it happens. wrote:
Mistake in adding, 36 to 44 and 7 runners in front of Adams's 5th. No, Adams didn't "technically" lose to CU. "Technically", they didn't compete.
You need to look at all of the results. Adams had places 3, 5 6, 7, and 10 which adds up to 31. CU had places 4, 8, 9, 11, and 12 which adds up to 44. And by this results Adams had 5 in before CU's 4. But I will acknowlage that CU had a much better deapth in that they put 9 in front of Adam's 6. But before you make a statement look at the results fully.