5'11"
139 lbs
30:59
65 miles/week
5'11"
139 lbs
30:59
65 miles/week
10K 34:42
age 43
height 6'0"
wt. 158
18 years 9 months. Sorry--missed that part.
Er... wrote:
5'11"
139 lbs
30:59
65 miles/week
Height: 5-9
Weight: 150
Age: 55
Time: 39:25
MPW: 30-35
42years old
58:32 10k
5'8"
170lbs
20 kpw
divorced
republican
$59k per year
2/10 ex wife
3/10 gf
bitter
1.88m
80kg
32:45
60-70km /week
22
32:20
6'4"
150 lbs
21 years old
80 miles/week
Have you asked ventolin for permission to post? If not then gather your data as she is going to delete your ass.
@darkwave
Don't worry. Your time of 39:55 is approx. equivalent to 36:55 for men.
@Lenny Leonard
You are correct. The Swedish model has an explanatory power of 43.6 %.
I forgot to mention the average 10K time for Swedish runners
10K time in sec:
mean=2250 sec (37:30 min)
stand.dev=113 sec (1:53 min)
Thanks to all so far for providing data.
Height: 5' 9.5"
Weight: 160
10K time: 31:25
Weekly mileage: 80
Age: 21
Maybe you only want one data point per person, for sampling reasons. But if not, here are my data six years later:
Height: 5'9.5"
Weight: 171 pounds
10K time: 34:45
Weekly mileage: 50
Age: 27
179cm
63kg
60km
34:30 (road)
Height: 5'8.5"
Weight: 140 lbs
10k time: 35:37
Mileage: 70
Age: 37
5'9" 153lb (BMI ~22.8) volume ~40-50km
5'11" 137
33:38
age: 45
112 mpw for 8-10 weeks
(was just four days into marathon taper and got out too hard, but a pr)
My weight was the same at 39 when I ran 33:51, my previous pr, on 100 mpw,
and weight was the same in college at 20 when I ran 35:20 on very limited mileage after injury--but previous months I had averaged 60-70 mpw.
Surprisingly decent estimate for me given the small sample size
BMI about 23.4 (based on 6' 0.5", 175#)
age 29
roughly 90 km/week of training at the time
formula estimates 35:42
actual run 35:15
35:48
5'5"
113
Age 28
50 miles/week
female (in case it matters)
Age: 21
Height: 6 ft
Weight: 180 lb
10k: 34:43 (road)
153 km/w
Formula predicts 33:28 I believe, pretty far off
50 miles/week
Watching The Detectives wrote:
10K 34:42
age 43
height 6'0"
wt. 158
statistics nerd wrote:
Hi all!
There are many factors affecting (running) performance. BMI (body mass iindex) seems however to be a very important factor. A runner with BMI=25 who trains 30-40 km a week and currently running 10K in 45 min has the potential to become a sub 36 min runner with only approximately two years of training, if his BMI goes down from 25 to 20.
I did some statistical analysis on 44 Swedish recreational runners who run 10K sub 40 min. The estimaton formula from Swedish data for predicting performance on 10K was:
10K time in sec=1902+19,5BMI+0,10Age-2,43Weekly training volume (in km).
Descriptive statistics:
BMI: mean=22,5
stand.dev=2,30
Age: mean=36,80 years
stand.dev=7,11 years
Weekly training volume: mean=39,30 km
stand.dev=20,11 km
Now, I thought it would be a good idea to estimate a new model with larger data. I have a lot of spare time :)
If you are a 10K sub 40 min runner, please provide following information:
Height,
weight,
10K time (in min:sec)
average weekly volume (at the time you ran 10K sub 40 min).
It's important to have information about the variables at the time you set your sub 40 min.
After gathering the data, I will provide some hopefully interesting results.
Kind regards from Sweden
6'0
180lbs
39:20 10k
No mileage-sprinter 200/400 type so only short intervals with 5 min rest
Forgot age. 39.