MO FARAH WILL BREAK THE 3000m WR IN BIRMINGHAM

DontFeedTheTroll wrote:

Not possible for anyone. That record is off the charts.

Yep. Of all the distance records, this one tops them all (up to and including the 2:00:whatever marathon).

Ha ha! Then watch him run 7:18 and have to slow down the last 20 meters to not make it look obvious.

Quote:

"Niels de Vos, Chief Executive of UK Athletics said: “Mo Farah is thought by many commentators to be the greatest distance athlete of all time. I could not agree more."

http://memes.ucoz.com/_nw/0/33783348.jpg

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM wrote:

You heard it here 1st folks. Remember that when you watch the Greatest Of All Time add another notch to his belt.

When I watched how far short El'G, Geb and KB came, I knew that record would be around for a long time. I congratulate Mo for having the guts to admit it is WR attempt, over the last decade nobody even goes on record that its a WR attempt. When Komen ran 7:20, he broke the WR by 5 seconds.

TrackCoach wrote:

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM wrote:

You heard it here 1st folks. Remember that when you watch the Greatest Of All Time add another notch to his belt.

When I watched how far short El'G, Geb and KB came, I knew that record would be around for a long time. I congratulate Mo for having the guts to admit it is WR attempt, over the last decade nobody even goes on record that its a WR attempt. When Komen ran 7:20, he broke the WR by 5 seconds.

He didn't admit it was WR attempt. All signs indicate a 7:38 jogfest.

doot doot wrote:

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM wrote:

You heard it here 1st folks. Remember that when you watch the Greatest Of All Time add another notch to his belt.

Trolls GTFO 🤦🏻‍♂️

This record is safer than El Guerrouj's 1500m.

Reminder: Bekele split 7:36/7 in his 5k WR. Mo looked like smeared dogshit humping out his 7:32 PR.

I'd bet a testicle that Mo does't crack 7:24. I'd consider a suicide pact for the WR.

Your testicle is safe but just in case Alberto comes up with some wacky infusion that actually works offer your neighbor's instead.😉

400 57.5

800 1:56.

1000 2:25.89 (59.26)

1400 3:23.55 (57.66)

1800 4:23.46 (59.91)

2000 4:53.18 (29.72)

2200 5:21.83 (58.37 - 29.72/28.65)

2600 6:21.58 (59.75)

3000 7:20.67 (59.09)

If there was a Kenyan who ran 3:28 and 26:46 I think people would say he could challenge 7:20

Nibali wrote:

400 57.5

800 1:56.

1000 2:25.89 (59.26)

1400 3:23.55 (57.66)

1800 4:23.46 (59.91)

2000 4:53.18 (29.72)

2200 5:21.83 (58.37 - 29.72/28.65)

2600 6:21.58 (59.75)

3000 7:20.67 (59.09)

If there was a Kenyan who ran 3:28 and 26:46 I think people would say he could challenge 7:20

Would we? What about a fvckin 3:26.00 / 12:50 Moroccan who couldn't do it?

Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:

doot doot wrote:

Trolls GTFO 🤦🏻‍♂️

This record is safer than El Guerrouj's 1500m.

Reminder: Bekele split 7:36/7 in his 5k WR. Mo looked like smeared dogshit humping out his 7:32 PR.

I'd bet a testicle that Mo does't crack 7:24. I'd consider a suicide pact for the WR.

Your testicle is safe but just in case Alberto comes up with some wacky infusion that actually works offer your neighbor's instead.😉

"You want a testicle? I can get you a testicle, believe me. There are ways, Dude. You don't wanna know about it, believe me."

I hope mo fastracks ti US citizenship and becomes Bernie Lagat v2.0

Bernard the Bonobo wrote:

I hope mo fastracks ti US citizenship and becomes Bernie Lagat v2.0

1. No way. Mo is wayyyy too British to do something like that.

2. Trump's Muslim ban.

I'll bet $10k that 7:20 doesn't fall by 2050

no

if a run is quick enough in a recognised meet, it means you become GOAT in just 1 serious run of your life

it is logic

if mo runs

- 7'22, is he GOAT ?

- 7'20 is he GOAT ??

- 7'18 is he GOAT ???

- 7'16 is he GOAT ????

it is logic

at what clocking of 3k in a recognised meet, regardless of 0/truck-load of medals do you need to become

GOAT ?

if a guy runs 7'16 but never won 1 medal in his life, is he is he not the

GOAT ?

above

who cares about medals few weeks after meet ???

same meet repeats itself yearly/2y/4y but WRS or fabulous runs come perhaps even in a generation !!!

the 1k/1500/3k are pushing 20y

7'20 is 20y ole & ageing !!!

see above

how long woud Komen's 7'20 have to last before he gets GOAT consideration ???

how quick woud a 3k have to be run by any guy to immediately get GOAT status ???

learn logic

Who invited Ventolin? Party's over. Go home everybody.

So Mo is a doper? OK. I really don't have doubts about that.

Those GOATS which broke WR (1500-10000m) decade or 2 ago were not dopers?

They were clean and can be and should be called GOATS?

Is there any intelligent people here (I believe there are many) who can believe that those results were clean and still can't be reproduced after 20 years (not even close) - I know that is the reason they are GOATS!

Those GOATS were on INDUSTRIAL amounts of PEDs, Mo on the other hand is on probably microdosing or when he went on "altitude" training in Ethiopia on the same industrial doses BUT he needs to clean himself before testing therefore he can't broke world records.

If he was competing in 90' well... who knows.

Now not even one of the others GOATS have ever been tested positive so they must be clean? Take a look at Marion Jones or Armstrong or even better watch Icarus movie and then rethink about your idols and sport in general.

Operacion Puerto - when investigators found evidence leading them to Real Madrid, Barcelona and Rafael Nadal all of sudden there were procedural mistakes and nothing hapened except in cycling.

Icarus movie - Russia should have be banned for at least 10 years in ALL sports but... money worked.

Daniel Komen when set WR on 3000m improved 18s in 1 year, but Bolt did 0.3s on 100m in a year so that is legitimate result since both were negative?

So Mo is dirty but nobody else is?

7:20 is not dirty?

So who hate Mo so much?

Americans - take a look on list of your dopers.

Kenyans - you have also to look for your dopers.

Ethiopians - well not to much busts but still... dirtiness all over.

If you think no cheating were possible from 2005-2012 watch Icarus movie.

If you think 1 athlete can beat others for 45s on 10000m race (Ayana) then you believe in Santa Claus...

And yes it was much more interesting watch athletics in 80's and 90's then now.

if anyone's interested, someone's done mathematical equivalents for distances, which i believe are far better than nonsense iaaf tables

iaaf tables are based on stats nonsense & have to change immediately someone makes a top 1000th or 10000th performance, but they only update them every few years, whereas others offer an unchanging "mathematical" equivalence which will not change to the dawn of eternity

7'20.67 off tired legs

( vid says he ran 13-flat just 44 hours before in berlin & looked totally whacked there

he got shafted in rieti with 57+ opener crumbling his legs more & another 57+ mid race )

imagine what he couda run if he skipped berlin & turned up somewhat rested in rieti & got a 58-low/mid opener...

doot doot wrote:

Nibali wrote:

400 57.5

800 1:56.

1000 2:25.89 (59.26)

1400 3:23.55 (57.66)

1800 4:23.46 (59.91)

2000 4:53.18 (29.72)

2200 5:21.83 (58.37 - 29.72/28.65)

2600 6:21.58 (59.75)

3000 7:20.67 (59.09)

If there was a Kenyan who ran 3:28 and 26:46 I think people would say he could challenge 7:20

Would we? What about a fvckin 3:26.00 / 12:50 Moroccan who couldn't do it?

I didn't say he could do it. I'm almost certain he couldn't. But he is immediately dismissed because he is Mo Farah. If he were a random African the possibility would be considered. Just because El G couldn't do it doesn't mean people didn't think he had a shot at the time.

Non sense. Mo will ran 7:15! Just yu weight for it

some suggested tables

go to a site which malmo is fond of, named

"~ ?tommy leonard +"

but i can't locate & there are some useful downloads

here are 2 i did save long time ago, for 0 wind :

9.82

19.64

43.78

1'41.56

2'10.97

3'27.43

4'44.13

7'20.46

12'39.00

26'14.57

or

9.70

19.40

43.30

1'40.60

2'09.77

3'25.63

4'41.73

7'16.86

12'33.00

26'02.57

sprinters i used to think best athletes, but it is just popularity from lotta 3rd worlders skewing with 10-flat/low

looking at those numbers, perhaps humans did evolve to be long distance runners with 10 - 20k being optimal running distance for hunting/evading ???