Two woman ran 3:57 or faster in an Olympic 1500m final and were not close to medaling. Tell me, which among you saw that coming?
Probably most people who watched the Diamond League 1500m in Paris last month. It’s basically like a guy running 3:34 and not medaling in a race where two others recently ran 3:26 and 3:27.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
USA Men: Win medals, Clint Eastwood levels of badass (Goose, Hocker, Fisher, Mantz, Young, the steeple guy, the other 5k guy). They are focused on the task at hand. They Fing operate and do not get cute.
USA Womens: It’s all about what the ALSO are some combination of: Model, Mom, Dairy Farmer, Dude, victim of some mean boy, influencer, eating disorder survivor, PhD or some crap.
Yeah, hopefully Monson comes back strong. Gotta say I'm tired of Schweizer and Cranny doing the same thing over and over. Sitting in and just hanging on while the real kickers go. Total armchair quarterback here but maybe shake it up and try to take it when the pace slows in the middle? Or keeping doing the same thing and finish anywhere from 7-10th place. Again.
USA Men: Win medals, Clint Eastwood levels of badass (Goose, Hocker, Fisher, Mantz, Young, the steeple guy, the other 5k guy). They are focused on the task at hand. They Fing operate and do not get cute.
USA Womens: It’s all about what the ALSO are some combination of: Model, Mom, Dairy Farmer, Dude, victim of some mean boy, influencer, eating disorder survivor, PhD or some crap.
Mom like Faith Kipyegon? PhD or some crap like Laura Muir? Were the US men less focused last Olympics where none of them medalled?
You sound like a misogynistic a$$hole. Sure, the US distance women didn't do great, but to chalk it up to a lack of focus strikes me as very ill-willed.
Hiltz and St.Pierre were with the leaders all the way until the last lap. Laura Muir sat off the pace and moved up later to run 3:53 for 5th. I imagine that if they had gone out with Muir, they could have finished in a similar time. They went after it and faded late. Maybe the next time they try that they will hang on a bit longer. I remember Hull went after Kipyegon during her record last year and faded on the last lap. This year she didn't fade. There's something to be said for taking risks. Muir took a risk hanging back and she missed out on a medal. For the longer distances, when I look at the top men in the NCAA, they seem closer to being able to compete internationally than the top women. The top guys are 20 to 30 seconds away from the top pro runners, while the women are a minute back (other than Valby who is still 40-50 seconds back). Are they being brought along too slowly?
The point is that I have no idea what grant, hocker, etc have going on outside of running because they don’t hang their hats on anything except running. Girls I care too much about external validation via insta vs. just winning races. The score is focused men : a bunch of medals. distracted chicks: zero medals. Facts are stubborn things.
I think we will have a good 5k team in 4 years with Monson, ESP, and Valby/Tuohy/Henes/etc
We have some excellent up-and-coming women in the 800: Whittaker, Wiley, Willis, Gorriarian
Might take a little longer to field a strong 1500 squad but I am bullish on Wiley and Engelhardt. For better or worse, wizard coach JS (the one at Oregon) is managing some of our best prospects of recent vintage
In my opinion the culture is there nationally but HS and college coaches need to do a better job of individually tailoring training; there are probably many female - and male, for that matter - phenoms who could stay healthy and gradually improve off the Valby method, it just takes a lot of patience and self-belief to try that approach vs miles miles miles
Non of those women can be world class
If you're in an olympic final, you're world class.
USA needs help on the women’s distance side of things.
Didn't we have like all 3 women making finals in 15, 5? And solid 3 in 10k? I'm not sure if that's the pattern historically, but it seems pretty solid.
None of the women 800 and up who made their finals ever looked like they were going to medal, at any point in any race, realistically. Maybe Dakotah just for a bit around halfway, she might have had me thinking the story was going to get even crazier.
Let's be honest it's pretty hard to compete with today's clownworld times like 28:46 and 14:00 (sub-14s coming soon).
Valby has massive potential and I think Alicia Monson could maybe sneak in for a bronze in the right race a la Grant Fisher, if she were healthy.
I agree, I don’t think our women are doing poorly, necessarily, just did not run their best races at the Olympics.
Athing Mu, if she’s her at her best, could still be one of the top 800m runners in the world.
Hiltz and ESP are running 3:55s when it takes a 3:52 to medal, a time that only 3 women had ever run a few years ago (omitting China’s infamous “Ma’s Army” and before Genzebe Dibaba, no female runner had run.
The 5000 wasn’t horrible, it just wasn’t enough.
In the 10,000, this was a low event for the US. With Monson out, there isn’t a runner rn who could realistically compete for a top 5 position.
Not even one mention of Kelati and the future of american running. Shemost likely will be starting her marathon career soon and will, I think, be one of the best marathoners in the world......
This year alone she went from 14:51- 14:33 int he 5k, and 31:09 to 30:34 in the 10k, along with an american record in her first half marathon ever.
ESP was probably our best bet for a medal and she went out too aggressively. (Jakob made the same mistake, just less dramatically -- he was ~1 second too fast at 400 while ESP was probably ~3.)
As to why the American distance men were resurgent and the women weren't, I guess my weak hypothesis is that our men's distance squad took a lot of risks in the past few years that paid off when the women didn't. I'm thinking about Grant leaving BTC but Schweizer not. On the other hand, Cranny left for team Bosshard and we're not seeing much out of that.
Another possibility is that doping controls have gotten stricter for men but not for women so Kenyan and Ethiopian men struggled in this Olympics but their women didn't. I don't have any specific reason to think this is true besides a general feeling that men's sports tend to get more attention and scrutiny.
Quite a bit of unjustified doom and gloom here. We were missing was Alicia Monson in the 5k and 10k. Very well could have seen here getting a result like the Italian woman. The 1500 women ran very good times, just happened to be some absolute world beaters out there this year (who predicts Hull and Bell getting that fast this year). We probably would have medaled in the 800 if Athing Mu was there. A fully fit Emily Sisson probably runs under 2:25 on this course and maybe picks off runners 5-7 in the last couple miles.
If anything, our women runners were cursed by a few untimely injuries and lack of fitness.
Explain Nadia Battocletti. Missed gold by about a meter.
Here'a hint: US runners at distances above 1500 lack the speed to compete internationally, and domestic competitions do not reveal that flaw. The US system selects young women for endurance but not speed.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.