I am not sure I will continue posting on this thread as the quality of the responses seem to be deteriorating.
For example, "whatever!" posts that many coaches are better than JK because he ahs not coached a national champion.
Still, he and the others who make this argument continue to miss the point.
It does not MATTER if JK has coached a national champion.
Tell me this; with all the remarkable records and medals of guys like El-G and Gebrselassie, are you going to tell me that their coaches are the best in the world?
Are you going to tell me that somehow their coaches telling them to do 10 400's in 57 seconds make Geb and El-G the runners they are?
Do you not agree that some athletes, regardless of whatever idiot is holding the stopwatch, will race well NO MATTER WHAT???
In the same way, you must not look at a coach based on the relationship of his athlete with the rest of the world but where the coach has taken an athlete before he took him on.
For example, if Gebrselassie was 20 years old and finishing dead last in major championships, THEN took on Kostre as his coach and instantly vaulted to #1, the case would be iron clad for Kostre being a great coach, NOT because Geb was #1 but because of his improvement.
Likewise, when Wejo was not coached by JK and did not even race in the national champs because he was not fast enough to being # 4 in the country and running 28:06, THIS shows that JK is a good coach.
As I said before, you guys who bitch and moan about this need to convince an up and coming star like Webb, Torres, Ritzenhein, or Cragg to be coached by JK.
I am sure he could take them to the top.