Just got on this thread for the first time. I had to see what idiots were saying more than a full year after the inauguration. Truly amazing on a running website. I should have know that the main a$$clown of all, flagpole, would be leading the charge.
Do svidaniya
Line 3 wrote:
PIO! wrote:
Wow, you are sounding a dumb as a Trumpette. Sorry, but you really do.
YOU are the one ignoring what was in the article. The article is about what is going on in Kentucky. Seriously, did you even read it?
Quote from line 3 of the article: "Kentucky has the third-highest rate of child marriage in the country, just below Texas and Florida."
Quote from the article:
"Mary Kunze, a spokeswoman for the Family Foundation of Kentucky, told HuffPost that the group supports the bill overall, but wanted changes to the provision allowing a 17-year-old to get married with a judge’s consent. Kunze said they wanted it to make clear that a parent must also agree to the marriage."
Quote from me: "Are you REALLY that stupid?"
You are a clown wrote:
Just got on this thread for the first time. I had to see what idiots were saying more than a full year after the inauguration. Truly amazing on a running website. I should have know that the main a$$clown of all, flagpole, would be leading the charge.
Do svidaniya
Lot's of insightful content ^ !
LOL
You are a clown wrote:
Just got on this thread for the first time. I had to see what idiots were saying more than a full year after the inauguration. Truly amazing on a running website. I should have know that the main a$$clown of all, flagpole, would be leading the charge.
Do svidaniya
So, the only question is which butt-hurt poster are you? And how badly did Flagpole humiliate you?
Score:
Flagpole 421
You are a clown & Associates: 0
Well.....this wrote:
truthseakr wrote:
When no collusion is found are all the LR liberals gonna hold hands and jump off the golden gate bridge?..lol...
This is just so sad and pitiful. Your heart wasn't in that post, you are just going through the motions of putting up a weak feeble defense.
Trump's entire presidency is in total disarray. People are fleeing him faster than rats jumping off the Titanic. Even if collusion isn't found there is so much legal trouble trump and his people are in from money laundering, lying and malfeasance. His ethical and legal troubles are huge.
He is in melt down.
The only ones who are going to jump off the golden gate are all those fools who believed in him.
And if you follow politics you know that the Democrats are in the middle of a 'civil war'.
truthseakr wrote:
Well.....this wrote:
This is just so sad and pitiful. Your heart wasn't in that post, you are just going through the motions of putting up a weak feeble defense.
Trump's entire presidency is in total disarray. People are fleeing him faster than rats jumping off the Titanic. Even if collusion isn't found there is so much legal trouble trump and his people are in from money laundering, lying and malfeasance. His ethical and legal troubles are huge.
He is in melt down.
The only ones who are going to jump off the golden gate are all those fools who believed in him.
And if you follow politics you know that the Democrats are in the middle of a 'civil war'.
Come on, Lying Gary! You can do so much better! I know you've been trounced, pummeled, and ground into the dirt 'til your individual atoms are no longer distinguishable from earthworm sh!t but that is no reason to quit on us now. What kind of an "American" are you anyway? Real Americans don't quit.
Come ON, Lying Gary!
.
.
.
.
.
Lying Gary.
You are a clown wrote:
Just got on this thread for the first time. I had to see what idiots were saying more than a full year after the inauguration. Truly amazing on a running website. I should have know that the main a$$clown of all, flagpole, would be leading the charge.
Do svidaniya
^EPIC HARDLOPER!!!
Let’s party like it’s 2002-2006 again! wrote:
Reasonable Republican wrote:
...... I do oppose him on things that I don't like (Like the tariffs, his divisiveness and some of his stupid tweets) at the same time he's also done some things that I like (Tax cuts, reducing regulations). I wouldn't necessarily say I support him but I will celebrate when he does good things and criticize him when he does bad its called holding him accountable.
How old are you “reasonable republican”? Are you old enough to remember the Bush II years and the policies implemented—especially the tax policy—the last time the GOP controlled all branches of government? If you are old enough, why would support the same exact policies that gave us the financial collapse of 2007?
How dumb are people? Why do they forget so quickly? The modern GOP is NOT fiscally conservative. They have cut taxes before—several times in most of our lifetimes—and they NEVER get to cutting spending.
I suppose a tax cut would be fine IF they passed a legislation slashing government spending FIRST. In other words, cut spending by X amount so they know how much less revenue they’l be taking in and then give X amount back to tax payers. But that’s not what happens. We’ve seen this playbook before—recently.
The GOP controlled both houses of Congress AND the had a GOP POTUS for 6 of the 8 Bush II years—this was not that long ago, the early 2000s. They passed a massive tax cut. What else did they do? Well they 1) said the tax cuts would “pay for themselves” by driving economic growth 2) they then MASSIVELY INCREASED government spending!
What happened? We had a short term boom followed by a MASSIVE economic collapse AND a MASSIVE increase in the national debt. But since the economic collapse happened several years later dumb people with short attention spans that are obsessed with tax cuts who think that the minute tax legislation is passed the full effect of said tax legislation is felt—are mentally unable to connect the collapse to very bad tax & spend policies of the GOP.
So, what is happening now? 1) the GOP is saying the same thing about “tax cuts paying for themselves” by driving economic growth (sound familiar?) 2) CEOs are smart and know if they throw peons short term benefits (peanuts) that they can connect that to the tax cuts and say “see trickle down works! What’s good for corporations is good for individuals”...meanwhile they pocket > 90% of the benefit from the cut 3) the GOP proposes MASSIVE increases in defense spending, infrastructure spending, and spending for a border wall with no plan to pay for any of it.
These tax cuts will have the same effect as prior cuts—a huge increase in the national debt and an eventual economic collapse that disproportionately effects individuals (who, yeah, got a short term increase in $) while corporations make out like bandits (their cuts are permanent). Plus, all the benefits (short term) will be attributed to the current admin, while the long term effects will be blamed on whomever is in office when the $hit hits the fan in several years.
Why do you tax obsess Morans not understand that at this point the ONLY rational approach given the debt handed to us by the Boomers is an INCREASE in taxes coupled with a DECREASE in spending (which at this point involves cutting defense spending and entitlement spendinf). We owe too much already to get tax cuts, they are a bad idea.
Score Keeper wrote:
You are a clown wrote:
Just got on this thread for the first time. I had to see what idiots were saying more than a full year after the inauguration. Truly amazing on a running website. I should have know that the main a$$clown of all, flagpole, would be leading the charge.
Do svidaniya
So, the only question is which butt-hurt poster are you? And how badly did Flagpole humiliate you?
Score:
Flagpole 421
You are a clown & Associates: 0
This is a correct score.
Flagpole wrote:
Score Keeper wrote:
So, the only question is which butt-hurt poster are you? And how badly did Flagpole humiliate you?
Score:
Flagpole 42173847
You are a clown & Associates: 0
This is a correct score.
Corrected score above, brother.
I’ve got a different score card! wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
This is a correct score.
Corrected score above, brother.
Ah...you included the score from the German judge. I wasn't counting her. I accept your revised score.
Score Keeper wrote:
You are a clown wrote:
Just got on this thread for the first time. I had to see what idiots were saying more than a full year after the inauguration. Truly amazing on a running website. I should have know that the main a$$clown of all, flagpole, would be leading the charge.
Do svidaniya
So, the only question is which butt-hurt poster are you? And how badly did Flagpole humiliate you?
Score:
Flagpole 421
You are a clown & Associates: 0
"You are..." certainly posts like someone who was badly humiliated and wounded by flagpole.
And no one believes he hasn't been on this thread in over a year and that his very first post is about flagpole.
You are you really?
It must be asked at this point: when/whether this thread will overcome the several years' head start on the "Down goes the Dow" thread, and actually accumulate more posts.
With its solid current lead, I'm thinking that the Dow thread will get to 30,000 first--lots of up & down in the market ahead, and hence lots of posts commenting on that.
But I'm going to be interested to see which thread hits 40,000 posts first.
PIO! wrote:
Quote from me: "Are you REALLY that stupid?"
PIO - man you are still doing the the attack posts?
Your posts are very good without that nonsense.
Conundrum wrote:
PIO! wrote:
Quote from me: "Are you REALLY that stupid?"
PIO - man you are still doing the the attack posts?
Your posts are very good without that nonsense.
Thanks dude.
I'll make you a deal - how about you refrain from attacking me and I will refrain from attacking anybody?
Don't know what I'm talking about? Go back to our previous exchange and notice that YOU ATTACKED ME FIRST. That is the ONLY reason I was nasty toward you. You thought I was a Trumpette, seemingly felt that that made it OK to attack me and that's how the whole thing got started.
Don't believe me? Go back and check.
Time for some reality...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
PIO! wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
PIO - man you are still doing the the attack posts?
Your posts are very good without that nonsense.
Thanks dude.
I'll make you a deal - how about you refrain from attacking me and I will refrain from attacking anybody?
Don't know what I'm talking about? Go back to our previous exchange and notice that YOU ATTACKED ME FIRST. That is the ONLY reason I was nasty toward you. You thought I was a Trumpette, seemingly felt that that made it OK to attack me and that's how the whole thing got started.
Don't believe me? Go back and check.
Maybe if you had fewer capitals and exclamation points in your handle people wouldn’t mistake you for a member of the alt right.
This is not only not true. It is ridiculously stupid and clueless.
I know people hate to do any research because they might actually learn something but you may want to try it sometime!
runner1000000 wrote:
This is not only not true. It is ridiculously stupid and clueless.
I know people hate to do any research because they might actually learn something but you may want to try it sometime!
When the post you're replying to is however-many pages back, it might be useful to quote it--just so people know what you're responding to.
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?