harriett harrier wrote:
Dropping back in to see if you guys still spend your Saturday nights investigating and posting about slow cheaters - yep! Keep up the good work you social butterflies.
Can I congratulate you on how convincing you think you are?
Nice. Good ole "your mother is a whore" joke. With that kind of cutting edge wit, it's a wonder why you didn't have friends offering better options on how to spend your weekend!
harriett harrier wrote:
Nice. Good ole "your mother is a whore" joke. With that kind of cutting edge wit, it's a wonder why you didn't have friends offering better options on how to spend your weekend!
Re "cutting edge wit" and the lack of...ah, never mind.
harriett harrier wrote:
Nice. Good ole "your mother is a whore" joke. With that kind of cutting edge wit, it's a wonder why you didn't have friends offering better options on how to spend your weekend!
WTF, "ole"? Has Dave become a bullfighter now?
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:
Hugh has confirmed that he has received my last emails with the evidence for Bournemouth and for Dave not wearing a timing chip at all. But he is not very talkative (until he finishes the investigation) and I don't think he wants to share the TomTom data at this point. I did let him know the TomTom data can be faked if he wants us to help analyze it.
Good. That's as much as you can do at this point.
I don't believe the Tom Tom data supplied by Terrie was genuine, because she likes to share genuine things, like the letter from Scott, when he couldn't be bothered to investigate properly.
If GENUINE watch data existed, Terrie would have shown us.
Not hard for one of his dodgy friends to tamper with watch data.
I wonder what time they faked it to?
After all, he confidently boasted a 3:12, then London came up with a 4:19 because of a "faulty" chip.
Would be hilarious if he faked 3:12 data. NO WAY could be run 1 mile at that pace.
Terrie, how'd ya go with this? wrote:
Nope. Still wrong wrote:The Fete did not happen, and I will contact WWTW my self tomorrow to find out why are they are saying it did. As Andrew knows full well it did not. Along with all in my village.
Terrie, how'd ya go with this?
Terrie, what did Andrew from WWTW have to say?
Haha, Terrie shoots herself in the foot again and then scores an own goal by providing a photo at the eleven mile mark which she thinks will put the whole controversy to bed, but no, wait, there's more, the big goofy galoot isn't wearing a chip in the photo she posted. So the saga continues because there wasn't even a chip on board the big shyster to malfunction, Hugh Brasher and Scott Overall please take note.
Well done Terrie.
Well done Terrie. wrote:
Haha, Terrie shoots herself in the foot again and then scores an own goal by providing a photo at the eleven mile mark which she thinks will put the whole controversy to bed, but no, wait, there's more, the big goofy galoot isn't wearing a chip in the photo she posted. So the saga continues because there wasn't even a chip on board the big shyster to malfunction, Hugh Brasher and Scott Overall please take note.
Well done Terrie.
Has she posted another photo? I thought she'd only posted mile 9 and last mile?
So he could have started around mile 8 or 9, then at half way jumped the barrier. That's the easiest place to course cut.
Deliberately leaving a chip off is crazy. Sounds like the whole thing was set up from the start.
Leave off chip - lie it was faulty - send in a fake bit of data to claim a 3:12 - collect 5 grand from sponsors for a sub 3:30 - pocket 5 grand, as it's sure as shit not been added to the charity money
Yes all the other photo proves is that he jumped on to the course earlier for an unknown amount of time, nobody wears a number without a chip unless they are up to no good.
Unless of course the story now changes to "it fell off".
Still very silent on the Bournemouth Marathon 2016 result.
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
Unless of course the story now changes to "it fell off".
Still very silent on the Bournemouth Marathon 2016 result.
Don't give her ideas!
She's already changed the story about the chip once. She has never mentioned it coming off, so she'll be rumbled if she now claims this.
She has NOTHING to say about Bournemouth.
Where are you Terrie?
For such a gobshite you've gone very quiet on that one.
And what about your contacting WWTW re the fete you claim never happened?
Terrie is a gobby gobshite when it suits her to be a gobby gobshite, right now it doesn't.
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:
Hugh has confirmed that he has received my last emails with the evidence for Bournemouth and for Dave not wearing a timing chip at all. But he is not very talkative (until he finishes the investigation) and I don't think he wants to share the TomTom data at this point. I did let him know the TomTom data can be faked if he wants us to help analyze it.
Mr Scam, I came looking for an update on the Dave and Terrie scammers and found the thread on Page 3!!!, WTF's going on?
WTF's going on? wrote:
Mr Scam, I came looking for an update on the Dave and Terrie scammers and found the thread on Page 3!!!, WTF's going on?
Hugh at London Marathon should have all the evidence he needs now but it is unknown how long he is going to take to finish investigating.
There are things I can't share right now but it involves me being the original poster of this thread under the "Also Suspicious" user name that I told Terrie I was a few pages back in my deal offer to her. But she didn't believe me. You will have to be patient in the meantime. Sorry to be a big tease.
Thanks for the update, these sort of people need to be purged from the sport otherwise we're all going to be dragged down with them and seen as a joke and laughing stock.
WTF's going on? wrote:
Thanks for the update, these sort of people need to be purged from the sport otherwise we're all going to be dragged down with them and seen as a joke and laughing stock.
Where you gone Terrie?
We love your meltdowns on here, especially the bad grammar, you uneducated thick scamming bint.
Come on. Where's your response from WWTW? Where's the TOM TOM data from London to prove he did this amazing 3:12?
Scamming pair of losers.
Is it just me or have some posts been deleted from this thread? I swear this thread had a few more posts in the post count. I landed on a blank page clicking on this thread and had to click back to page 103 to see the posts so something is definitely getting deleted.
Is Terrie reporting posts to get them deleted?
Terrie Up To No Good wrote:
Is it just me or have some posts been deleted from this thread? I swear this thread had a few more posts in the post count. I landed on a blank page clicking on this thread and had to click back to page 103 to see the posts so something is definitely getting deleted.
Is Terrie reporting posts to get them deleted?
Something odd is happening with bookmarks to this thread, I assumed that they had resorted to spamming obscene images again as they have no possible way of answering the Bournemouth marathon question or the lack of a visible chip at London 2016.
I have an offline archive of this thread from a couple of weeks ago and took another archive yesterday after the posts went missing. I've emailed the Brojos to get the deleted posts restored. I will have to check what got deleted. I think Terrie has been reporting posts for deletion for at least the past month.
Seems the sort of cunning, snide, underhand thing she would do, just par for the course with her, unlike us holier than thou truth seekers.
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:
I have an offline archive of this thread from a couple of weeks ago and took another archive yesterday after the posts went missing. I've emailed the Brojos to get the deleted posts restored. I will have to check what got deleted. I think Terrie has been reporting posts for deletion for at least the past month.
Why would they defend her and remove posts? I can see why they would remove porn etc, but why would the owners of this site want to defend these two lying cheats?