jamina ain't got no balls wrote:
Self-timed and hand-timed 300s... I'd say 54.
Probably runnining starts. And we know his endurance is horrible. I second 54.
jamina ain't got no balls wrote:
Self-timed and hand-timed 300s... I'd say 54.
Probably runnining starts. And we know his endurance is horrible. I second 54.
Imagine how accurate a prediction you could have come up with if you decided to just run a 400 instead of 2x300.
Just did the exact same workout 2x300 w/ 7min in between
friend timed me: 36.58/38.1
400PB - 55.82
100PB - 10.98
Yes. It's kind of funny that he listed his times down to the hundredths.
blacklivesmitten wrote:
Just did the exact same workout 2x300 w/ 7min in between
friend timed me: 36.58/38.1
400PB - 55.82
100PB - 10.98
I call BS. There's no way you can run 36.6 for 300, but only 55.8 for 400. Did you stop to crawl during the last 100? Seriously?
Jam It In wrote:
blacklivesmitten wrote:Just did the exact same workout 2x300 w/ 7min in between
friend timed me: 36.58/38.1
400PB - 55.82
100PB - 10.98
I call BS. There's no way you can run 36.6 for 300, but only 55.8 for 400. Did you stop to crawl during the last 100? Seriously?
Agreed, BS. Would be the worst 200 to 400 conversion in history.
californiacarlson wrote:
lease wrote:Were the 300s solo? Will the 400 be a race?
If both answers are "yes," then something right around 50.
Dream on, cowby. No way does he get close to 50. You got to remember he sits on his butt all day long.
Actually 50 flat is about right.
50 high to 51 low.
i did workout similar
300 in 38
4 minutes rest
300 in 38
4 minutes rest
200 in 24
ran a 50.6 3 days later
Sexyjamin wrote:
52.5-52.7
52 to 53.5 wrote:
Sexyjamin wrote:52.5-52.7
+1
I say sub 52 if you get a good start and run it right. I ran 52.xx consistently with terrible self-talk before hand and I had a 37.high 300 for the middle of a workout
BULLSHIT JAMIN.
you are not that fast.
OopsIcrappedmypants wrote:
51-52
Yep
Surprisingly, my legs are feeling fresh today. I'm going to go run 400m all-out and report back.
I know what i said wrote:
i did workout similar
300 in 38
4 minutes rest
300 in 38
4 minutes rest
200 in 24
ran a 50.6 3 days later
That is a tough workout with only 4 minutes rest, and a much better preparation and predictor.
jamin wrote:
Surprisingly, my legs are feeling fresh today. I'm going to go run 400m all-out and report back.
And when you run 54-55 later today, you'll say it was due to your legs not feeling so fresh from the workout yesterday....
53.3
http://i.imgur.com/4BEYVpY.jpg
My excuse is that I started out too conservatively. Was able to do a 25.9 200m a couple minutes later. The good thing is that I was very relaxed. I think the hill sprints are helping my form.
Plus at least 1s for self timing. 54s just like I said.
said that above wrote:
Plus at least 1s for self timing. 54s just like I said.
Way to rain on my parade :(
