Just wow... wrote:
Good looking, smart, and can run!
https://twitter.com/anacabrera/status/990602625098899456?lang=en
Wrong! That hillary loving piece of trash did not.
Just wow... wrote:
Good looking, smart, and can run!
https://twitter.com/anacabrera/status/990602625098899456?lang=en
Wrong! That hillary loving piece of trash did not.
That is an outstanding time for her at that age! Great job!
She actually must work super hard for her success in running. CNN always tells us that only white men can have success in this American society, and that everything is biased against women and any skin color other than white/Asian, etc... Think how fast she could run if the world wasn't so biased against her? I'm guessing sub 34 at least.
another perspective wrote:
She actually must work super hard for her success in running. CNN always tells us that only white men can have success in this American society, and that everything is biased against women and any skin color other than white/Asian, etc... Think how fast she could run if the world wasn't so biased against her? I'm guessing sub 34 at least.
dude, STFU, that is some weak-a$$ and failed attempt at "satire/humor". Don't quit your day job (if you happen to be employed).
That name sounded so familiar, couldn't put my finger on it. Reading this thread was a very satisfying itch to scratch finding out she's a WSU runner. IIRC she was a SW Washington high schooler.
Just wow... wrote:
Good looking, smart, and can run!
https://twitter.com/anacabrera/status/990602625098899456?lang=en
Not even one of those adjectives are even remotely true.
another perspective wrote:
She actually must work super hard for her success in running. CNN always tells us that only white men can have success in this American society, and that everything is biased against women and any skin color other than white/Asian, etc... Think how fast she could run if the world wasn't so biased against her? I'm guessing sub 34 at least.
If she fully utilized her white privilege, she’d be able to go sub-34 easy.
Slowpokemon wrote:
Trump wrote:
She’s a hobby jogger loser. Sad.
Fake news.
You're just mad cause a 37 year old lady is faster than you. Back to the grind, buddy.
It's highly likely that 98% of all 37-year-old females that ran D1 and still run at least 15-20 mpw could easily beat me in a 10k.
STFU dummy wrote:
another perspective wrote:
She actually must work super hard for her success in running. CNN always tells us that only white men can have success in this American society, and that everything is biased against women and any skin color other than white/Asian, etc... Think how fast she could run if the world wasn't so biased against her? I'm guessing sub 34 at least.
dude, STFU, that is some weak-a$$ and failed attempt at "satire/humor". Don't quit your day job (if you happen to be employed).
You a program director at CNN? Hit a little too close to home with my satire/humor???
I wonder if Abigail Tracy (Vanity Fair) still runs.
Some lunatic wrote:
WR mile?? wrote:
She ran a 2:23 mile???
Impressive.
That was indoors , the tracks are shorter, try and keep up.
Kudos! :)
That's great! Which one in the photo is the 'good looking' one, though?
+1
Trump wrote:
She’s a hobby jogger loser. Sad.
Fake news.
How many where-it's-at buzzwords can one poster use in a single post? Here are this schmuck's offerings:
"Trump"
"hobby jogger"
"loser"
"Fake news".
Brilliant display of creativity and intelligence, Trump!
And you didn't even choose another convenient reference, "drug cheat"! Next time, I guess.
To quote: "Sad."
Dang she’s pretty quick.
4 posts were removed from this page.