I don't know. Why don't you ask the 10s of thousands of business owners and individuals who routinely hire them at bargain basement prices?
They should be imprisoned too.
Illegal is illegal.
And where do you put the odds of that happening versus, say, the odds of legal immigrants, and even US citizens, getting caught up in ICE dragnets?
The fact that the people who employ undocumented immigrants never have and never will face consequences tells you all you need to know about what's happening now. None of it is actually about enforcing laws or protecting Americans. It's reactionary theater.
Lots of Americans both want undocumented immigrants in the country and want them terrorized in order to keep the cost of employing them down.
And where do you put the odds of that happening versus, say, the odds of legal immigrants, and even US citizens, getting caught up in ICE dragnets?
The fact that the people who employ undocumented immigrants never have and never will face consequences tells you all you need to know about what's happening now. None of it is actually about enforcing laws or protecting Americans. It's reactionary theater.
Lots of Americans both want undocumented immigrants in the country and want them terrorized in order to keep the cost of employing them down.
Legal immigrants and U.S. citizens can't be caught by ICE.
She made a post online explaining what rights migrants have under the constitution if they are detained by ICE. The Department of Justice is now being directed to investigate her by Trump's "border czar" who claims that providing this kind of public education is somehow illegal. He has now stated several times that she should be jailed.
While I am a first amendment absolutist, imprisoning AOC seems like the correct thing to do. Some whiny uberlibs might claim this is "fascist," but by telling illegals that they have rights, AOC has put law enforcement at risk of not being able to do whatever they want all the time. This is intolerable. If the police cannot operate without inconvenience or impunity, then chaos is assured.
I think you undermine your "first amendment absolutist" claim by saying someone should be jailed for something like this.
Also, unrelated to this but your claim on 1A absolutism: so you are ok with child porn? I mean porn is free speech but child porn is not. Does that also mean that I can say anything I want that would be defamatory about you in public and should face no consequences.
This is how it starts. Trump will be searching until he finds someone willing to do his bidding and lock her up. Once she is sent off to an El Salvador prison she will have zero recourse.
The real question is, when there aren’t anymore “liberals” to complain about what will the usual posters here create threads about. Maybe running.
And where do you put the odds of that happening versus, say, the odds of legal immigrants, and even US citizens, getting caught up in ICE dragnets?
The fact that the people who employ undocumented immigrants never have and never will face consequences tells you all you need to know about what's happening now. None of it is actually about enforcing laws or protecting Americans. It's reactionary theater.
Lots of Americans both want undocumented immigrants in the country and want them terrorized in order to keep the cost of employing them down.
Legal immigrants and U.S. citizens can't be caught by ICE.
They are documented.
If they are Hispanic, they are being detained in broad workplace sweeps later to be released. This is what I was referring to.
And the fact that you dodged the main point is telling.
Someone has to ask did she tell them their rights or offer advice about not getting caught? I would imagine their rights are limited not being an American citizen and breaking laws to come to the country.
You can have an open border or a welfare society but you can't have both at the same time. Open borders with 0 public assistance wouldn't be preferred but everyone crossing would have to fend for themselves. Otherwise, we clamp the border down completely and only give assistance to fellow Americans we deem are in need.
Instead, we've welcomed in millions of low IQ people with little to no skills AND handed them endless freebies in exchange. That's what AOC and her fellow anti-American radicals are in favor of, keeping the devaluing of America going through an unlimited invasion of non-Americans.
She made a post online explaining what rights migrants have under the constitution if they are detained by ICE. The Department of Justice is now being directed to investigate her by Trump's "border czar" who claims that providing this kind of public education is somehow illegal. He has now stated several times that she should be jailed.
While I am a first amendment absolutist, imprisoning AOC seems like the correct thing to do. Some whiny uberlibs might claim this is "fascist," but by telling illegals that they have rights, AOC has put law enforcement at risk of not being able to do whatever they want all the time. This is intolerable. If the police cannot operate without inconvenience or impunity, then chaos is assured.
Following up on an NBC News report, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said in a letter that ICE can't use its enforcement powers to arrest or detain U.S. citizens.
Agents conducted one of the biggest workplace raids since President Trump announced a crackdown on illegal immigration, detaining 97 workers in Morristown. But for residents, these workers were their neighbors.
You can have an open border or a welfare society but you can't have both at the same time. Open borders with 0 public assistance wouldn't be preferred but everyone crossing would have to fend for themselves. Otherwise, we clamp the border down completely and only give assistance to fellow Americans we deem are in need.
Instead, we've welcomed in millions of low IQ people with little to no skills AND handed them endless freebies in exchange. That's what AOC and her fellow anti-American radicals are in favor of, keeping the devaluing of America going through an unlimited invasion of non-Americans.
Hey, where's the "assumes facts not in evidence" guy on this one!?
She made a post online explaining what rights migrants have under the constitution if they are detained by ICE. The Department of Justice is now being directed to investigate her by Trump's "border czar" who claims that providing this kind of public education is somehow illegal. He has now stated several times that she should be jailed.
While I am a first amendment absolutist, imprisoning AOC seems like the correct thing to do. Some whiny uberlibs might claim this is "fascist," but by telling illegals that they have rights, AOC has put law enforcement at risk of not being able to do whatever they want all the time. This is intolerable. If the police cannot operate without inconvenience or impunity, then chaos is assured.
Come on people. This is 'tongue-in-cheek' parody. OP's point is that FASCISM is BAD. OP is making the point that talking about people's rights is NOT a crime, ffs.
let's be real, this is the political "crime" of opposing trump at all, wrapped up in the emotive but not illegal issue of informing people of their legal rights. it's a crime to be a coyote. it's technically a crime to illegally cross. it is not a crime to tell someone their rights.
just like i understand DOJ is being tasked with investigating various biden political choices like they were "crimes," eg, spending on climate changed.
Come on people. This is 'tongue-in-cheek' parody. OP's point is that FASCISM is BAD. OP is making the point that talking about people's rights is NOT a crime, ffs.
It's obvious that it's parody. It's just badly done and not funny.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.