Sean Fast wrote:
She should be DQ'd for hitting rollins hurdles. She knocked atleast 2 of them down. If Rollins were running slower she deff would of fell
Would OF fell? Seriously?
Sean Fast wrote:
She should be DQ'd for hitting rollins hurdles. She knocked atleast 2 of them down. If Rollins were running slower she deff would of fell
Would OF fell? Seriously?
Lala Land wrote:
Her peak was in Beijing 08. That's what happened. Sucks, cause she has consistently been one of the hotter girls in the women's hurdles.
Yep, she had her chance when her only competition was the fat chick from Canada and the white Assie girl.
She ran very well. Just got out talented....
Hallam wrote:
Lala Land wrote:Her peak was in Beijing 08. That's what happened. Sucks, cause she has consistently been one of the hotter girls in the women's hurdles.
I never understood the appeal of LoLo.
Brianna Rollins looked much more attractive then LoLo who looks like she has jaundice.
Hotter THAN. Jesus, the number of tards who are getting this wrong is unbelievable.
She hit 6 hurdles, none of them in her own lane.
LastChanceRunner wrote:
She ran very well. Just got out talented....
Bet that $780 check from bobsled is starting to look better and better.
I'm not convinced. Those times from Queen Harrison and Nia Ali are dramatic improvements. Something seems a bit off from that race.
Queen Harrison's previous best was 12.61. Here she blasts out a 12.43!! Before yesterday Nia Ali had never run faster than 12.67. Here she smashes a 12.48!!!
One person could make a huge breakthrough perhaps, but both of them at once?
I'd like to see those girls run those times in Europe before I take them seriously! I don't know much about Rollins but she does have a 12.39 from a few weeks ago to be fair.
Assuming she gets healthy in time for Moscow, Sally remains the one to beat. Write her off at your peril!
I'm amember of the workingpoor wrote:
LastChanceRunner wrote:She ran very well. Just got out talented....
Bet that $780 check from bobsled is starting to look better and better.
Ha ha ha ha!
Not convinced wrote:
I'm not convinced. Those times from Queen Harrison and Nia Ali are dramatic improvements. Something seems a bit off from that race.
Queen Harrison's previous best was 12.61. Here she blasts out a 12.43!! Before yesterday Nia Ali had never run faster than 12.67. Here she smashes a 12.48!!!
One person could make a huge breakthrough perhaps, but both of them at once?
I'd like to see those girls run those times in Europe before I take them seriously! I don't know much about Rollins but she does have a 12.39 from a few weeks ago to be fair.
Assuming she gets healthy in time for Moscow, Sally remains the one to beat. Write her off at your peril!
Queen has been running extremely well all season. Remember, she recently switched from focusing on the 400h down to the 100h and, if I recall, made a coaching change as well. Nia Ali is a huge surprise though and I can't imagine she will maintain that level. Sucks for Wells and Jones.