i agree wrote:
sub 2h30 here we go wrote:
thanks for sharing this. I have to say that i don't envision myself doing most of these workouts.
Yes the 2h long run is ok but no way on 7 x Mile finishing with a 4:57 and 4:49 off 90 sec.
Also the 5k progressive in 15:57 sounds brutal. 15:57 is frankly very close to what I could run on a race for 5k (maybe 15:45).
10 miles progressive in 55:18 I could see myself doing but I would be very tired in the end and it would be nearly race effort.
I might be wrong, but these workouts to me sound more like a 1h09 / 2h25-2h26 guy than a 1h11 / 2h29
I agree with you. The training he listed is way beyond what I was doing before I ran my 1:10, which was my best mark at any distance at the time (I had only been running HM's and it was a big PR). But I know I race much faster than I train, so you need to be honest with yourself. If I posted my training leading up to my 1:10 and asked LRC if I can run 1:10, people would say it's a troll thread and not a single person would advise me to start at 1:10 pace. I think if you feel like you have a good idea of what you need to do in training to run your goal race times, you should stick to that. But don't pace like an idiot on race day because you're too optimistic. Anyway I'm not a marathoner so I'll butt out. Good luck!
You both are on the right track. I think this particular athlete could have run 68min for the HM at the time, but we ran one in the heat of August a in heavy training few weeks out from his marathon so it was 70mins. The following January he did run 68 low in another half. As for the marathon - he ran 2:28 on a hot day. I think maybe he could have gone 2:26-2:27 on a perfect day so take those times for what they are worth. You can get to 2:30 with some lesser sessions as long as you are consistent and put in the volume.