this really gets old wrote:
he'd get beat by most people shooting pool or playing ping-pong, too. why do you feel the need to compare him specifically to runners? for fitness, you can darn sure bet he's as fit as it gets.
Wrong. He is as fit as it gets, as defined by cross-fit, a for-profit business with a vested interest in propagating their definition of fitness.
If you asked most people on the street "what is fitness," the answers you would get most likely would vary widely from what xfit trains. Most people would support the idea of ideal fitness involving low body fat, moderate functional strength and speed, and excellent cardio health. It would probably be about halfway between your stereotypical distance runner and xfit "athlete."
When the Rich Fronings of the world die of a heart attack at 50 from excessive BMI and neglected a cardiovascular system, will opinions begin to change? It will be too late for the majority of the xfit proponents.
Distance runners don't claim their activities are the best for "fitness," but at least it contributes to decreased rates of heart disease and many types of cancer. Distance runners can always add weights to combat frailty as they age, stop running competitively, and turn into a jogger. For xfit participants, it will be mostly too late. You can't "cram" for a lifetime of cardio starting at 50 (although reducing BMI at this age does reduce morbidity a bit), but improving core and leg strength has been proven to be very effective starting as late as your 50s.