question for discussion -
if a white person posted that he was going to kill as many black people as he can, then goes out and drives his SUV thru a Quanza parade, swerving into as many black people as he can, and then Fox news calls it "an accident on a parade route", do you think there would be moral outrage? Yes? so why is it that when a black guy does the same exact thing to white people, and it's termed an accident, people have no problem with it? they even deny it happened.
FOX news would be picketed. FOX news would be tarred and feathered. And rightfully so, for terming a racist attack as "an accident".
so why not the same treatment when it's A REVERSE racist attack? Is it because we don't care?
is it because of the narrative in this country that "racism is pervasive. all whites are racist. REVERSE racism doesn't exits, and black on white violence doesn't exist?
seriously. If a white guy did it at a kwanza parade, you KNOW it would be termed "a racist attack and federal attention needs to be paid so attacks like these don't keep happening. Racism is wrong. "
so why, when the shoe is on the other foot, is it ok to call it a traffic accident instead of a REVERSE racist attack? where is the outrage? Ohhhhhhhh, i forgot --- we as a society are so conditioned by the media that "reverse racism doesn't exist, so there's nothing to look at here - look at the capitol riot instead. racism is wrong. this isn't racism, it's an accident"