33 year old female teacher has sex with 13 year old student

Jimmy Carter Middle School's motto:

Where teachers prey on students like rabbits prey on presidents.

Better than Coyotes.

I lost my virginity to Miss. Stafford, the uh, voluptuous home room teacher.

you must be boning a 13 year old chick you disgusting douche.

Dave Matthews, Crash Into Me

jjjjjjjjjjjjjj wrote:

what's the name of that song, "boy's dream?"

yeah why are people so quick to point out that the boy probably enjoyed it but when it is a 13 year old girl sleeping with her male teacher it is sick and rape? I don't think potential "enjoyment" should even factor into the equation.

The anchor's name is Dick Knipfing. Do you pronounce it like "knifing" or "nipfing?"

I find it funny either way.

im still woman wrote:

It was his teacher. She's in a position of authority. She has a good job and some people never get the opportunity to go to college. She did and she wasn't worth the tuition that was spent. And no, it's not okay for a 33 year old to have sex with a 13 year old. No matter what the circumstance.

As a male, it is nearly impossible to imagine that a woman could "rape" you. Yes-- I guess in theory it could be done with a loaded gun or so, but it is really hard to imagine it outside of extreme circumstances...

Teenage boys are just plain old horny. It is truly hard for women to imagine how horny they are. I used to work at a newspaper at 16 and just looking at two of the 35-40 female reporters (both mothers of small kids) would get me going physically.

Given what testosterone does, I was more likely to end up being the aggressor with them than they were with me.

retard trap (ironic handle) actually wrote:

In other country's

countries

older people routinely marry kids even younger than 13.

hgh user wrote:

yeah why are people so quick to point out that the boy probably enjoyed it but when it is a 13 year old girl sleeping with her male teacher it is sick and rape? I don't think potential "enjoyment" should even factor into the equation.

Because:

-no possibility of physical rape-- even a teenage boy is physically stronger than a grown woman;

-no possibility of pregnancy;

-different levels of enjoyment-- as a teenager, I certainly enjoyed sex much more than the girls I was sleeping with;

im still woman wrote:

The boy probably got high fives from all his friends. He wasn't assaulted, the sex was consensual. The rape stems from his age being too young to consent. And it was not just some random 33 year old. It was his teacher. She's in a position of authority. She has a good job and some people never get the opportunity to go to college. She did and she wasn't worth the tuition that was spent. And no, it's not okay for a 33 year old to have sex with a 13 year old. No matter what the circumstance.

High fives? Most likely. But he never consented to sex because he is not of the age to consent. Whether he liked it or not does not mean it was consentual.

BTW - I want to know when kids became stupid enough to tell authorities about this stuff. I had a lot of teachers I wanted to nail... and would have never told ANYONE if we did. These freakin kids are dumb anymore! One more thing... usually these teachers are freakin hot! WTF is their problem that they need little boys instead of me, a real MAN!?

What The F wrote:

High fives? Most likely. But he never consented to sex because he is not of the age to consent. Whether he liked it or not does not mean it was consentual.

BTW - I want to know when kids became stupid enough to tell authorities about this stuff. I had a lot of teachers I wanted to nail... and would have never told ANYONE if we did. These freakin kids are dumb anymore! One more thing... usually these teachers are freakin hot! WTF is their problem that they need little boys instead of me, a real MAN!?

Who makes up the age where you can consent? The kid got hard, he consented all right.

The saddest part of this whole story is that a 13 year old kid nailed a hot 33 year old and most of the people on this website could only dream of doing that. I bet that kid can break 15 for the 5000m too...you poor losers...

haha, YO wrote:

What The F wrote:

High fives? Most likely. But he never consented to sex because he is not of the age to consent. Whether he liked it or not does not mean it was consentual.

BTW - I want to know when kids became stupid enough to tell authorities about this stuff. I had a lot of teachers I wanted to nail... and would have never told ANYONE if we did. These freakin kids are dumb anymore! One more thing... usually these teachers are freakin hot! WTF is their problem that they need little boys instead of me, a real MAN!?

Who makes up the age where you can consent? The kid got hard, he consented all right.

Legal documents and past precedence decide who is of age to consent. It's the American way!

Handlebar rides wrote:

The saddest part of this whole story is that a 13 year old kid nailed a hot 33 year old and most of the people on this website could only dream of doing that. I bet that kid can break 15 for the 5000m too...you poor losers...

I heard he ran a mile in 4:37 last year.

Nice.....

4runner wrote:

hgh user wrote:

yeah why are people so quick to point out that the boy probably enjoyed it but when it is a 13 year old girl sleeping with her male teacher it is sick and rape? I don't think potential "enjoyment" should even factor into the equation.

Because:

-no possibility of physical rape-- even a teenage boy is physically stronger than a grown woman;

-no possibility of pregnancy;

-different levels of enjoyment-- as a teenager, I certainly enjoyed sex much more than the girls I was sleeping with;

You're a moron if you think that most 13 year old boys aren't producing sperm and couldn't impregnate a woman of fertile age. You're a moron for failing to grasp the real meaning of rape, too. You're also a moron for not understanding that women can indeed manipulate males into getting something they want, they don't need to use physical brute force to do it. Doesn't mean the male must not like the outcome, just that it was probably the teacher making the first move and preying on the boy's emotions, hormones, and lack of discernment. Either way, the teacher was in a position of trust and violated that because she probably can't get a date with men her own age. If she can get dates with guys her own age and still went for a young teenager then she's messed up in the head, regardless of how happy it made that teenager. Oh, and you're definitely a moron.

I think well all know that there are 16 year old boys & girls that are perfectly capable of consent to sex simply for the pure enjoyment of the act. However, our society has deemed 18 the magic age, so until then the rule of law has to be followed.

You can't have a "male rape law" and a "female rape law", What if these were homosexual sex acts, would everyone be so nonchalante?

What The F wrote:

BTW - I want to know when kids became stupid enough to tell authorities about this stuff. I had a lot of teachers I wanted to nail... and would have never told ANYONE if we did. These freakin kids are dumb anymore!

"...has been charged with rape after she confided to a fellow teacher that she was having sex with one of her 13-year-old male students."

!!!