold the front pages, this stuff is dynamite...
Sigh.
Unless / until WADA determines this stuff illegal, you can't criticise anyone for using it. It's there for everyone. Ditto Meldonium, pre Dec 2015.
It might not suit the purists, but the rules are the rules.
And you truly believe Healing Hans is only working with Actovegin???????
Come on!
Paula has a Stadium named after her. That means she never doped.
There was Tiger Woods doctor, Dr. Galea in Canada. Many doctors use a substance that WADA has known about since its existence, and has never banned it. Good find.WADA compares Actovegin to iron.
Autologous Madness wrote:
And you truly believe Healing Hans is only working with Actovegin???????
Come on!
Good find! I scrolled through the women's 10000 all time list. After Elvan A and the recent Djbaba news, I am starting to wonder what to believe anymore.Haven't heard much on Keitany.
Survey says ... X X X wrote:
Yeah!! We don't need no stinking studies!!!!
It seems so obvious that Paula should be put in the same camp as the state sponsored Chinese, Russian, and Eastern Block countries, or the American sprinters, because they have so much in common.
Didn't "letsrun" conduct its own scientific survey? Not too long ago, some of the women's records, including Paula's, were generally agreed as achieved by athletes who were not dirty:
http://www.letsrun.com/news/2014/02/world-record-results-doping/At the top of the list we can find athletes like Mary Keitany, Turinesh Dibaba, and Paula Radcliffe were generally agreed to be clean.
Oh how times have changed.
No infraction wrote:So it's generally agreed that most, if not all, women's WRs were achieved by athletes doping yet Paula Radcliffe, running minutes faster than all other women including known dopers, is clean.
Why would you need a scientific study to draw a conclusion?
Maybe she's a Semanya. Just wait for Caster to run the 800 equivalent of 2:15
Cleaner than You wrote:
Paula has a Stadium named after her. That means she never doped.
Arnold Schwazenegger also had a stadium named after him. Only when Paula starts dishing out death penalties to those who accuse her of doping will she lose her name from her stadium.