Transhumans ARE humans wrote:
https://vangogh.teespring.com/v3/image/yQwgsbYlsa-cjcvjzwsc0gkD_QA/480/560.jpg
Men are human, too. So they should be able to compete in women's sport. Oh, wait..
Unfair that you're a Transphobe wrote:
https://twitter.com/rachelvmckinnon/status/1114646031243841542
I think it's possible to be a "McKinnophobe" without being a transphobe. In "her" case, it includes an aversion one might feel to preachy, manipulative, self-serving personalities.
People can call themselves whatever they like, but I wonder if this "legal" right to be women includes the right to bear children?
Of course, they should also be able to represent women in organisations that speak for women, or that require female participation, advice and representation - like Rape Crisis, for example.
An admission of wrongness
Dude, I just want to offer my apologies. A few weeks ago on another of the many, many iterations of this thread I said you needed to calm down a bit on this particular trolling; that people would see through it and just stop responding if you kept over-egging it.
I now see that was clearly wrong so again my apologies, keep up the good work ?
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/dr-rachel-mckinnon-rhys-mckinnon-rachel-veronica-mckinnon-foxy-moxy.49422/Armstronglivs wrote:
Unfair that you're a Transphobe wrote:
https://twitter.com/rachelvmckinnon/status/1114646031243841542I think it's possible to be a "McKinnophobe" without being a transphobe. In "her" case, it includes an aversion one might feel to preachy, manipulative, self-serving personalities.
People can call themselves whatever they like, but I wonder if this "legal" right to be women includes the right to bear children?
Of course, they should also be able to represent women in organisations that speak for women, or that require female participation, advice and representation - like Rape Crisis, for example.
Actually it's the trans people who are prejudiced. They are cisphobic, aggressive, threatening, physically attack people etc.
What will happen next? When guys can't get into the NBA, they can claim to be female and make it into the WNBA?
Has there ever been a female that pretends to be a male and qualify for Boston marathon, using the tougher standards of being 30 minutes faster than they have to?
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
One of the transgenders entered to compete, Stevie Romer from the article:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10155783533344343&set=picfp.584879342&type=3&theater
Mental disorder.
Asking for a friend, do you need to lie about being female when you qualify, or can you have an epiphany after failing to reach the men’s standard this fall and then start to lie about being female?
Sssddd wrote:
The problem is the arbitrary classifications that were created 100 years ago (women not being allowed to play against men).
There was a time when African Americans were not allowed to play in the NBA. That was crazy. Of course now the NBA is composed of 74% of African Americans (even though they only represent 12% of the US population).
Of course, a lot more caucasians would make the NBA if African Americans were no longer allowed to play, but that would be unfair.
The key take away here is that it's time to stop arbitrary segregation and allow women to compete equally against men. I think that the transgender movement will help this transition along.
We are in 2019, not 1919.
Your basketball analagy is not the same. Basketball has a higher black proportion than white, but whites still play, and many other sports don't share those same proportions. If women had to compete against men then thats it for women athletes. Literally none of them would succeed in any sports. Thats the whole point in gender classes. It's not arbitrary in the slightest.
What happens when one of these honnies runs 2:15.
Sure it is arbitrary. women are just as good as men. They have just been socialized to think they are not as good. I dare you to be a guest on the View and proclaim that men are better at sports than women. You will find out very quickly who is the stronger sex.
So...If there was no prize money at any race or no money in professional sports, would this even be an issue?
very good. the segregation of genders is arbitrary either way. This will lead the way to abolish this segregation. Just value the skills and performances of all humans equally. That would be a fair world.
semenyagoat wrote:
very good. the segregation of genders is arbitrary either way. This will lead the way to abolish this segregation. Just value the skills and performances of all humans equally. That would be a fair world.
There won't be much "to value in the skills and performances of women" if they have to compete in sport against men. A strange notion of "fairness".
Right equal opportunity is the only fair way out of this situation. Line everyone up and let the chips fall where they may. No age, sex, race etc. Just one category for all. This is the only fair way to handle our society in general. Then we can sit back and enjoy the best performances and stop all this nonsense-presto everyone is happy.
loki wrote:
Right equal opportunity is the only fair way out of this situation. Line everyone up and let the chips fall where they may. No age, sex, race etc. Just one category for all. This is the only fair way to handle our society in general. Then we can sit back and enjoy the best performances and stop all this nonsense-presto everyone is happy.
Won't do you much good though, will it? Best you "identify".
Dayum, I wish I was that buff
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
One of the transgenders entered to compete, Stevie Romer from the article:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10155783533344343&set=picfp.584879342&type=3&theater
Little Miss Muffet from Notre Dame is making all sorts of claims about bias in society and how unfair it is that men coach women's sports. colleges want to win so they probably hire best candidate. If she ultimately gets her way, she would probably bot have a job because there would only 1/2 as many jobs because there should be no separate team for women.
