jimjamesrunner wrote:
Why do we not have even more fast runners? Because our culture tells us that if we haven't run a certain time by a certain age, we'll never break 4 minutes for the mile etc... If people would stop putting so much emphasis on age, I think you would see a transformation in the running culture of the U.S. .
Dude, please do yourself a favor and go out and by Sports Gene by David Epstein.
deja vu wrote:
NCAA age limits were discussed here:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=1000899If I understand correctly, the final word there appears to be the post of compliance chick, which essentially says that as long as you don't compete between your 21st birthday and when you enroll in college, you are not limited by your age. This rule effectively puts 26 as the oldest age you will tend to see, but in principle someone could only start competitively running at age 25 and be competing in D1 at the age of 30 (or ages 75 and 80, respectively, for that matter!).
The NCAA has changed the rule since then.
If at the HS gradudation, you don't go to college, your clock starts ticking one year after HS graduation. So pretty much the oldest anyone could be is six years out of college unless they are Mormon/Military as explained here on page 147:
http://www.ncaapublications.com/productdownloads/D114.pdf