Thanks for the input. We will see ??♂️
Thanks for the input. We will see ??♂️
Some days we'll do 5-10 30m Flys. Other days we'll do things like 200, 150, 100s for three sets (timed) with rest in between. We've never ran over 250m in practice so far. Workout changes from week to week.
JayTheRunner wrote:
Some days we'll do 5-10 30m Flys. Other days we'll do things like 200, 150, 100s for three sets (timed) with rest in between. We've never ran over 250m in practice so far. Workout changes from week to week.
What is your best 30m fly... timed with a freelap or beam?
I'm glad to hear you're taking a rest between your 200,150,100, especially if at max effort. Rest helps for high-quality sprinting. /s
Ok I want to clear up my ignorance here. How good is 10.7 at 19 and 10.2? What would equivalent mile times be?
Thanks everyone who knows more about this than me.
We don't even have a primary sprinting coach. There's one coach who oversees most of the events by himself. We aren't timed during the Flys, so idk what my time is.
Those are the similar to the numbers I'm putting up. It may very well be my biomechanics. I'm only 165 lbs and can squat around 425 and power clean around 300. I'm sure the power is there.
First, pretty much anything is possible.
A man's physical peak probably varies from individual to individual for sure.
However 25 is not his peak. The reason why we do not see many 25 year olds getting better
in the 100 is not many have a chance to compete at that age. You have to have a school, college, or club to compete for.
Bob Hayes of the Dallas Cowboys felt he was getting faster at age 28.
Darrell Green ran 4.3 for the 40 yard dash into his 50s as documented by Sports Illustrated.
Consistent, smart, and frequent training is what you need. That and positive self-talk.
JayTheRunner wrote:
Thanks for the input. We will see ??♂️
No, we won't.
0/10
Being that you're a geezer you just might not ??♂️
There's so much bad about your troll post, there's nothing good about it.
At least you could have made it funny.
0/10
Hill sprints, sleds? Without rest it’s hard to determine the type of workouts your doing from special endurance to speed endurance, extensive to intensive tempo. I assume theres a short sprint and long sprint group workouts?
Don't take the bait.
Of course you may likely be the OP posting under a different handle--and if so,
0/10.
Yes there are short and long sprint groups. We don't do hill sprints but we do use weighted sleds. We have rest in between reps/sets.
I appreciate your input. You gave me your 2 cents.. no need to continue.
I will keep pointing out your charade as long as you keep maintaining it. No need to continue.
Carib wrote:
CO Coach wrote:
This couldn’t be more wrong, the difference between a 10.7 guy and a 10.2 guy is evident a couple of strides into the race and is painfully evident by the 20-30 meter mark. It has nothing to do with speed endurance and everything to do with power. 10.2 sprinters have standing horizontal jumps over 11 feet and standing vertical jumps close to 40” or higher. If your basic power and strength numbers are in line with those numbers then you need to look at your biomechanics. Speed endurance is the final icing on the cake when your 50m and 60m times are in line with a 10.2 but you aren’t putting up the 100m times to match.
“Whatley” = “Brutal” from Sprintzone, was banned from both there and T&F News for being a nut, essentially. He is mentally ill and best left alone.
As for the OP, it is a bad troll job. Lame.
you're gross @Carib
as to address the initial advice, yeah I could see curbing deacceleration as being important if there is any
"speed endurance" would be the last thing I'd consider but OP is already well on their way to excellency, so having some sustained power to match the torque might be just what they need.
this is all hypothetical speculation but as a distance runner I can always recommend a sprinter to ascend to an event above if they lack inspiration.
just watching Usain Bolt in the 2012 Olympic 100 meter @ around 50 meters he's got some ground to make up, but he continues accelerating to victory....up until 75 meters it's a relatively even field.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O7K-8G2nwUendurance oughta be the finishing touch to the physical demand of a sprint, once you're on top of the game, the ability to finish is often what sets winners above losers
as to address the initial advice, yeah I could see curbing deacceleration as being important if there is any
"speed endurance" would be the last thing I'd consider but OP is already well on their way to excellency, so having some sustained power to match the torque might be just what they need.
this is all hypothetical speculation, but as a distance runner I can always recommend that sprinters try to ascend to an event above their most competitive distance if they lack inspiration.
just watching Usain Bolt in the 2012 Olympic 100 meter @ around 50 meters he's got some ground to make up, but he continues accelerating to victory....up until 75 meters it's a relatively even field.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O7K-8G2nwUendurance oughta be the finishing touch to the physical demand of a sprint, once you're on top of the game, the ability to finish is often what sets winners above losers
improved legibility of some of the low quality drivel in my post
Charade?
This answer is basically a combination of the above responses. .5 seconds is a lot to improve and it is more difficult to cut a tenth of a second when you are already running 10.5 than it is when you are running 11.0.
If you can significantly improve your power, start and acceleration mechanics, top speed mechanics and speed endurance, you could conceivably cut from 10.7 to 10.2. If you are already doing most of those things well, you are probably too close to your genetic potential to improve that much.
Standing vertical and horizontal jump distances are a better measurement of power than squat and bench totals.
Roids anyone?