Being able to dope for 12 months while skipping all drug tests is why this 22 mid runner ended up running 21.6 very shortly after.
Per Usada’s test history page
2019 3 2020 2 2021 6
The above doesn’t factor in tests conducted by other organisations during that time.
Too funny. She was provisionally banned in May 2020 for 3 missed tests in 12 months - and had a USADA total of only 3 tests in 2019 and 2 tests in 2020, i.e. an average of 2.5 tests in 12 months including in-competition tests...
The above doesn’t factor in tests conducted by other organisations during that time.
Too funny. She was provisionally banned in May 2020 for 3 missed tests in 12 months - and had a USADA total of only 3 tests in 2019 and 2 tests in 2020, i.e. an average of 2.5 tests in 12 months including in-competition tests...
Those numbers above are based on samples collected by Usada and don’t include samples collected by any other anti doping organisations. Any instance in which a sample was not collected would also not be included in those figures.
Yep. The white knighting to defend this awful woman is quite telling. Her being so tone deaf proves brains weren’t involved in her getting into college, never mind the arrogance involved in her handlers tactics in thinking this was a good idea. Don’t believe that they weren’t involved, they were.
She really is protected. That’s why that insightful post you answered was removed. The protected cheats always have those big toothy grins because they’re gloating.
All the American sprinters are probably doping, but I personally believe a 22.1 outdoors runner (also an NCAA record holder with 22.3 indoors — basically always had sub-22 potential), who was an Olympic Trials finalist as a college freshman, leaving an Ivy League program and becoming a 21.6x runner in her first year of training professionally, is more realistic (albeit still unlikely done clean) than MJW (a known quantity who has been training professionally for a while) going from a 22.4 runner to a 21.8 runner in one year, and a 10.8 to 10.6 runner in the same exact year. Also, keep in mind the season isn’t done, and she’s probably “gearing” up to drop a 10.5 and 21.7 in Tokyo — doing all of this while training under a notorious doping coach, while her teammate Kayla White suddenly became a 10.8x-low runner at age 28.
Say what you want but Buford-Bailey’s group is nowhere near as suspicious as Star Athletics and Buford-Bailey never tested positive in her professional career… unlike Dennis.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
Michael Johnson in his BBC broadcasting days... Carl Lewis talking about Ben Johnson...
It is funny because as a Havard grad you might be inclined to think she'd understand the tone-deafness in her speaking out on this topic - irrespective of what the truth really is. It's just something you personally shouldn't be addressing given your history Gabby.
Final thought. Does this also include guys that were doping but "just didn't know they were" - it was all their big bad coaches fault, but as soon as they felt something was up they quickly went and reported it in exchange for immunity from a ban? Or are they still allowed to coach too?
Tone deafness to who? LR posters? You're opinion is completely worthless and it's really sad and pathetic that you think people are thinking about you when they make statements like this.
Tone deafness to who? Followers of the sport - the ones on this very thread pointing out she got off an technicality. The ones saying the loudest anti-doping martyrs are often the dopers themselves. That's who.
She should be thinking about followers of the sport when she makes comments like this because quite simply if there were absolutely zero followers of the sport then her "job" as a professional athlete doesn't exist.
All the American sprinters are probably doping, but I personally believe a 22.1 outdoors runner (also an NCAA record holder with 22.3 indoors — basically always had sub-22 potential), who was an Olympic Trials finalist as a college freshman, leaving an Ivy League program and becoming a 21.6x runner in her first year of training professionally, is more realistic (albeit still unlikely done clean) than MJW (a known quantity who has been training professionally for a while) going from a 22.4 runner to a 21.8 runner in one year, and a 10.8 to 10.6 runner in the same exact year. Also, keep in mind the season isn’t done, and she’s probably “gearing” up to drop a 10.5 and 21.7 in Tokyo — doing all of this while training under a notorious doping coach, while her teammate Kayla White suddenly became a 10.8x-low runner at age 28.
Say what you want but Buford-Bailey’s group is nowhere near as suspicious as Star Athletics and Buford-Bailey never tested positive in her professional career… unlike Dennis.
But she’s just as suspect for running fast times after 3 missed test as MJW.
I agree it’s something fishy going on in Dennis camp but her coach has had athletes who served bans too
But she’s just as suspect for running fast times after 3 missed test as MJW.
I agree it’s something fishy going on in Dennis camp but her coach has had athletes who served bans too
I don’t disagree, and one thing people have pointed out on social media is she has run on relays with athletes from Star Athletics and Bobby Kersee, financially and publicly benefitting from those Gold medals, so it’s a bit hypocritical to take this public stance now.
And regarding Buford-Bailey’s group, of course it’s a red flag former athletes of hers have been suspended, but in the minds of athletes in the sport it’s a completely different ball game compared to a coach who actually procures and distributes PEDs. We know Mitchell doped as an athlete, was caught in a sting operation in 2017 by a journalist, and has also been implicated by Raestake as working with a doctor to get PEDs for his athletes.
Whereas, an athlete in a group testing positive does not directly implicate the coach… I remember Neita speaking about how she was in the same group as Okagbare and it was a huge betrayal of trust to find out she was doping, and she ended up leaving that training group. But allegedly, none of her teammates or coaches knew (which was backed up by her investigation).
This post was edited 29 seconds after it was posted.
Not even a technicality. She got off because some of her friends vouched that they were at home with her, and the doorbell never rang. And her phone was close by too. Nice blueprint for all the test dodgers.
That said, I fully agree with that tweet.
How would the proximity of the mobile phone enter into any of it? The doping control officer is not required to ring an athlete’s mobile when attempting to conduct an out of competition test.
If your goal as a doping control officer is to make the athlete take the test, why on earth would you not try calling their phone?
How would the proximity of the mobile phone enter into any of it? The doping control officer is not required to ring an athlete’s mobile when attempting to conduct an out of competition test.
If your goal as a doping control officer is to make the athlete take the test, why on earth would you not try calling their phone?
Last second surprises can sometimes nail dopers. Warnings beforehand? lol They’ll disappear like most Africans do in their home countries.
Too funny. She was provisionally banned in May 2020 for 3 missed tests in 12 months - and had a USADA total of only 3 tests in 2019 and 2 tests in 2020, i.e. an average of 2.5 tests in 12 months including in-competition tests...
Those numbers above are based on samples collected by Usada and don’t include samples collected by any other anti doping organisations. Any instance in which a sample was not collected would also not be included in those figures.
It still shows that USADA is not particularly diligent.
she got off on a technicality. the ones loudest about being anti-dopers are often the dopers themselves. she wants to advocate for a black and white rule, then why did she go to the AIU to attempt to abdicate herself from the whereabouts failures. there should be no reason you miss 3 tests in a year and she did.
Your only a cheat when another cheat decides your a cheat. If the people at the top don't believe in God then how does this work? But I know why they have no choice. Because it all began with the spirit of a little child who wanted things to be "ok". This is why Jesus hasd to die, so The King of Kings would stand against material life fully.