Flagpole wrote:
MITXC wrote:What are the recruiting standards for MIT? Specifically for the 1600, 3200, steeple, and 5k xc?
Go to the source!:
http://scripts.mit.edu/~hwtaylor/recruiting/recruitingstandards.php
Although I've been aware of athletic recruiting at M.I.T. for quite some time, I'm still disappointed to see this list of recruiting and (especially) walk-on standards. When I was an undergraduate at M.I.T. many years ago, the track and cross-country programs (and perhaps all sports programs) did no recruiting whatsoever, and the athletic department had no say in admissions decisions. Also, there were no "walk-on" standards; whoever showed up at practice was on the team. We had some pretty good runners and some really bad ones. I suppose I was one of the bad ones; I certainly never came close to any of the "walk-on" standards in that list. But running became an important part of my life, in college and for many years thereafter.
I think that I understand the case for recruiting and preferential admissions for athletes; maybe it's even good for the school, as long as the athletes are reasonably well-suited to the academic environment. But I don't understand why the M.I.T. cross-country and track teams have "walk-on" standards, which seem antithetical to the long history of participatory athletics at the school.