Genuinely curious…was this post a deliberate attempt at satire or did your critical thinking just take an unscheduled sabbatical? It’s not every day I see a take so staggeringly devoid of logic-even on LRC. I find myself wondering if the Wi-Fi cut out on you halfway through your thought process… permanently. Next time you try to assemble an opinion, maybe include some actual reasoning just to keep the rest of us guessing.
Always good when someone will write a novella about why someone is wrong without… actually saying why. Telling!
The fact that you can’t recognize why the post was such a catastrophic failure of thought speaks volumes about your relationship with logic. At best, it was a limp attempt at trolling. At worst, it was a black hole of coherence that actively lowered the collective IQ of LRC.
Always good when someone will write a novella about why someone is wrong without… actually saying why. Telling!
The fact that you can’t recognize why the post was such a catastrophic failure of thought speaks volumes about your relationship with logic. At best, it was a limp attempt at trolling. At worst, it was a black hole of coherence that actively lowered the collective IQ of LRC.
More contentless sanctimony.
Zero evidence beyond: “maybe it’s age”
You all have given up completely. It’s good to be king 👑
The fact that you can’t recognize why the post was such a catastrophic failure of thought speaks volumes about your relationship with logic. At best, it was a limp attempt at trolling. At worst, it was a black hole of coherence that actively lowered the collective IQ of LRC.
More contentless sanctimony.
Zero evidence beyond: “maybe it’s age”
You all have given up completely. It’s good to be king 👑
Yawn. Oh, we’re still pretending Djokovic isn’t the GOAT? Fine. I’ve got five minutes and a low tolerance for delusion. Let’s play the “prove he’s not” game.
Show me: 1) A male player with more than 24 Grand Slam titles. Spoiler: you can’t
2) Someone who’s spent more than 373 weeks ranked No. 1. Federer? 310. Nadal? 209. Djokovic? Still king
3) A guy who’s won all nine ATP Masters 1000 events—not once, but multiple times. That’s called the Career Golden Masters, and Djokovic owns two. Rest of tennis history? 0
4) A better head-to-head record against both Federer and Nadal. Djokovic leads both. Comfortably.
5) More ATP Finals titles? He’s got seven
6) A higher win percentage across Grand Slams? Djokovic’s career Slam win rate hovers around 88%, which is absurd
7) Number of Career Grand Slams? Djokovic - 3. Rest of players in tennis history - 4. Plus the Golden Slam.
So yeah, if you’ve got some magical stat that dethrones him, I’m all ears. Otherwise, I’ll be over here bored, but correct.
GOAT debates are great until facts show up. 👑 What’s next? Questioning gravity?
You all have given up completely. It’s good to be king 👑
Yawn. Oh, we’re still pretending Djokovic isn’t the GOAT? Fine. I’ve got five minutes and a low tolerance for delusion. Let’s play the “prove he’s not” game.
Show me: 1) A male player with more than 24 Grand Slam titles. Spoiler: you can’t
2) Someone who’s spent more than 373 weeks ranked No. 1. Federer? 310. Nadal? 209. Djokovic? Still king
3) A guy who’s won all nine ATP Masters 1000 events—not once, but multiple times. That’s called the Career Golden Masters, and Djokovic owns two. Rest of tennis history? 0
4) A better head-to-head record against both Federer and Nadal. Djokovic leads both. Comfortably.
5) More ATP Finals titles? He’s got seven
6) A higher win percentage across Grand Slams? Djokovic’s career Slam win rate hovers around 88%, which is absurd
7) Number of Career Grand Slams? Djokovic - 3. Rest of players in tennis history - 4. Plus the Golden Slam.
So yeah, if you’ve got some magical stat that dethrones him, I’m all ears. Otherwise, I’ll be over here bored, but correct.
GOAT debates are great until facts show up. 👑 What’s next? Questioning gravity?
Let’s not forget an Olympic🥇
Can’t wait til 2600bro weighs back in on this too as a SME😂🤡
Yawn. Oh, we’re still pretending Djokovic isn’t the GOAT? Fine. I’ve got five minutes and a low tolerance for delusion. Let’s play the “prove he’s not” game.
Show me: 1) A male player with more than 24 Grand Slam titles. Spoiler: you can’t
2) Someone who’s spent more than 373 weeks ranked No. 1. Federer? 310. Nadal? 209. Djokovic? Still king
3) A guy who’s won all nine ATP Masters 1000 events—not once, but multiple times. That’s called the Career Golden Masters, and Djokovic owns two. Rest of tennis history? 0
4) A better head-to-head record against both Federer and Nadal. Djokovic leads both. Comfortably.
5) More ATP Finals titles? He’s got seven
6) A higher win percentage across Grand Slams? Djokovic’s career Slam win rate hovers around 88%, which is absurd
7) Number of Career Grand Slams? Djokovic - 3. Rest of players in tennis history - 4. Plus the Golden Slam.
So yeah, if you’ve got some magical stat that dethrones him, I’m all ears. Otherwise, I’ll be over here bored, but correct.
GOAT debates are great until facts show up. 👑 What’s next? Questioning gravity?
Let’s not forget an Olympic🥇
Can’t wait til 2600bro weighs back in on this too as a SME😂🤡
Misery loves company.
I mean, you alluded to it. But thats lost on Harambe.
I wonder if he wore his crown to the No Kings rally nearby and demanded that everyone call him “Doctor?”
Djoker could have put the GOAT debate to rest with once simple vaccination.
Instead we have 11 pages of crying from "tennis fans"
Pretty hilarious - will be talked about generations; generational stupidity :)
So we’re doing bold claims with zero backup now? Stellar strategy. Really.
Why bother with facts, reasoning, or even a bit of supporting evidence when you can just say things loudly and hope they sound true? If I wanted fiction, I’d read a novel. At least those usually have a plot.
Although if Lebron had been a tennis played instead, there would be no debate, or vaccination controversy.
LeFlop? The goat? 😂🤣🤦♂️You trying to insert yourself into basketball now too?
Dude, tell us you’re a fool without telling us you’re a fool.
Stick to exercise phys and demanding that people call you “doctor.”
I can’t keep up with you people. Was it one shot or three? Even a fool has to concede what a magical feat winning a gold medal while suffering from long Covid would have to be🤡🤡🤡
Although if Lebron had been a tennis played instead, there would be no debate, or vaccination controversy.
LeFlop? The goat? 😂🤣🤦♂️You trying to insert yourself into basketball now too?
Dude, tell us you’re a fool without telling us you’re a fool.
Stick to exercise phys and demanding that people call you “doctor.”
I can’t keep up with you people. Was it one shot or three? Even a fool has to concede what a magical feat winning a gold medal while suffering from long Covid would have to be🤡🤡🤡
No kidding. I’m confused. Was that a post or just a fever dream typed out with reckless abandon? I read it three times trying to find the point, and all I found was an existential crisis wrapped in confused punctuation and poor grammar. In the future, he might want to recruit a wingman (someone who can spot a coherent thought) just to keep him from hitting “Post Reply” while his brain’s clearly out to lunch.
I’m genuinely embarrassed for the guy. His post was such a tangled mess of nonsense, I half expected it to end with “approved by Harambe.”
You all have given up completely. It’s good to be king 👑
Yawn. Oh, we’re still pretending Djokovic isn’t the GOAT? Fine. I’ve got five minutes and a low tolerance for delusion. Let’s play the “prove he’s not” game.
Show me: 1) A male player with more than 24 Grand Slam titles. Spoiler: you can’t
2) Someone who’s spent more than 373 weeks ranked No. 1. Federer? 310. Nadal? 209. Djokovic? Still king
3) A guy who’s won all nine ATP Masters 1000 events—not once, but multiple times. That’s called the Career Golden Masters, and Djokovic owns two. Rest of tennis history? 0
4) A better head-to-head record against both Federer and Nadal. Djokovic leads both. Comfortably.
5) More ATP Finals titles? He’s got seven
6) A higher win percentage across Grand Slams? Djokovic’s career Slam win rate hovers around 88%, which is absurd
7) Number of Career Grand Slams? Djokovic - 3. Rest of players in tennis history - 4. Plus the Golden Slam.
So yeah, if you’ve got some magical stat that dethrones him, I’m all ears. Otherwise, I’ll be over here bored, but correct.
GOAT debates are great until facts show up. 👑 What’s next? Questioning gravity?
Again these kinds of numerological arguments just show you’re not a deep tennis fan. You see it as science experiment or something.
Chokervic played during the twilight of Nadal and Fed. His competition was far weaker for many of his slams. His path was objectively easier. BUT, he still is a clear contender, probably the leader, for GOAT.
His case would be ironclad, though, if he hadn’t missed a few tourneys in his prime due to vax mandates and if he hadn’t fallen off so hard when he got long COVID.
Thus, it’s clear to say, Chokervic would be the uncontested GOAT if he weren’t an antivaxxer. But for now, due to his choices, we are still having the debate.
It’s great for us sports fans, but bad for his legacy.
Djoker could have put the GOAT debate to rest with once simple vaccination.
Instead we have 11 pages of crying from "tennis fans"
Pretty hilarious - will be talked about generations; generational stupidity :)
So we’re doing bold claims with zero backup now? Stellar strategy. Really.
Why bother with facts, reasoning, or even a bit of supporting evidence when you can just say things loudly and hope they sound true? If I wanted fiction, I’d read a novel. At least those usually have a plot.
I mean it’s objective that Chokervic would have a more solid GOAT case with a few more slams and no crazy fall off. Nothing controversial there.
It’s also true that you guys are not real students of the game - hence the copy paste from tennis-reference as your evidence.
Anyway, as I’ve said, a GOAT doesn’t need legions of (beta) men fawning over the accolades. A GOAT stands alone.
Although if Lebron had been a tennis played instead, there would be no debate, or vaccination controversy.
LeFlop? The goat? 😂🤣🤦♂️You trying to insert yourself into basketball now too?
Dude, tell us you’re a fool without telling us you’re a fool.
Stick to exercise phys and demanding that people call you “doctor.”
I can’t keep up with you people. Was it one shot or three? Even a fool has to concede what a magical feat winning a gold medal while suffering from long Covid would have to be🤡🤡🤡
It’s funny that you guys use numbers to defend Chokervic but apparently LeBron who’s by far the best numerically isn’t the goat?
Yawn. Oh, we’re still pretending Djokovic isn’t the GOAT? Fine. I’ve got five minutes and a low tolerance for delusion. Let’s play the “prove he’s not” game.
Show me: 1) A male player with more than 24 Grand Slam titles. Spoiler: you can’t
2) Someone who’s spent more than 373 weeks ranked No. 1. Federer? 310. Nadal? 209. Djokovic? Still king
3) A guy who’s won all nine ATP Masters 1000 events—not once, but multiple times. That’s called the Career Golden Masters, and Djokovic owns two. Rest of tennis history? 0
4) A better head-to-head record against both Federer and Nadal. Djokovic leads both. Comfortably.
5) More ATP Finals titles? He’s got seven
6) A higher win percentage across Grand Slams? Djokovic’s career Slam win rate hovers around 88%, which is absurd
7) Number of Career Grand Slams? Djokovic - 3. Rest of players in tennis history - 4. Plus the Golden Slam.
So yeah, if you’ve got some magical stat that dethrones him, I’m all ears. Otherwise, I’ll be over here bored, but correct.
GOAT debates are great until facts show up. 👑 What’s next? Questioning gravity?
Chokervic played during the twilight of Nadal and Fed. His competition was far weaker for many of his slams. His path was objectively easier. BUT, he still is a clear contender, probably the leader, for GOAT.
It’s almost as if you are saying that Djoker only beat Fed and Nadal because they were past their prime due to their age.
Lol. This is just too easy. Oh buddy, you didn’t just fall into a trap, you somersaulted into it while narrating your own downfall. Yours wasn’t a response; it was a cautionary tale for anyone considering typing before thinking.
But hey, good on you and your buddy for at least showing up. Next time, bring a thought that’s been fully baked, or at least microwaved. I’ll keep the trap warm.
LeFlop? The goat? 😂🤣🤦♂️You trying to insert yourself into basketball now too?
Dude, tell us you’re a fool without telling us you’re a fool.
Stick to exercise phys and demanding that people call you “doctor.”
I can’t keep up with you people. Was it one shot or three? Even a fool has to concede what a magical feat winning a gold medal while suffering from long Covid would have to be🤡🤡🤡
It’s funny that you guys use numbers to defend Chokervic but apparently LeBron who’s by far the best numerically isn’t the goat?
I smell inconsistency…. Uh oh
You contradict yourself actually as you (2600bro) are saying LeFlop is the goat, numerically speaking, which isn’t even true… it’s subjectively true in certain categories like points scored but not so in other categories like MVP awards or championships. But then you can’t or won’t accept, numerically speaking, that Djokovic is the goat because he leads almost every single category.
BUT, to YOUR point, what makes him the goat more than anything else is the fact, according to you, that he won an Olympic gold medal WHILE suffering from long COVID. I mean, nobody is ever going to top that circus act.
You, who fancy yourself the King, are not good at arguing. But arguing you do because you simply cannot restrain your ego. It is something to see…🤡🤡🤡
Chokervic played during the twilight of Nadal and Fed. His competition was far weaker for many of his slams. His path was objectively easier. BUT, he still is a clear contender, probably the leader, for GOAT.
It’s almost as if you are saying that Djoker only beat Fed and Nadal because they were past their prime due to their age.
Lol. This is just too easy. Oh buddy, you didn’t just fall into a trap, you somersaulted into it while narrating your own downfall. Yours wasn’t a response; it was a cautionary tale for anyone considering typing before thinking.
But hey, good on you and your buddy for at least showing up. Next time, bring a thought that’s been fully baked, or at least microwaved. I’ll keep the trap warm.
#StilltheKing 👑
Lol, perfect 😂🤦♂️🤡
The obsession with the reflection precedes the downfall.
Yawn. Oh, we’re still pretending Djokovic isn’t the GOAT? Fine. I’ve got five minutes and a low tolerance for delusion. Let’s play the “prove he’s not” game.
Show me: 1) A male player with more than 24 Grand Slam titles. Spoiler: you can’t
2) Someone who’s spent more than 373 weeks ranked No. 1. Federer? 310. Nadal? 209. Djokovic? Still king
3) A guy who’s won all nine ATP Masters 1000 events—not once, but multiple times. That’s called the Career Golden Masters, and Djokovic owns two. Rest of tennis history? 0
4) A better head-to-head record against both Federer and Nadal. Djokovic leads both. Comfortably.
5) More ATP Finals titles? He’s got seven
6) A higher win percentage across Grand Slams? Djokovic’s career Slam win rate hovers around 88%, which is absurd
7) Number of Career Grand Slams? Djokovic - 3. Rest of players in tennis history - 4. Plus the Golden Slam.
So yeah, if you’ve got some magical stat that dethrones him, I’m all ears. Otherwise, I’ll be over here bored, but correct.
GOAT debates are great until facts show up. 👑 What’s next? Questioning gravity?
Again these kinds of numerological arguments just show you’re not a deep tennis fan. You see it as science experiment or something.
Chokervic played during the twilight of Nadal and Fed. His competition was far weaker for many of his slams. His path was objectively easier. BUT, he still is a clear contender, probably the leader, for GOAT.
His case would be ironclad, though, if he hadn’t missed a few tourneys in his prime due to vax mandates and if he hadn’t fallen off so hard when he got long COVID.
Thus, it’s clear to say, Chokervic would be the uncontested GOAT if he weren’t an antivaxxer. But for now, due to his choices, we are still having the debate.
It’s great for us sports fans, but bad for his legacy.
This discussion is so one-sided, I’m starting to feel guilty for showing up armed with coherence while you arrive dressed in confusion and carrying a kazoo. Next time, bring receipts… or at least a thesis that doesn’t read like magnet poetry flung at a fridge.
It’s funny that you guys use numbers to defend Chokervic but apparently LeBron who’s by far the best numerically isn’t the goat?
I smell inconsistency…. Uh oh
BUT, to YOUR point, what makes him the goat more than anything else is the fact, according to you, that he won an Olympic gold medal WHILE suffering from long COVID. I mean, nobody is ever going to top that circus act.
Does Harambe think that Djoker won Olympic gold while suffering from long covid? Seriously?
Unless Harambe is confusing “long covid” with “long career,” that claim’s about as medically sound as diagnosing tennis elbow from a horoscope. No need to cheapen a legendary win by dressing it up in a medically implausible diagnosis.
I imagine Harambe has about as much supporting information for that argument as he has been able to muster thus far for Djoker not being the GOAT. Nil.
It’s funny that you guys use numbers to defend Chokervic but apparently LeBron who’s by far the best numerically isn’t the goat?
I smell inconsistency…. Uh oh
You contradict yourself actually as you (2600bro) are saying LeFlop is the goat, numerically speaking, which isn’t even true… it’s subjectively true in certain categories like points scored but not so in other categories like MVP awards or championships. But then you can’t or won’t accept, numerically speaking, that Djokovic is the goat because he leads almost every single category.
BUT, to YOUR point, what makes him the goat more than anything else is the fact, according to you, that he won an Olympic gold medal WHILE suffering from long COVID. I mean, nobody is ever going to top that circus act.
You, who fancy yourself the King, are not good at arguing. But arguing you do because you simply cannot restrain your ego. It is something to see…🤡🤡🤡
Yes the famously subjective category of "points scored"
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.