Hakdd wrote:
Almost every male has a longer ring finger than index finger, but, and I am not making this up, there is some indication that gay males are more likely to not, and perhaps testosterone in the womb is at play.
It's been a long time since I took a statistics course, but could that be like a Bayes rule example where a small group , though having it at a higher rate, isn't a majority with it? e.g. a group that's 5% of the population might have that at a 80% rate (or even 95), but with some false positive or it being prevalent in the larger population at rates makes it not a majority of people with the trait have it?
e.g. I put in P(A) = 0.05, P(B|A) = 0.95, and P(B) = 0.15 (I think this is false positive?, but B|A and B were hypothetical) via an online caculator I found, then P(A|B) would be 0.3167 = 31.67%? So that'd mean about 32% of people who have index longer than ring are gay - much higher than the 5% of the population but still not a majority