If it's irrelevant whether nandrolone is a PED, why did you start complaining about the allegedly misleading use of the term PED? Just for the fun of it?
The source was determined to be exogenous, with super high certainty, when CAS figured, in an unanimous decision, that carbon isotope ratio was not "consistent" - yes that's exactly what CAS said in their own words - with the only possible/alleged endogenous source. Whether it was from Amazon or her team doctor or boyfriend or neighbor is irrelevant for that conclusion.
In addition (!), CAS ruled several times, not just once, again each time in an unanimous decision, that other additional facts were either "improbable" or even "highly improbable" to have come from the ridiculous boar burrito.
No, CAS did not ever just say "not more probably than not"! Why don't YOU stick to the facts for a change, using the exact words CAS used, instead of childishly insisting that one mustn't call an intentional doper a drug cheat, right after distorting the CAS findings?
Further, why did you start this argument again? Do you still not know the basic facts?