If Letterman can take O'Reilly apart, or even a high school kid, I don't think Obama has much to fear.
If Letterman can take O'Reilly apart, or even a high school kid, I don't think Obama has much to fear.
NObama_Owns_You wrote:
Obama to damn dumb to figure out Bill's going to working.
What are you trying to say? You're using English words, but they are arranged in a nonsensical pattern and making reference to something about a talk show host, the president, the super bowl, and slavery. How can one person 'own' another in the US? Slavery was abolished almost 150 years ago.
I just hope Bill doesn't have any teleprompter trouble http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tJjNVVwRCY
The OP clearly is an idiot and here's why:
- He likes Bill O'Reilly
- He doesn't know English
O'reilly is a dumb f***ing hack who makes sleazy sex calls to people. He barely functions on the shittiest network on the U.S. and just yells at his guests till they give up.
Obama is the president, went to Harvard, and was the editor of the harvard law review.
If obama didn't have to be completely polite he would DESTROY O'reilly the shithead.
private sector employment fell significantly during bush's 8 years, while private sector employment grew significantly during 2010. Interestingly total employment grew a bit during bush's eight years, because he increased government employment so much, whereas government employment fell in 2010, so total employment, including the public sector, grew more in bush's eight years than in obama's 2010. The upshot is that all the ideology is wrong about the two, and that Obama's job creation record in the private sector (and soon in total) was far better in the single year of 2010 than in eight years of bush.
jjjjjjj wrote:
private sector employment fell significantly during bush's 8 years, while private sector employment grew significantly during 2010. Interestingly total employment grew a bit during bush's eight years, because he increased government employment so much, whereas government employment fell in 2010, so total employment, including the public sector, grew more in bush's eight years than in obama's 2010. The upshot is that all the ideology is wrong about the two, and that Obama's job creation record in the private sector (and soon in total) was far better in the single year of 2010 than in eight years of bush.
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/oct/25/nancy-pelosi/nancy-pelosi-says-more-private-sector-jobs-created/
Don't try bringing facts into this.
When will people realize that NObama is a troll trying to make conservatives appear stupid. That's the only explanation for his moronic posts. Amazingly, mez still agrees with him.
Weary wrote:
Obama is not going to be "worked" by O'Reilly (and by the way, he's NOT dumber than O'Reilly). Even O'Reilly knows half-time at the Super Bowl is not the occasion for a tough partisan political argument.
Do you use Roboforms? This sounds just like the same thing you post about Limbaugh. Does your little fill-in-the-liberal-rhetoric-blank utility just prompt you to put in a name and automatically construct the rest of your comment mindlessly or does it just read the thread and get the name itself?
So a comment saying that O'Reilly knows half-time isn't debate time qualifies as liberal propaganda?
Wendell Gee wrote:
When will people realize that O'Reilly is a troll trying to make conservatives appear stupid. That's the only explanation for his moronic rants. Amazingly, most Republicans
still agree with him.
Fixed it for you.
Son.....do you have some sort of problem?
not a racist wrote:
Hey racist. Obama created more jobs in one year than Bushie did in eight.
You're a liar but something tells me you know that already.
GURUU wrote:
Obama is the president, went to Harvard, and was the editor of the harvard law review.
So affirmative action worked. yea
NObama_Owns_You wrote:
And yet your following me around. Hanging on to my ever word.
Don't worry, next year in 3rd grade they will cover homonyms.
Honestly, do they NOT teach the difference between "your" and "you're" anymore? Is it that hard to understand?
To even be on law review, much less become the chief editor, you usually have to be in the top 10% of your class. And grading is done anonymously in law school.
Why do some conservatives become so surprised and offended they're called racists after they say racist things - like immediately assume a minority's accomplishments were solely the result of affirmative action rather than academic merit?
mez wrote:
"Who is Obama". That one would have been nice in 2006-2007. Noone gave a sh**. Obama created jobs! Good Grief, you guys will believe anything.
Ohhh crap.... Is this the same "Noone" that can beat Usain Bolt and Bekele?
The only thing O'Reilly will own before the superbowl is Rush Limbaugh's dick in his mouth.
At least John Boehner tried to be a sailor boy but cried for his mUmmy and stuffed aMiNals.
John Boehner wimped out of basic.
On the other hand, O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Hannity, Weiner (Savage) are Chickenhawks who dodged military service.
A bunch of fakes.