Have to agree with Chuck D on this one. 4 minutes is too short to see a big impact on performance.
As a heat transfer professional (when I'm not being a nut doctor), I can tell you that statements like "it was 110 degrees on the track" mean absolutely nothing. Your comfort level is affected by a bunch of things such as: temperature, humidity, sunshine, temperature of the surface you are standing on, wind, and even the haze level. When they ran the race the air temperature was 95F (pretty hot), the dewpoint was 55F (not particularly humid), there was moderate sunshine at 5pm, but the track itself was probably fairly warm cuz it's been out in the sun all day.
To counteract this nasty heat, the body dumps heat three ways: (1) sweating which leads to evaporation from the skin (2) *breathing*, because you take in relatively cool and dry air and it leaves your body warmer and more humid and (3) circulating blood close to your skin.
The biggest thing that kills you in the heat is dehydration and 4 minutes is way too short to get dehydrated. It is true that you will sweat more and circulate more blood and breathe just a bit harder, but everything I've observed is that it is all small potatoes, particularly for an athlete who is acclimated.
Like Chuck said, you didn't hear many complaints, did you? Didn't several runners get near their season's best time? Webb didn't, but that's because he didn't have a rabbit, the pacing was strange and nobody was pushing him.