k but wrote:
fred wrote:She's pretty slow
60m 7.78 0.0 Wollongong (AUS) 16.01.2016
100m 11.75 +1.9 Gold Coast (AUS) 21.06.2015
200m 25.41
Keep jiggling
Says more about how shitty Australia is at track than how good looking Jenneke is, really.
Sadly, that's true.
Did she sleep with Diak?
I really fancy Piper from Neighbours, she is a hot Aussie babe!!!
she's kind of a butterface... take a walk around most college campuses and there are way more attractive looking girls.
k but wrote:
Don't waste your time. wrote:I wouldn't bother, she's a look at me show pony same as Genevieve LaCaze.
Here in Australia we've got thousands that look as good or better than those two, but without the narcissistic ego.
Are they as fast?
Great intellectual discussion. Which is more shallow - who is better looking or who is faster? I guess genetics determine 95% of the good looking versus whay 90% of faster?
-Rojo
PS. That follow up video was amazing. Was it an ad for something. Who made it?
https://vimeo.com/55827146fred wrote:
She's pretty slow
60m 7.78 0.0 Wollongong (AUS) 16.01.2016
100m 11.75 +1.9 Gold Coast (AUS) 21.06.2015
200m 25.41
Keep jiggling
She would currently be about the 16th fastest American 100HHer in the Rio window if she were American.
Sorting by the 3 per country rule she's currently about the 25th seed for Rio as the second AUS behind Sally Pearson.
She has consistently improved 0.4 seconds/year. If she were to do that again this year, however unlikely, she would leap to #3 ranking going off 2015 marks.
She is up-and-coming for real. In any case a breath of fresh air in a gloomy period of our sport.
I'm down in Buckman - 10min from the Convention Center - I'll do it. Easy.
rojo wrote:
Great intellectual discussion.
-Rojo
Haha, says the man who got drawn here by the titillating subject heading, good onya Rojo.
Here's some more:
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=Michelle+Jenneke+&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&as_filetype=&as_rights=#q=Michelle+Jenneke&tbm=vidhttps://www.google.com/search?q=Michelle+Jenneke&biw=1188&bih=501&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj6l6aox7XLAhUM5WMKHV7IDJQQ_AUIBygCMy brah jamin has that in the bag
I agree - plus I really dont think she is that good looking.
In fact her face is ugly - look like a white aboriginal male.
Don't waste your time. wrote:
american male age 21 wrote:Anyone on here got the guts to ask her out?
I wouldn't bother, she's a look at me show pony same as Genevieve LaCaze.
Here in Australia we've got thousands that look as good or better than those two, but without the narcissistic ego.
I bet they are all forming a line for you.
Jenneke has got sex appeal that's more than just good looks - she's got it
Nah. Allison Stokke is my preference
How do you get that?She was ranked 26th last year. With the 3 per country rule, she's way higher than the 25th seed for Rio.
She would currently be about the 16th fastest American 100HHer in the Rio window if she were American.
Sorting by the 3 per country rule she's currently about the 25th seed for Rio as the second AUS behind Sally Pearson.
In my opinion, Ella Nelson and Annaliese Rubie are far more attractive Aussies!
Don't waste your time. wrote:
Poor Little Wallaroo wrote:Ooooh, she shot ya down mate
What part of:
"I wouldn't bother,
Here in Australia we've got thousands that look as good or better than those two"
don't you understand?
Whatza matter mate, you seeing your world through Fosters beer goggles? did the dingo eat your baby? She's a slinky little Shelia. Here in the states we've got an obesity problem, if you haven't noticed. She's more than welcome.
rojo wrote:
-Rojo
PS. That follow up video was amazing. Was it an ad for something. Who made it?
https://vimeo.com/55827146
You should know that this is not the forum for "intellectual discussion."
the follow up video was made by and for a popular website:
http://thechive.com/Also, I believe Ms. Jenneke could teach Lolo Jones a thing or two and make her learn to enjoy life, not fight it.
Don't waste your time. wrote
Here in Australia we've got thousands that look as good or better than those two, but without the narcissistic ego.
Most of the world prefers women without pouches.
Absolutely made my day. Great post. With all of the crap this board has produced lately, a good laugh is what I have missed. Thanks G-spotter.
G-Spotter wrote:
Only if the bag contains a chloroform rag.
the REAL Hingle McCringleberry wrote:My brah jamin has that in the bag