tunkcart wrote:
For a comparison, look at how top-level female college track and field athletes line up against high school boys. If you put together an all-star team of collegiate women, they would be a very, very good boys high school team. If you just look at one team, like Texas A & M, they would be a very good high school team--three athletes under 11.2, two under 22.75, 1 42.5 4 x 1 and a 3:31 4 x 4, a couple of 20' long jumpers. Plenty of HS teams could beat them, but not your poor programs or small schools. I'd guess basketball would line up similarly in terms of how good a women's college team would be.
That's actually not a bad way of looking at it. There are plenty of D-III mens track teams that would get smoked by top D-I womens track programs. There may even by a handful of D-I programs that are just crappy enough to get beat.
I would say the UConn women would win 65-75% of games against high school boys, 10-15% of games against D-III mens programs, and maybe 0.5% of games against D-I mens programs.