Tyler was a left winger. 100%
At this point, there is no amount of further evidence that will sway the liars.
-
1324
-
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
Easy enough wrote:
And I believe some of the worst ideas tend to come from people who adopt all-or-nothing attitudes about their “team” and the “other team.”
Lots of people are willing to excuse plenty of terrible things from their own side and will circle the wagons around them just as long as they can keep sticking it to the other guys.
Except my side doesn't consider words "violence," won't gleefully cheer when a political rival is killed, and will denounce any initiation of force violence, even if it may come from our own side.
Trump said he loved the violent domestic terrorists that assaulted The Capitol (and police). That’s not denouncing.
77 -
nwrun09 wrote:
No one post the president's kids, multiple Republican politicians, and Charlie Kirk's own reaction to Paul Pelosi being violently assaulted. It might cause this poster to lose their grip on reality.
It's funny that many on the right say that "words matter" when someone celebrates the murder of a guy they like-- Charlie Kirk-- but then opine that Kirk's OWN often hateful and violence-affirming words were just a matter of "free speech and civil debate". Likewise with Trump's own inflammatory and provocative language ("he just says things").
I don't agree with anyone vocally supporting or celebrating the murder of anyone, but if you're a supporter of free speech, you need to be consistent. In fact, it's the ONLY requirement of a free speech supporter!
116 -
Big if true… but it would not be surprising. At all.
86 -
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
Tyler was a left winger. 100%
At this point, there is no amount of further evidence that will sway the liars.
They know this. But their masters have taught to “deny, deny, deny!” You know, people like the decrepit sexually suspect Saul Alinsky. Honesty is not their make up. Everything is deception and sneakiness.
116 -
The Reality of Hypocrtical Bolsheviks wrote:
Big if true… but it would not be surprising. At all.
I don't trust MSM.
17 -
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
Easy enough wrote:
And I believe some of the worst ideas tend to come from people who adopt all-or-nothing attitudes about their “team” and the “other team.”
Lots of people are willing to excuse plenty of terrible things from their own side and will circle the wagons around them just as long as they can keep sticking it to the other guys.
Except my side doesn't consider words "violence," won't gleefully cheer when a political rival is killed, and will denounce any initiation of force violence, even if it may come from our own side.
But haven't you been celebrating people losing their jobs over "words"? And aren't you threatening your political enemies for their words?
Celebrating the death or Charlie Kirk, even in the grossest possible way, is still just words, right? Even demonizing ones political enemies, or simply groups one does not like-- as Charlie Kirk himself made a business of doing and as you are doing right now!-- is just words.
For actual deeds, the country has a legal system.
38 -
Conway
“Odds are the kid's motivations and political views are jumbled and deranged, a psychologically disordered mishmash of quarter-baked ideas, and that we may never understand them fully. I wouldn't discount the interesting possibility he's a Groyper, or anything else as wacky, at this point. But though we can't be certain, what's seemingly the biggest tell that he probably isn't a radical lefty is the orange dog that isn't barking. For if investigators had substantial credible evidence that this rifle-toting child of ruby-red southern Utah isn't some kind of Antifa revolutionary (but again, who knows), the Trump administration would be ballyhooing that evidence nonstop. Which hasn't happened. We shall ultimately see, or not.”
15 -
SB wrote:
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
Except my side doesn't consider words "violence," won't gleefully cheer when a political rival is killed, and will denounce any initiation of force violence, even if it may come from our own side.
But haven't you been celebrating people losing their jobs over "words"? And aren't you threatening your political enemies for their words?
Celebrating the death or Charlie Kirk, even in the grossest possible way, is still just words, right? Even demonizing ones political enemies, or simply groups one does not like-- as Charlie Kirk himself made a business of doing and as you are doing right now!-- is just words.
For actual deeds, the country has a legal system.
It seems the right wants to Canonize Kirk. Which they are free to do.
But they want to force non Trumpers to do the same.
Ain’t happening.
The guy made millions making videos debating naive college kids and avoiding experts and authorities on topics.
56 -
SB wrote:
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
Except my side doesn't consider words "violence," won't gleefully cheer when a political rival is killed, and will denounce any initiation of force violence, even if it may come from our own side.
But haven't you been celebrating people losing their jobs over "words"? And aren't you threatening your political enemies for their words?
Celebrating the death or Charlie Kirk, even in the grossest possible way, is still just words, right? Even demonizing ones political enemies, or simply groups one does not like-- as Charlie Kirk himself made a business of doing and as you are doing right now!-- is just words.
For actual deeds, the country has a legal system.
“Freedom of speech isn’t freedom from consequences”
”private companies can do what they want”
I distinctly remember hearing these 2 quotes about Trump’s ban from Twitter in 2021.
54 -
Tommy Tuberville wrote:
SB wrote:
But haven't you been celebrating people losing their jobs over "words"? And aren't you threatening your political enemies for their words?
Celebrating the death or Charlie Kirk, even in the grossest possible way, is still just words, right? Even demonizing ones political enemies, or simply groups one does not like-- as Charlie Kirk himself made a business of doing and as you are doing right now!-- is just words.
For actual deeds, the country has a legal system.
It seems the right wants to Canonize Kirk. Which they are free to do.
But they want to force non Trumpers to do the same.
Ain’t happening.
The guy made millions making videos debating naive college kids and avoiding experts and authorities on topics.
Horst Wessel.
12 -
Jussie. wrote:
SB wrote:
But haven't you been celebrating people losing their jobs over "words"? And aren't you threatening your political enemies for their words?
Celebrating the death or Charlie Kirk, even in the grossest possible way, is still just words, right? Even demonizing ones political enemies, or simply groups one does not like-- as Charlie Kirk himself made a business of doing and as you are doing right now!-- is just words.
For actual deeds, the country has a legal system.
“Freedom of speech isn’t freedom from consequences”
”private companies can do what they want”
I distinctly remember hearing these 2 quotes about Trump’s ban from Twitter in 2021.
What the libs are getting wrong here is that they’re making a behavioral issue into a free speech one.
Most large employers have a code on conduct and can fire you for what they deem unprofessional behavior.
Once they do that you’re free to go home and talk sh!t about Kirk all you want.
52 -
Badcompany wrote:
Jussie. wrote:
“Freedom of speech isn’t freedom from consequences”
”private companies can do what they want”
I distinctly remember hearing these 2 quotes about Trump’s ban from Twitter in 2021.
What the libs are getting wrong here is that they’re making a behavioral issue into a free speech one.
Most large employers have a code on conduct and can fire you for what they deem unprofessional behavior.
Once they do that you’re free to go home and talk sh!t about Kirk all you want.
True. Just like Tyler Robinson was free to live with his trans buddy. Which he did. Which figures.
42 -
The Reality of Hypocrtical Bolsheviks wrote:
Big if true… but it would not be surprising. At all.
That's your roommate, we already know 😜
13 -
This isn't complicated. Words aren't violence unless you threaten someone. Free speech is a right from God that the Governemnt can't take away. But your employer is free to fire you for actions that contradict their principles. These are the foundations of our country.
21 -
Je suis Charlie
22 -
Adult hijacked another thread wrote:
The Reality of Hypocrtical Bolsheviks wrote:
Big if true… but it would not be surprising. At all.
That's your roommate, we already know 😜
According to BBC, USA Today and his parents. Tyler Robinson lived at home with his parents.
45 -
SB wrote:
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
Except my side doesn't consider words "violence," won't gleefully cheer when a political rival is killed, and will denounce any initiation of force violence, even if it may come from our own side.
But haven't you been celebrating people losing their jobs over "words"? And aren't you threatening your political enemies for their words?
Celebrating the death or Charlie Kirk, even in the grossest possible way, is still just words, right? Even demonizing ones political enemies, or simply groups one does not like-- as Charlie Kirk himself made a business of doing and as you are doing right now!-- is just words.
For actual deeds, the country has a legal system.
Are you equating losing your life to losing your job?
13 -
Tommy Tuberville wrote:
Adult hijacked another thread wrote:
That's your roommate, we already know 😜
According to BBC, USA Today and his parents. Tyler Robinson lived at home with his parents.
The trumpies have been told by their thought bosses that gay and transgender people are to be the scapegoat for all that is wrong, so they are going with that. They falsely accused trans people by name her on these pages even.
scary sh”t.
16 -
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
Tyler was a left winger. 100%
At this point, there is no amount of further evidence that will sway the liars.
This ^
50
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.