McNeill will definitely be top 10.
My top 10:
Chelanga
Derrick
Bethke
Fernandez
McNeill
Mead
Bumbalough
Heath
Sheridan
McCarthy
McNeill will definitely be top 10.
My top 10:
Chelanga
Derrick
Bethke
Fernandez
McNeill
Mead
Bumbalough
Heath
Sheridan
McCarthy
BYU hasn't lost to Portland once this season, they've beaten them twice and I think Colorado and BYU will have a close battle somewhere in the top 5. Oregon is a ??? 4-7 tho for Oregon. W&M and Wisconsin won't be top 9. Alabama is a top 5 team also
BYU mormon wiggaz get good sleep and avoid partying
thus
i think they'll surprise
Portland has a bunch of young runners (as does Wisconsin), which tends to lead to greater improvement across the season than for guys that have been in college for several years.
I will be surprised if neither of those Ws end up in the top 9.
How can you rate NAU so high when one of their studs Erik Estrada has not run since pre nats? Is is planning on running? Is he injured or been sick. Without him they will not be a top 10 team. With him ready to race and he runs like he did at pre nats they are a definite top 5 team.
lkja; wrote:
McNeill will definitely be top 10.
My top 10:
Chelanga
Derrick
Bethke
Fernandez
McNeill
Mead
Bumbalough
Heath
Sheridan
McCarthy
Putting Elliot Heath that far down is just foolish. Look at the guys he's beat this year, including your third rank. Think again.
(_)>(_) wrote:
lkja; wrote:McNeill will definitely be top 10.
My top 10:
Chelanga
Derrick
Bethke
Fernandez
McNeill
Mead
Bumbalough
Heath
Sheridan
McCarthy
Putting Elliot Heath that far down is just foolish. Look at the guys he's beat this year, including your third rank. Think again.
with the exception of derrick, chelanga, and a fit fernandez, heath could beat any of the guys on that list
he could also have a reasonably solid day and place 7th-12th
thats the way ncaa cross is
We shall see, good man, we shall see.
i think Schirmer of Southern Illinois will surprise for top 10. He closed hard in the midwest to grab 2nd.
i dont know all that much, but i'll just throw out my predictions.
team: stanford
individual: chelenga
i'll be routing for byu though! go cougars!
you will all be shocked on monday. some1 has been holding back all year and he will unleash a fury of speed to shock the world and win NCAAs by 20+ seconds.
Teams:
1. OSU
2. Stanford
3. Oregon
4. NAU (if DE is healthy and runs)
5. BYU
6. Iona
7. Colorado
8. Alabama
9. Wisco
10. Portland
Indivuals:
1. SC Lib
2. CD Stan
3. JK OSU
4. GF OSU
5. DM MAU
6. RV OSU
7. EH Sta
8. HM Min
9. BS Ion
10.TD Ala
But as Dave Smith stated earlier in the year run the race 19 times and you have 19 different out comes for the individuals.
killer93 wrote:
you will all be shocked on monday. some1 has been holding back all year and he will unleash a fury of speed to shock the world and win NCAAs by 20+ seconds.
AJ is this you?
mideast?? wrote:
1. OK State - just too damn good. It's really not fair.
2. Stanford - they will give OK State everything they've got...I honestly think it won't be enough tho.
3. NAU - yes they had a horrible Regionals, but they are a talented group. Look for them to be top 5 at least.
4. Alabama - i've been riding the Crimson Tide wave all year. Their kenyans are very good, but not the toughest of runners. If its cold, count them out.
5. BYU - revenge of the 25 year olds! A very impressive regionals, and I think they'll do it again at the big dance.
6. Syracuse - they will run in a pack and finish with a 30 second spread from 25ish to 60ish.
7. Colorado - Whetmore, although with a less talented squad then previous years, always has his boys ready when it counts.
8. Georgetown - not the best average team time at Regionals (don't know how hard the course is) but could have 2 in the top 15.
9. Oregon - they may have been training through regionals, they may have not. We will see. Personally, I think they repeat their performances.
10. New Mexico - pretty solid top 3. Should be top 10.
Darkhorses for top 10: Portland, Providence, Arkansas.
You really don't think that Wisconsin is even a "dark horse" for top 10?
I'm going to assume you just forget them (somehow).
Why is there no love for Portland or William and Mary.
Portland wasn't even running two of their top 7 at regionals and they still beat Oregon. Also Kipchumba was their fourth man, he'll most likely be their first at Nationals.
Also William and Mary put 5 in the top 20, 3 in the top 10 at southeast regionals.
I think both these schools could be top 5.
1. Stanford
2. OK State
3. BYU
4. Portland
5. William and Mary
6. Syracuse
7. Alabama
8. Oregon
9. NAU
10. Colorado
And Wisconsin put 5 in the top 8 at Regionals, I think, and did not even run the guy who was 2nd at Big Tens behind Mead.
Shamwow wrote:
Why is there no love for Portland or William and Mary.
Portland wasn't even running two of their top 7 at regionals and they still beat Oregon. Also Kipchumba was their fourth man, he'll most likely be their first at Nationals.
Also William and Mary put 5 in the top 20, 3 in the top 10 at southeast regionals.
I think both these schools could be top 5.
1. Stanford
2. OK State
3. BYU
4. Portland
5. William and Mary
6. Syracuse
7. Alabama
8. Oregon
9. NAU
10. Colorado
excoach wrote:
How can you rate NAU so high when one of their studs Erik Estrada has not run since pre nats?
Poncherello is on their team?!? God Damn!!! They're my new favorite!
1. Stanford-84
2. Oklahoma State-116
3. NAU-175
4. Oregon-198
5. Alabama-221
6. Portland-239
7. BYU-251
8. W&M-266
9. Colorado-298
10. Washington-316
1. Oklahoma State- 90
2. Stanford- 146
3. Northern Arizona- 188
4. Oregon- 203
5. Colorado- 247
6. Alabama- 255
7. Georgetown- 273
8. Wisconsin- 275
9. Portland- 284
10. Iona- 316
11. William and Mary- 319
12. BYU- 338
13. New Mexico- 346
14. Virginia- 349
15. Syracuse- 372
[quote]26mi235 wrote:
And Wisconsin put 5 in the top 8 at Regionals, I think, and did not even run the guy who was 2nd at Big Tens behind Mead.
I've been wondering what Byren has up his sleeve. Peacock returning to form will help.