climate science
climate science
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
A very stable genius! wrote:
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
I am afraid I am going to have another meltdown. I have been promising that Mueller is coming and Trump is finished but after almost a year it seems that maybe Mueller is not coming and Trump is not done. It looks like I will be proved an idio. once again.
Hey Man wrote:
truthseakr wrote:
Mexico has been taking advantage of us for 100 years....All take and no give....
I've lived on the border for 37 years.
Hey look, it's Lying Gary!
Lying Gary, there's no need to be hiding behind your little friend here. You could have posted that cute little vacuous sound bite all by yourself. Come on out and play, Lying Gary.
I think the poster truthseakr is not DiscoGary but rather the new alias of our old friend exthrower. The blatant racism and excessive use of ellipses is a dead giveaway.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) Old news and from a biased poll. Latest polling today shows him at LOWEST point of 35%.
He's still got his base, and that's not going away. It's been a long time since the racists had any oxygen. Ronald Reagan was the last racist in office.
Indicators suggest Trump is losing the swing voter. Which was obvious from day 1, because this guy hates "poor people."
But, that doesn't mean November is going to play well for the Democrats.
Yeah. I don't disagree with any of that. His approval issue is more of a problem for him when it comes to impeachment time. The lower it is, the less chance Republicans will vote on his side. I agree with Allan Lilchtman though that Mueller will provide information on Trump that "shocks" the world, and when that is done, both Democrats and Republicans will have no choice but to oust him...though he might just resign.
I will say though that I will not be shocked. There is almost nothing that could come of Mueller's investigation on Trump that would shock me, including that he has had people killed (though I don't THINK he's done that or expect that; it just wouldn't shock me, because I believe Trump is amoral).
Flagpοle wrote:
A very stable genius! wrote:
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
I am afraid I am going to have another meltdown. I have been promising that Mueller is coming and Trump is finished but after almost a year it seems that maybe Mueller is not coming and Trump is not done. It looks like I will be proved an idio. once again.
Oh, Mueller came already, and it was less than impressive.
By the way, check out Mueller in action. As you watch his incompetence, keep in mind that this was 5 years ago. Imagine how much his mental acumen has degraded since then.
https://youtu.be/yAN8P0dbzmcThought of the Day: We have now reached a point where liberals praise the Deep State as the pillars of honesty and integrity, think whistle blowers should be executed, foreign media banned, and the Cold War revived.
All because they couldn't even beat Donald Trump after rigging their own primaries and hiring rogue FBI leadership to stop him.
I'm starting to wonder if the godless Trump is really the ultimate target of Mueller's investigation.
Mueller led the FBI for 10 years. He understands global power. I think it's entirely possible that his real target is someone who is far more powerful than our president. Mueller may be trying to figure out a way to bring down the puppet master.
kyts wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Yes, Anselm. Forgive me.
You believe in God. We get it. Just say "I believe...what I believe." 'Nuff said, and indisputable!
It's when you try to present that belief as the product of, or as bolstered by, logic--rather than as a plain matter of faith--that problems arise. Anselm's argument has been debunked many times. This is one of the clearer discussions I've seen:
http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2009/08/ontological-argument-for-god-rebuttal.htmlBut what does any of this have to do with the Donald Trump presidency? Let's keep our eyes on the ball here!
There is not one single even remotely valid argument FOR the existence of God.
There is not one single even remotely valid argument AGAINST the existence of God.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is either not that bright or hasn't thought about it very carefully.
If someone believes because, "Hey, I believe", that's fine.
If someone does NOT believe because, "Hey, I don't believe", that's fine.
Everything else on this topic is nonsense.
Fat hurts wrote:
foo wrote:
My opinion is if you can reconcile evolution, science and God, more power to you. Fat Hurts seems to have done it. Good for him.
I never saw anything that needed to be reconciled.
Evolution denial has been a cottage industry for decades. Hucksters would travel from church to church preying on the poorly educated. They would be given time on Sunday morning or Wednesday night to tell the congregation that scientists are out there trying to disprove the Bible. These folks never liked the smart kids in school, so it was an easy sell.
Eventually, evolution denial morphed into distrust of science in general. So when the Koch brothers wanted to undermine client science, that was pretty easy too.
Now, you have to believe in a global scientific conspiracy to be a Republican.
Do you believe that your father has a soul just like you that continues on after bodily death? And that your father is equally important in the eyes of God as you are?
PIO! wrote:
There is not one single even remotely valid argument FOR the existence of God.
There is not one single even remotely valid argument AGAINST the existence of God.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is either not that bright or hasn't thought about it very carefully.
Right. So St. Anslem was stupid. And anyone who thinks or thought that his argument was remotely valid is just not that bright.
Through history, a lot of truly brilliant people have accepted Anslem's proof or another similar proof. These are people like Rene Descartes who are way smarter than anyone on this board.
Obvi wrote:
Do you believe that your father has a soul just like you that continues on after bodily death? And that your father is equally important in the eyes of God as you are?
Yes I do. Continue with what you think is some kind of intellectual trap. This should be good.
Fat hurts wrote:
...
Eventually, evolution denial morphed into distrust of science in general.
...
That is not true.
DiscoGary wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
...
Eventually, evolution denial morphed into distrust of science in general.
...
That is not true.
It's certainly true among a lot of evangelicals. I've observed it first hand.
Fat hurts wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
That is not true.
It's certainly true among a lot of evangelicals. I've observed it first hand.
US economy up 200 pts today. Thanks Mr. President Donald Trump!!!
The Trump economy is strong!
Fat hurts wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
That is not true.
It's certainly true among a lot of evangelicals. I've observed it first hand.
If you think that pushing back against Global Warming scare tactics means someone distrusts science in general, then you are wrong. The problem is that Global Warming is politicized junk science being put forward as legitimate science. Distrusting junk science is not the same as distrusting science. Junk scientists like Global Warmists can not predict outcomes, so no one should trust what they say. Its actually good science to distrust Global Warmists.
Fat hurts wrote:
foo wrote:
My opinion is if you can reconcile evolution, science and God, more power to you. Fat Hurts seems to have done it. Good for him.
I never saw anything that needed to be reconciled.
Evolution denial has been a cottage industry for decades. Hucksters would travel from church to church preying on the poorly educated. They would be given time on Sunday morning or Wednesday night to tell the congregation that scientists are out there trying to disprove the Bible. These folks never liked the smart kids in school, so it was an easy sell.
Eventually, evolution denial morphed into distrust of science in general. So when the Koch brothers wanted to undermine client science, that was pretty easy too.
Now, you have to believe in a global scientific conspiracy to be a Republican.
Since your so pro science how many genders are there?
LOL Cat wrote:
Flagpοle wrote:
I am afraid I am going to have another meltdown. I have been promising that Mueller is coming and Trump is finished but after almost a year it seems that maybe Mueller is not coming and Trump is not done. It looks like I will be proved an idio. once again.
Oh, Mueller came already, and it was less than impressive.
By the way, check out Mueller in action. As you watch his incompetence, keep in mind that this was 5 years ago. Imagine how much his mental acumen has degraded since then.
https://youtu.be/yAN8P0dbzmc
You realize that was an impostor Flagpole, right?
1) Mueller is not done...he is definitely coming, and when I say that, I mean coming for Trump.
2) The clown is done.
3) Tons of video out there with Mueller where he is more than competent...even after that one you showed. I don't think you want to start trading video of Trump do you? Lots out there that show him for the imbecile he is.
4) I heard Mueller was that way in that video because he had just met your mother down at the docks. He could barely walk let alone talk. :)
Trickle down works! wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
It's certainly true among a lot of evangelicals. I've observed it first hand.
US economy up 200 pts today. Thanks Mr. President Donald Trump!!!
The Trump economy is strong!
The market (the Dow in your reference case) is not the economy. BUT, the economy is strong. Even IF Trump had anything to do with it, that would not justify his being a traitor and a criminal. Integrity and Country should matter to you.
Fat hurts wrote:
Obvi wrote:
Do you believe that your father has a soul just like you that continues on after bodily death? And that your father is equally important in the eyes of God as you are?
Yes I do. Continue with what you think is some kind of intellectual trap. This should be good.
Is it safe to assume that you think the same thing regarding your brother (or sister) if you have one (hypothetical brothers or sisters are fine in the absence of actual siblings)?