The moron says completely incapable of comprehending he's on a thread glorifying the "visceral" hatred of the scary orange man.
Liberals are completely incapable of self awareness.
Limited government and fiscal responsibility are completely practical in any society.
The thread is about how Trump allegedly broke the law. I don't hate the man, I don't even know him. He's a jackass, but so are all politicians, so I'm not losing sleep over him. The fact you (and others) brought Hillary into the discussion and she features in nearly every one of your replies shows that this 74 year old grandmother dominates your thoughts. Take some time and ask yourself why you hate this person whom you've never met so much.
If you ask them, most people (even liberals you are scared of!) are in favor of limited government interference and fiscal responsibility. But libertarianism (like most other -isms) cannot exist outside of a perfect political vacuum. You love it because you get to know, deep down, that you are right and everyone else is wrong, but you are never in danger of having your beliefs challenged in real life.
Jesus Christ...
If your neighbor's son murdered someone on the front lawn and no one cared and then your own son murdered someone on your own lawn and he got arrested immediately. Do you think you might mention the treatment your neighbor's kid got?
Are you people actually this stupid or just this dishonest?
Liberals are NOT in favor of limited government. That is an idiotic claim to make and flies in the face of all of human history.
but anyway, the fact you won't answer the basic question shows your lack of spine and character.
The Trump case hasn't even played out yet.
Hillary clearly committed multiple felonies and lied about it and you voted for her anyway.
Again, what do the crimes and shortcomings of others have to do with Trump breaking the law?
Hillary is a b!tch. I do not like her and did not vote for her. My vote when to Gary Johnson because as much as I disliked Hillary, I knew Trump was a fraud and a joke of a candidate. I didn't have a feeling one way or another about Biden. But he was "anything but Trump" so he got my vote. If either or both have been found committing crimes, they should face consequences. I wouldn't argue. I wouldn't defend. I wouldn't go "but, but, but Trump, but, but, but Bush."
You need to grow up. The irony of your handle isn't lost on anyone. If you would concede that Trump is in trouble because of things he did, then people would start listening to some of the stuff you have to say. You can be better.
Hillary clearly committed multiple felonies and lied about it and you voted for her anyway.
Again, what do the crimes and shortcomings of others have to do with Trump breaking the law?
Hillary is a b!tch. I do not like her and did not vote for her. My vote when to Gary Johnson because as much as I disliked Hillary, I knew Trump was a fraud and a joke of a candidate. I didn't have a feeling one way or another about Biden. But he was "anything but Trump" so he got my vote. If either or both have been found committing crimes, they should face consequences. I wouldn't argue. I wouldn't defend. I wouldn't go "but, but, but Trump, but, but, but Bush."
You need to grow up. The irony of your handle isn't lost on anyone. If you would concede that Trump is in trouble because of things he did, then people would start listening to some of the stuff you have to say. You can be better.
You are literally too stupid to have a discussion with.
Equal application of the law. Equal application of the law. Equal application of the law. Equal application of the law. Equal application of the law.
I've said repeatedly lock Trump up IF you apply the same standards to Hillary Clinton.
You won't do it because you don't actually give a damn about the law you just hate Trump and want to root for your team.
The thread is about how Trump allegedly broke the law. I don't hate the man, I don't even know him. He's a jackass, but so are all politicians, so I'm not losing sleep over him. The fact you (and others) brought Hillary into the discussion and she features in nearly every one of your replies shows that this 74 year old grandmother dominates your thoughts. Take some time and ask yourself why you hate this person whom you've never met so much.
If you ask them, most people (even liberals you are scared of!) are in favor of limited government interference and fiscal responsibility. But libertarianism (like most other -isms) cannot exist outside of a perfect political vacuum. You love it because you get to know, deep down, that you are right and everyone else is wrong, but you are never in danger of having your beliefs challenged in real life.
Jesus Christ...
If your neighbor's son murdered someone on the front lawn and no one cared and then your own son murdered someone on your own lawn and he got arrested immediately. Do you think you might mention the treatment your neighbor's kid got?
Are you people actually this stupid or just this dishonest?
Liberals are NOT in favor of limited government. That is an idiotic claim to make and flies in the face of all of human history.
I'll answer your questions after you show me on the doll where Hillary touched you. It's okay to let it out, Letsrun is a safe space.
If your neighbor's son murdered someone on the front lawn and no one cared and then your own son murdered someone on your own lawn and he got arrested immediately. Do you think you might mention the treatment your neighbor's kid got?
Are you people actually this stupid or just this dishonest?
Liberals are NOT in favor of limited government. That is an idiotic claim to make and flies in the face of all of human history.
Funny stuff.
Mr 'I definitely don't like Trump' is using an analogy where Trump is his son.
Not really a great analogy though. You can complain all you want about the neighbor's son 'getting away with it', it's not going to lessen the punishment Trump, oops I mean your son gets.
New Zealand didn't practice slavery. You simply identified the actions of a group of individuals who acted criminally; it was never a state policy - unlike the institution of slavery in the US, which occurred over centuries and maintained an economy and social framework. But you like to show your ignorance; it's all you've got.
lol...
"Centuries"
Slavery wasn't legal in the United States for even 100 years let alone "centuries".
You are WAAAY too stupid to be calling anyone ignorant you silly little sheep raper.
Jesus, read a book man. I like how you throw the "legal in the United States" as if it being "not legal" meant it didn't exist. The answer is roughly 250 years. That's at least 2 centuries, thus century being pluralized.
If your neighbor's son murdered someone on the front lawn and no one cared and then your own son murdered someone on your own lawn and he got arrested immediately. Do you think you might mention the treatment your neighbor's kid got?
Are you people actually this stupid or just this dishonest?
Liberals are NOT in favor of limited government. That is an idiotic claim to make and flies in the face of all of human history.
I'll answer your questions after you show me on the doll where Hillary touched you. It's okay to let it out, Letsrun is a safe space.
You can't answer the questions because you're either too stupid or too dishonest.
Meanwhile, Trump has been out of office and without power and you claim that he is harming America more than Biden? The man holds no power right now. Get over him.
Yup, he has been out of office with no power, yet somehow he has in his possession documents only those in power should have. No wait they were planted. No wait they were declassified. No wait they were his.
Obama had classified documents at his place outside of Chicago for two years before they were moved to an NARA facility in DC in 2018 (not to mention the 10,000 documents that he destroyed from the archives in office). Trump's having documents is not unheard of for former presidents. The only difference between Obama and Trump was the sign off from the archivist (the same archivist that noted the 10,000 missing documents from Obama's tenure). All they told Trump to do after they visited Mar-a-Lago the first time was to put an extra lock on the door. Over the past year and a half the only one signing bills and executive orders has been Biden. And he has done far more harm in the past year and a half than Trump.
These threads show that debate is an impossibility once the subject of Trump is raised. His supporters have completely departed from reality and are driven only by the delusions, falsehoods and prejudices that comprise the unfortunate mistake that is their personality. There are only a few of them here but they compensate for their numbers with the sheer stridency of their views. They don't "live" in the US in the way we would think most Americans do - they inhabit an appalling landscape of their own invention, that exists only in their fevered imagination.
The simplest solution would be to give them an island away from everyone else, where they might bay at the moon to their hearts content, but there is no retreat available that could take 40 million basket cases and they insist that they have the right to rule the other 300 or so million Americans. Jonathan Swift would have recognized them, when he wrote in "Gulliver's Travels" how Gulliver encountered a land of tiny midgets who sought to somehow make him their prisoner. He could have been inspired by the thought of a sane person who happened to find themselves in a Trump rally. But we have a Trump rally here, attended by its intellectual equivalent of the Lilliputian midgets. They are as sane as a bunch of lemmings heading for the first available cliff, thinking they are on the road to their salvation. If it wasn't for the fact they want to take us with them, we should simply leave them to it.
If your neighbor's son murdered someone on the front lawn and no one cared and then your own son murdered someone on your own lawn and he got arrested immediately. Do you think you might mention the treatment your neighbor's kid got?
Are you people actually this stupid or just this dishonest?
Liberals are NOT in favor of limited government. That is an idiotic claim to make and flies in the face of all of human history.
It's no wonder you are who you are. Your folks are willing to look the other way on a crime you committed because your neighbor committed the same crime and didn't go to jail? At no point if one of my kids did something illegal would I then get angry because somebody else got away with it. I would be angry at my kid for doing something illegal. But then again, I'm raising my kids to obey the rules of law and operate with a set of morals and ethics.
Slavery wasn't legal in the United States for even 100 years let alone "centuries".
You are WAAAY too stupid to be calling anyone ignorant you silly little sheep raper.
Jesus, read a book man. I like how you throw the "legal in the United States" as if it being "not legal" meant it didn't exist. The answer is roughly 250 years. That's at least 2 centuries, thus century being pluralized.
The United States isn't on the hook for something the British Empire did you little fool.
Why is it always the stupid people who tell other people to read a book? If you've ever read anything it's obvious you didn't understand it.
If your neighbor's son murdered someone on the front lawn and no one cared and then your own son murdered someone on your own lawn and he got arrested immediately. Do you think you might mention the treatment your neighbor's kid got?
Are you people actually this stupid or just this dishonest?
Liberals are NOT in favor of limited government. That is an idiotic claim to make and flies in the face of all of human history.
It's no wonder you are who you are. Your folks are willing to look the other way on a crime you committed because your neighbor committed the same crime and didn't go to jail? At no point if one of my kids did something illegal would I then get angry because somebody else got away with it. I would be angry at my kid for doing something illegal. But then again, I'm raising my kids to obey the rules of law and operate with a set of morals and ethics.
Way to be too stupid to understand the simplest analogy.
If the only criminal who went to jail for breaking the law was your kid you would be singing a different toon.
Of course, you're too stupid or too dishonest to admit it.
Yup, he has been out of office with no power, yet somehow he has in his possession documents only those in power should have. No wait they were planted. No wait they were declassified. No wait they were his.
Obama had classified documents at his place outside of Chicago for two years before they were moved to an NARA facility in DC in 2018 (not to mention the 10,000 documents that he destroyed from the archives in office). Trump's having documents is not unheard of for former presidents. The only difference between Obama and Trump was the sign off from the archivist (the same archivist that noted the 10,000 missing documents from Obama's tenure). All they told Trump to do after they visited Mar-a-Lago the first time was to put an extra lock on the door. Over the past year and a half the only one signing bills and executive orders has been Biden. And he has done far more harm in the past year and a half than Trump.
The National Archives and Records Administration pushed back on former President Donald Trump’s assertions that his predecessor, Barack Obama, had taken classified documents from the White House as he faces intense scrutiny o...
But you already know this. You're being intellectually dishonest. BTW, there are massive differences between Obama and Trump. Obama would still be in office if it wasn't for term limits and if he could run again he would wipe the floor with Trump. He's what a president actual looks like.
The buck stopped with Trump and it’s reasonable for Weisselberg not to take 100% of the blame. Unless it involved the Mafia, anyone else would do the same thing. No one is going to do 10 years for Trump.
Weisselberg is going to Rikers, for Christ's sakes. Have you ever been to Rikers? It's like the Angola of jails. They serve slop on a shingle, with a weak gruel for lunch.
The Trump compound is increasingly dysfunctional due to the rat problem. One simply cannot conduct the affairs of the enterprise when one has rats running around busting chops to the feds. It's heightened tension down there. Everyone suspects everyone, everyone eyeballing each other, making lists, wiping hard drives, consulting lawyers. Everyone huddled over their own bowl of rice, afraid to ask anyone to pass the salt for fear of repercussions.
So we see you have two obsessions: rodents and NZ. They don't appear to be connected - or have anything to do with the thread. About the only thing they might share is they can be located in the commode that is your brain. It really is time to flush it - like your user name suggests.
I think you resorted to calling me stupid in every single one of your responses to me. Rather than actually try to express your opinion in a manner that would make me consider or think about it, you go right for the first grade insult. Why is that? Besides the fact that I am stupid to you. Why go for the insults? Is it because others have called you stupid, so you feel it's ok to do that to others?
I'll answer your questions after you show me on the doll where Hillary touched you. It's okay to let it out, Letsrun is a safe space.
You can't answer the questions because you're either too stupid or too dishonest.
If I say you're right about everything and bow to your superior intellect, will you take a step back and realize that you're frothing at the mouth on a running forum about someone who hasn't held elected office since 2009, doesn't know you exist, and has lived a rich, full life with many accomplishments? And maybe realize your obsession and bloviating aren't healthy?
These threads show that debate is an impossibility once the subject of Trump is raised. His supporters have completely departed from reality and are driven only by the delusions, falsehoods and prejudices that comprise the unfortunate mistake that is their personality. There are only a few of them here but they compensate for their numbers with the sheer stridency of their views. They don't "live" in the US in the way we would think most Americans do - they inhabit an appalling landscape of their own invention, that exists only in their fevered imagination.
The simplest solution would be to give them an island away from everyone else, where they might bay at the moon to their hearts content, but there is no retreat available that could take 40 million basket cases and they insist that they have the right to rule the other 300 or so million Americans. Jonathan Swift would have recognized them, when he wrote in "Gulliver's Travels" how Gulliver encountered a land of tiny midgets who sought to somehow make him their prisoner. He could have been inspired by the thought of a sane person who happened to find themselves in a Trump rally. But we have a Trump rally here, attended by its intellectual equivalent of the Lilliputian midgets. They are as sane as a bunch of lemmings heading for the first available cliff, thinking they are on the road to their salvation. If it wasn't for the fact they want to take us with them, we should simply leave them to it.
There's must be something toxic inside of sheep orifices... there's no other explanation for how stupid you are.
You can't answer the questions because you're either too stupid or too dishonest.
If I say you're right about everything and bow to your superior intellect, will you take a step back and realize that you're frothing at the mouth on a running forum about someone who hasn't held elected office since 2009, doesn't know you exist, and has lived a rich, full life with many accomplishments? And maybe realize your obsession and bloviating aren't healthy?
I don't need you to admit anything. Your own words are all the evidence anyone needs to understand your limitations.
The fact that you can't comprehend why HRC is relevant to a discussion on the legality of possessing classified documents is just more evidence of your stupidity.
And the woman hasn't lived a rich full life. She's married to a serial cheater who literally raped a woman and she stuck with him because she cares more about her own political career than anything. She lost the presidency to the person she hates most in the world. lol. If you think she's going to die satisfied you're delusional.
