bumpity bump bump
bumpity bump bump
Anyone know if Wisco ran all there top guys? or were they sitting some out for next weekend?
corn fed wrote:
Anyone know if Wisco ran all there top guys? or were they sitting some out for next weekend?
Everyone but Maverick Darling was there.
individual results..?
Looks like they Maverick Darling didn't run. He would have been up front with Peacock and Krause.
No Chance Kid wrote:
Just Cause
http://www.uwbadgers.com/sports/w-xc/stats/2010-2011/10.02_wisconsin_adidas_invite_women_results.html
Thanks for the link to the results! Way to go, my 'Cuse women!
[Well, they *were* "mine"--I started the team--but I notice they've gotten better...]
Was this course short, downhill, or what 105guys in under 25mins. Makes NO sense at all.
WHAT?!?! wrote:
Was this course short, downhill, or what 105guys in under 25mins. Makes NO sense at all.
Perfect conditions. Course is not short or downhill.
adjkfhas wrote:
WHAT?!?! wrote:Was this course short, downhill, or what 105guys in under 25mins. Makes NO sense at all.
Perfect conditions. Course is not short or downhill.
So the winner runs 8:28 for the last 3k? Seems a little short.
Is that Providence's full squad? What happened with those guys?
WHAT?!?! wrote:
Was this course short, downhill, or what 105guys in under 25mins. Makes NO sense at all.
Does it matter? This is cross-country. Everybody in the race ran the same distance, that's all that counts.
Wisco held back ...
Unless Mohammed Ahmed is injured there is no way why he could not have easily won this race ...they are training through (like everyone else). Plus Ramadan was August to September this year so that is a low period for training.
Remember Ahmed was 30th at NCAAs, 27th at World Jrs.
Expect bigger and better for Wisco
Are you an idiot, or just a moron?
First you say Ahmed must be injured or he would have easily won, then you say Ramadan might also be involved. Mo (if the course was pretty flat and dry)ran at about his recent performance level - it's worth approx. a 29min 10k ands 14min 5k, which is what he has run. Might he run faster later on (because his training might have been negatively impacted by Ramadan)? Quite possibly. But that is no reason to diss the efforts of others in the field, who may be a little ahead of the training/preparation curve than he is at the moment.
Wisco is not the only team that knows how to hold back as well. Stop being such a stupid homer, appreciate that others might simply have had a good day.
everybody trust me, Mo is fine!
the guy is just training through!
top 20 at ncaa's im sure!
Indiana ran a very good last mile, it looked like even for WIsconsin except with the question of the 5th man. Ahmed had worked his way to the front. The 6km mark was 18-flat. Those guys really busted the last 2km at 5:29; it is a slight downhill to the finish but not by more than 10 feet or so. The couurse is fast, although the grass is not hard and short. This is not a golf course venue, it is a dedicated XC course maintained by the golf pros next store.
Indiana is really good, better than their good start last year. Wisconsin was deep but they have problems with four of the guys in the 5-10 range.
Wisco held off wrote:
Unless Mohammed Ahmed is injured there is no way why he could not have easily won this race
Easy on the drinks man, it's barely 4 o'clock.
What happened to Michigan? How can they be so bad? It is crazy that a school of 40000 or whatever can't get 7 guys to break 26.