Front page quote "Cuz chicks dig skinny guys" is not true. I know we love ourselves but chicks don't

Nut Doctor wrote: I don't think muscles rank super high for most chicks

Quoting from The Book Of Lists #2, copyright 1979, pg 305-6:

11 physical attributes men imagine

women admire most about them

1. muscular chest and shoulders 21%

2. muscular arms 18

3. penis 15

4. tallness 13

5. flat stomach 9

6. slimness 7

7. hair (texture, not length) 4

7. buttocks 4

7. eye 4

10. long legs 3

11. neck 2

11 physical attributes women really

admire most about men

1. buttocks (usually described by women as "small and sexy") 39%

2. slimness 15

3. flat stomach 13

4. eyes 11

5. long legs 6

6. tallness 5

6. hair 5

8. neck 3

9. penis 2

10. muscular chest and shoulders 1

11. muscular arms 0

Alex Trebec wrote:

T. wrote:

Personally, I believe if the girl likes you, she will like you weather you are big or skinny.

Obviously your wife likes "weather" or not you are stupid.

Obviously, your wife likes "weather" or not you are stupid.

Who are you calling stupid?

if you honestly think that the best way to get girls is to buff up then you are simply a meathead. i've found that girls will give it up more frequently than not to guys who can charm the shit out of them. not sure if my two cents are valid though since i am a naturally "bigger" distance runner (6'3" 200) but most of the guys that i know that get laid on a regular basis aren't big at all, but can talk to any girl at any time about anything.

rubnning is stupid and selfconscious runners are gay (and by selfconscious i mean all)

My life is an experiment...... wrote:

I hate to say it, but the vast majority of woman in this country at any age say I look way better at my new weight.

oh and i love how a "vast majority" of roughly 150 million people say you look better at your new weight.

This is true. I recently graduated college, and stopped running competitively. I am 6' and my ideal race weight was about 150-155. I am now up to 165. I topped out at 173 before I decided to get back into shape.

My girlfriend says I look way better with the weight now than I did. Girls do like skinny guys over fat ones, but skinny guys with some bulk in the right places.

Facebook Miler wrote:

skinny guys with some bulk in the right places.

Third leg?

running problems wrote:

rubnning is stupid and selfconscious runners are gay (and by selfconscious i mean all)

Sorry to hear about your "running problems". Too bad that when you ran you became stupid, selfconscious, and gay.

Have you stopped running? Are you still stupid, selfconscious, and gay?

Good luck with all that.

Height, I believe, is the one attribute woman find most attractive. It is not necessarily conscious, instead primitive in that taller is considered “healthier”.

If any of you insecure folks had a clue, you would watch some Derren Brown videos on youtube and start reading some NLP books.

OP is correct in that women are naturally attracted to men who can "protect" them. This is nature's way of ensuring that the female can safely bear and care for children.

But "protect" can mean many things: Height, build, money or intelligence. Any one of those will work.

Too bad most runners have none of those attributes.

This is absolutely true. If you are even half way good looking and have some game you can get laid. Doesn't matter if you are a skinny distance runner. If you have a lot of game you can even be somewhat unattractive and still get laid.

Now I wouldn't be so foolish to say that women don't like muscles, but I don't think they are that important to earning a woman's affection.

I still see the quote is on the front page. Some of you people that responded are delusional. Look at many of the magazines that women read that feature photos of what women consider as hot guys. Look at any movie that features the latest Hollywood Hunk. You won't find Alan Culpepper type of guys or any other 130 pound distance runner. They don't have those lame male reviews that feature Kenyan diastance runners.

I know all about having game, sense of humor etc. Here is the point...all things being equal from looks, money, personality, chicks would much rather be with a bigger guy with muscle then a skinny concentration camp victim looking distance runner. Get real people.

Since mostly guys read this site consider this. All things being equal, what are you attracted to and what type of woman would you want to be with...a woman with a flat chest or a woman with a nice rack? All things being eqaul 99% of the guys go for the rack.

Don't be upset by these facts. Are brains are wired this way plus our culture has programmed us to like certain things.

Plain and simple chicks dig guys with muscle over skinny guys.

Actually, my experience is that chicks DO dig skinny guys

For all your prattling on, pontificating, preaching, and postulating you have overlooked one fact in your own words that tells who you are at the core and is the most clear reason why you don't have the game you think you have:

My life is an experiment...... wrote:

I am a "single" guy and a "long time runner".

There is a reason why you are single. There is also a reason why you spend so much time thinking about your looks and then getting on a message board telling cyberspace your philosophy on women - you don't get many.

Have fun in fantasy land.

please dont squeeze the garmin wrote:

Quoting from The Book Of Lists #2, copyright 1979, pg 305-6:

11 physical attributes men imagine

women admire most about them

My life is an experiment...... wrote:

...all things being equal from looks, money, personality, chicks would much rather be with a bigger guy with muscle then a skinny concentration camp victim looking distance runner. Get real people.

"getting real" also means acknowledging that there are more attributes to a man than simply whether he has muscle or not. women are not nearly as shallow as men, so ruling out personality altogether is ridiculous.

It is true for the most part unless your a celebrity. I noticed the increase in getting laid once hitting the gym more and putting on 15-20 pounds..girls want to stay skinny and they want a tone guy...not necesarily a meathead but where you don't look white ethiopians like most runners

My life is an experiment...... wrote: You won't find Alan Culpepper type of guys or any other 130 pound distance runner.

Good point. It's really a shame that guys like this - hell, let's name names, specifically Alan and Ryan Hall and Adam Goucher - have zero chance of getting laid let alone landing desirable wimmin. I hear these three are really good guys but the chicks can't look past their ectomorphism.

All things being equal, what are you attracted to and what type of woman would you want to be with...a woman with a flat chest or a woman with a nice rack?

In my case, honestly, I prefer a smaller chest. You know that big rack is mostly fat, right? If someone has a talent for packing on the fat in one place (well, two places) they'll probably prove pretty apt at cultivating it all over. And it doesn't age well. My experience anyway.

Bottom line: anyone saying "women don't like _____ guys" is really saying "women don't like me". Women like skinny guys just fine as long as you bring something other than your bony frame to the table.

agreed.