She is on T. Testosterone is a banned substance, that's why she is not welcome to compete with women. Surely you understand this. The fact that she wasn't immediately barred at the high school level is because of a failure of drug testing at that level.
Mack had to limit the amount of T he took to stay eligible in girls' wrestling. So he was complying with the rules. The problem existed somewhere else.
She is on T. Testosterone is a banned substance, that's why she is not welcome to compete with women. Surely you understand this. The fact that she wasn't immediately barred at the high school level is because of a failure of drug testing at that level.
Mack had to limit the amount of T he took to stay eligible in girls' wrestling. So he was complying with the rules. The problem existed somewhere else.
Any amount of extraneous drugs is cheating though. There really is no issue with women competing with men notwithstanding some minor example you dredged up. Females even with hormones just cannot compete with males in any sport. The real problem is with MtF, i.e. men competing as women. This study was simply a bad idea because the findings are irrelevant because as a matter of principle sports are divided by sex not gender. So even if young boys go on puberty blockers and are thereby diminished in strength, female sports is not a refuge for weak men.
Any amount of extraneous drugs is cheating though. There really is no issue with women competing with men notwithstanding some minor example you dredged up. Females even with hormones just cannot compete with males in any sport. The real problem is with MtF, i.e. men competing as women. This study was simply a bad idea because the findings are irrelevant because as a matter of principle sports are divided by sex not gender. So even if young boys go on puberty blockers and are thereby diminished in strength, female sports is not a refuge for weak men.
If the findings are irrelevant, why are you so afraid of this study?
Serioiusly even in the heyday of the trans madness why would Nike think it should fund a study about transgender kid athletes?
How does that help it sell shoes?
Does Nike fund a bunch of studies unrelated to it's core mission? Truly bizarre.
You aren’t kidding. Just look at Harper. That’s a dude who ran 2:23 back in the day.The Adam’s apple and jawline are a couple of warning signs. That’s not a woman. The constant attempts to frame those who want to protect women as nazis isn’t working anymore. Especially with the internet allowing people to see how violent many trans people get when they don’t get their way. Many of them obviously are jealous of and hate actual women.
You aren’t kidding. Just look at Harper. That’s a dude who ran 2:23 back in the day.The Adam’s apple and jawline are a couple of warning signs. That’s not a woman. The constant attempts to frame those who want to protect women as nazis isn’t working anymore. Especially with the internet allowing people to see how violent many trans people get when they don’t get their way. Many of them obviously are jealous of and hate actual women.
What does Harper's physical appearance have anything to do with her credibility as a researcher? Would it make any difference if she looked more feminine?
As for trans women hate cis women, where is the evidence? Many trans women and girls love their teammates and they idolize cis women in sports.
Harper's credibility as a researcher has nothing to do with his looks. His lack of credibility has to do with the methodological flaws, small sample sizes, self-reported data from non-elite athletes, which makes it unreliable. Many actual scientists such as Tommy Lundberg, Ross Tucker, Emma Hilton, Nicola Williams, Katrina Karkazis, Rebecca Jordan-Young & Claudia Astorino have conducted actual studies that fully discredit Harper's methods and conclusions. That fact that Harper still looks like a man after his "transition" is irrelevant.